事物本身

Manley Thompson
{"title":"事物本身","authors":"Manley Thompson","doi":"10.5840/APAPA2013135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"You may guess from my title that I am going to talk a good deal this evening about the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. While the guess is correct in that I will make frequent reference to Kant's writings and occasionally quote some of his remarks, I want to emphasize at the start that my primary concern is not that of a Kant scholar urging an interpretation of Kant. My concern is rather with epistemology and the approach to it that gives rise to the Kantian notion of a thing in itself. In my efforts to clarify this approach I will contrast it with others, and I will say quite a bit about the views of C.S. Peirce. When I speak of the approach as Kantian, I am not concerned to argue that it is the approach Kant himself always followed, but only that it is the one we should follow if we begin in epistemology as Kant did. For those of you who have a special interest in Kant's moral philosophy, let me add now that I distinguish sharply between the role of a thing in itself in epistemology and its role in Kant's moral philosophy. I comment briefly on this distinction near the end of my paper.","PeriodicalId":443144,"journal":{"name":"The American Philosophical Association Centennial Series","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Things in Themselves\",\"authors\":\"Manley Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/APAPA2013135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"You may guess from my title that I am going to talk a good deal this evening about the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. While the guess is correct in that I will make frequent reference to Kant's writings and occasionally quote some of his remarks, I want to emphasize at the start that my primary concern is not that of a Kant scholar urging an interpretation of Kant. My concern is rather with epistemology and the approach to it that gives rise to the Kantian notion of a thing in itself. In my efforts to clarify this approach I will contrast it with others, and I will say quite a bit about the views of C.S. Peirce. When I speak of the approach as Kantian, I am not concerned to argue that it is the approach Kant himself always followed, but only that it is the one we should follow if we begin in epistemology as Kant did. For those of you who have a special interest in Kant's moral philosophy, let me add now that I distinguish sharply between the role of a thing in itself in epistemology and its role in Kant's moral philosophy. I comment briefly on this distinction near the end of my paper.\",\"PeriodicalId\":443144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American Philosophical Association Centennial Series\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1983-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American Philosophical Association Centennial Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/APAPA2013135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Philosophical Association Centennial Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/APAPA2013135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

你们可以从我的题目中猜到,今晚我要讲很多关于伊曼努尔·康德哲学的内容。虽然我的猜测是正确的,因为我将经常引用康德的著作,偶尔引用他的一些评论,但我想在一开始就强调,我主要关心的不是康德学者对康德的解释。我更关心的是认识论和它的方法,它产生了康德的物自体概念。在我努力阐明这一观点的过程中,我会将其与其他观点进行对比,并且我会对C.S.皮尔斯的观点进行相当多的阐述。当我说康德的方法时,我并不是说这是康德自己一直遵循的方法,而只是说,如果我们像康德那样从认识论开始,这是我们应该遵循的方法。对于那些对康德道德哲学特别感兴趣的人,我想补充一点,我对认识论中事物本身的作用和康德道德哲学中的作用有明确的区分。我在论文的末尾简要地评论了这一区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Things in Themselves
You may guess from my title that I am going to talk a good deal this evening about the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. While the guess is correct in that I will make frequent reference to Kant's writings and occasionally quote some of his remarks, I want to emphasize at the start that my primary concern is not that of a Kant scholar urging an interpretation of Kant. My concern is rather with epistemology and the approach to it that gives rise to the Kantian notion of a thing in itself. In my efforts to clarify this approach I will contrast it with others, and I will say quite a bit about the views of C.S. Peirce. When I speak of the approach as Kantian, I am not concerned to argue that it is the approach Kant himself always followed, but only that it is the one we should follow if we begin in epistemology as Kant did. For those of you who have a special interest in Kant's moral philosophy, let me add now that I distinguish sharply between the role of a thing in itself in epistemology and its role in Kant's moral philosophy. I comment briefly on this distinction near the end of my paper.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信