投资组合保险策略:OBPI与CPPI

P. Bertrand, J. Prigent
{"title":"投资组合保险策略:OBPI与CPPI","authors":"P. Bertrand, J. Prigent","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.299688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We compare performances of the two standard portfolio insurance methods: the Option Based Portfolio Insurance (OBPI) and the Constant Proportion Portfolio Insurance (CPPI). First we examine basic properties of these two strategies and compare them by means of various criteria: comparison of their payoffs, possible property of stochastic dominance, expectations, variances, skewness and kurtosis of their returns, and some of the quantiles of their returns. We prove that the OBPI method can be analyzed as a kind of CPPI where the multiple is allowed to vary. We then study the properties of this varying multiple. In a second section, we analyze more deeply both method's dynamic properties. We turn our attention to the dynamics management involved by these two strategies. Although the pure OBPI do not require any management by the buyer (if the put or call option is available on the market), we can calculate the \"greeks\" of its call part. We derive the \"greeks\" of the CPPI and show the very different nature of the dynamic properties of the two strategies.","PeriodicalId":151935,"journal":{"name":"EFA 2002 Submissions","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"116","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Portfolio Insurance Strategies: OBPI Versus CPPI\",\"authors\":\"P. Bertrand, J. Prigent\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.299688\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We compare performances of the two standard portfolio insurance methods: the Option Based Portfolio Insurance (OBPI) and the Constant Proportion Portfolio Insurance (CPPI). First we examine basic properties of these two strategies and compare them by means of various criteria: comparison of their payoffs, possible property of stochastic dominance, expectations, variances, skewness and kurtosis of their returns, and some of the quantiles of their returns. We prove that the OBPI method can be analyzed as a kind of CPPI where the multiple is allowed to vary. We then study the properties of this varying multiple. In a second section, we analyze more deeply both method's dynamic properties. We turn our attention to the dynamics management involved by these two strategies. Although the pure OBPI do not require any management by the buyer (if the put or call option is available on the market), we can calculate the \\\"greeks\\\" of its call part. We derive the \\\"greeks\\\" of the CPPI and show the very different nature of the dynamic properties of the two strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":151935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EFA 2002 Submissions\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"116\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EFA 2002 Submissions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.299688\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFA 2002 Submissions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.299688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 116

摘要

我们比较了两种标准的投资组合保险方法:基于期权的投资组合保险(OBPI)和固定比例的投资组合保险(CPPI)。首先,我们检查这两种策略的基本性质,并通过各种标准对它们进行比较:它们的收益比较,随机优势的可能性质,期望,方差,偏度和峰度的回报,以及它们的回报的一些分位数。我们证明了OBPI方法可以被分析为一种允许倍数变化的CPPI。然后我们研究这个变倍数的性质。在第二部分中,我们将更深入地分析这两种方法的动态特性。我们将注意力转向这两种策略所涉及的动态管理。虽然纯OBPI不需要买方的任何管理(如果市场上有看跌或看涨期权),但我们可以计算其看涨部分的“希腊人”。我们推导了CPPI的“希腊人”,并展示了这两种策略的动态特性的非常不同的本质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Portfolio Insurance Strategies: OBPI Versus CPPI
We compare performances of the two standard portfolio insurance methods: the Option Based Portfolio Insurance (OBPI) and the Constant Proportion Portfolio Insurance (CPPI). First we examine basic properties of these two strategies and compare them by means of various criteria: comparison of their payoffs, possible property of stochastic dominance, expectations, variances, skewness and kurtosis of their returns, and some of the quantiles of their returns. We prove that the OBPI method can be analyzed as a kind of CPPI where the multiple is allowed to vary. We then study the properties of this varying multiple. In a second section, we analyze more deeply both method's dynamic properties. We turn our attention to the dynamics management involved by these two strategies. Although the pure OBPI do not require any management by the buyer (if the put or call option is available on the market), we can calculate the "greeks" of its call part. We derive the "greeks" of the CPPI and show the very different nature of the dynamic properties of the two strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信