{"title":"国际仲裁","authors":"Hélène Ruiz Fabri, Edoardo Stoppioni","doi":"10.1093/law/9780198796190.003.0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines some of the methodological elements of feminist\n approaches to international law to rethink international arbitration.\n The central focus of a feminist prism appears to be whether\n international arbitration is subjugated by patriarchal domination\n structures, bias and injustice, thus mirroring and even reinforcing the\n idiosyncrasies of international law, especially international economic\n law. Probably, one could answer yes to all these questions, and this is\n essentially why the legitimacy of international arbitration is so much\n at stake. However, the absence of such a dispute settlement system would\n not necessarily lead to a better situation for international economic\n regulation: if international law did not regulate resources at all, the\n international order would be that much more unjust. A feminist\n deconstruction shows the need for clear, transparent, and well-balanced\n rules and dispute settlement resolution systems, and not their absence.\n This direction is the one progressively taken by projects of reform.","PeriodicalId":448349,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of International Arbitration","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International Arbitration\",\"authors\":\"Hélène Ruiz Fabri, Edoardo Stoppioni\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/law/9780198796190.003.0022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter examines some of the methodological elements of feminist\\n approaches to international law to rethink international arbitration.\\n The central focus of a feminist prism appears to be whether\\n international arbitration is subjugated by patriarchal domination\\n structures, bias and injustice, thus mirroring and even reinforcing the\\n idiosyncrasies of international law, especially international economic\\n law. Probably, one could answer yes to all these questions, and this is\\n essentially why the legitimacy of international arbitration is so much\\n at stake. However, the absence of such a dispute settlement system would\\n not necessarily lead to a better situation for international economic\\n regulation: if international law did not regulate resources at all, the\\n international order would be that much more unjust. A feminist\\n deconstruction shows the need for clear, transparent, and well-balanced\\n rules and dispute settlement resolution systems, and not their absence.\\n This direction is the one progressively taken by projects of reform.\",\"PeriodicalId\":448349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Oxford Handbook of International Arbitration\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Oxford Handbook of International Arbitration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198796190.003.0022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of International Arbitration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198796190.003.0022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This chapter examines some of the methodological elements of feminist
approaches to international law to rethink international arbitration.
The central focus of a feminist prism appears to be whether
international arbitration is subjugated by patriarchal domination
structures, bias and injustice, thus mirroring and even reinforcing the
idiosyncrasies of international law, especially international economic
law. Probably, one could answer yes to all these questions, and this is
essentially why the legitimacy of international arbitration is so much
at stake. However, the absence of such a dispute settlement system would
not necessarily lead to a better situation for international economic
regulation: if international law did not regulate resources at all, the
international order would be that much more unjust. A feminist
deconstruction shows the need for clear, transparent, and well-balanced
rules and dispute settlement resolution systems, and not their absence.
This direction is the one progressively taken by projects of reform.