一种与文档相关的理解面向对象程序的方法

L. Etzkorn, C. Davis
{"title":"一种与文档相关的理解面向对象程序的方法","authors":"L. Etzkorn, C. Davis","doi":"10.1109/WPC.1994.341247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Object-oriented code is considered to be inherently more reusable than functional decomposition code; however, object-oriented code can suffer from a program understanding standpoint since good object-oriented style seems to require a large number of small methods. Hence code for a particular task may be scattered widely. Thus good semantics based tools are necessary. This paper describes an approach to object-oriented code understanding that focuses largely on informal linguistic aspects of code, such as comments and identifiers.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":308971,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 1994 IEEE 3rd Workshop on Program Comprehension- WPC '94","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A documentation-related approach to object-oriented program understanding\",\"authors\":\"L. Etzkorn, C. Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WPC.1994.341247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Object-oriented code is considered to be inherently more reusable than functional decomposition code; however, object-oriented code can suffer from a program understanding standpoint since good object-oriented style seems to require a large number of small methods. Hence code for a particular task may be scattered widely. Thus good semantics based tools are necessary. This paper describes an approach to object-oriented code understanding that focuses largely on informal linguistic aspects of code, such as comments and identifiers.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":308971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 1994 IEEE 3rd Workshop on Program Comprehension- WPC '94\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 1994 IEEE 3rd Workshop on Program Comprehension- WPC '94\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WPC.1994.341247\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 1994 IEEE 3rd Workshop on Program Comprehension- WPC '94","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WPC.1994.341247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

面向对象的代码被认为本质上比功能分解代码更具可重用性;然而,从程序理解的角度来看,面向对象代码可能会受到影响,因为良好的面向对象风格似乎需要大量的小方法。因此,用于特定任务的代码可能分散得很广。因此,良好的基于语义的工具是必要的。本文描述了一种面向对象的代码理解方法,该方法主要关注代码的非正式语言方面,例如注释和标识符。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A documentation-related approach to object-oriented program understanding
Object-oriented code is considered to be inherently more reusable than functional decomposition code; however, object-oriented code can suffer from a program understanding standpoint since good object-oriented style seems to require a large number of small methods. Hence code for a particular task may be scattered widely. Thus good semantics based tools are necessary. This paper describes an approach to object-oriented code understanding that focuses largely on informal linguistic aspects of code, such as comments and identifiers.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信