《句法课》中《书》的批判观与先知圣训的反驳研究。

Fuhaid Ar Rabah
{"title":"《句法课》中《书》的批判观与先知圣训的反驳研究。","authors":"Fuhaid Ar Rabah","doi":"10.56760/iicu7520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research is a critique made against a book addressed to one of the issues related to grammar rules. It was stated in the chapter of hearing named the evidence of citation and rejection; and part of this was concerned with the Prophetic Hadith. The earliest grammarians showed less refusal or rare or lacking rejection against citation while some latest of them raised the issue and said that the earliest adopted abstention doctrine. However, the author had overcome the issue by producing this book; and mentioned three doctrines in terms of rejection issue; supported those of approved doctrine and desired cancel of abstention doctrine. In examining the book, I found that some judgments were made on issues without supported realities as well as other judgments on issues without basis. The author of the book was influenced by the emotion and favor which was appeared in the presentation and discussion. Therefore, I decided ultimately to write my remarks and criticism against the author’s presentation, judgments and chapters of the book.","PeriodicalId":270236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human and Administrative Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acritique View of Book and Research on Objection By Prophetic Hadith In Syntax Lesson.\",\"authors\":\"Fuhaid Ar Rabah\",\"doi\":\"10.56760/iicu7520\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research is a critique made against a book addressed to one of the issues related to grammar rules. It was stated in the chapter of hearing named the evidence of citation and rejection; and part of this was concerned with the Prophetic Hadith. The earliest grammarians showed less refusal or rare or lacking rejection against citation while some latest of them raised the issue and said that the earliest adopted abstention doctrine. However, the author had overcome the issue by producing this book; and mentioned three doctrines in terms of rejection issue; supported those of approved doctrine and desired cancel of abstention doctrine. In examining the book, I found that some judgments were made on issues without supported realities as well as other judgments on issues without basis. The author of the book was influenced by the emotion and favor which was appeared in the presentation and discussion. Therefore, I decided ultimately to write my remarks and criticism against the author’s presentation, judgments and chapters of the book.\",\"PeriodicalId\":270236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human and Administrative Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human and Administrative Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56760/iicu7520\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human and Administrative Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56760/iicu7520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究是对一本书提出的一个与语法规则有关的问题的批评。它在听证的章节中被命名为引用和拒绝的证据;其中一部分与先知圣训有关。最早的语法学家对引用的拒绝较少或很少或缺乏拒绝,而最近的一些语法学家提出了这个问题,并说最早的语法学家采用了弃权原则。然而,作者通过出版这本书克服了这个问题;在拒绝问题上提到了三个理论;支持赞成主义,希望取消弃权主义。在考察这本书的过程中,我发现一些判断是在没有事实支持的情况下做出的,还有一些判断是在没有根据的情况下做出的。这本书的作者受到了演讲和讨论中出现的情感和好感的影响。因此,我最终决定写我的评论和批评对作者的介绍,判断和章节的书。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acritique View of Book and Research on Objection By Prophetic Hadith In Syntax Lesson.
This research is a critique made against a book addressed to one of the issues related to grammar rules. It was stated in the chapter of hearing named the evidence of citation and rejection; and part of this was concerned with the Prophetic Hadith. The earliest grammarians showed less refusal or rare or lacking rejection against citation while some latest of them raised the issue and said that the earliest adopted abstention doctrine. However, the author had overcome the issue by producing this book; and mentioned three doctrines in terms of rejection issue; supported those of approved doctrine and desired cancel of abstention doctrine. In examining the book, I found that some judgments were made on issues without supported realities as well as other judgments on issues without basis. The author of the book was influenced by the emotion and favor which was appeared in the presentation and discussion. Therefore, I decided ultimately to write my remarks and criticism against the author’s presentation, judgments and chapters of the book.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信