引文分析

M. Bruhn
{"title":"引文分析","authors":"M. Bruhn","doi":"10.1075/SSOL.17009.BRU","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper presents series of historiometric studies that exemplify the value of “citation analysis” as an\n empirical approach to professional literary-critical interpretation, especially with respect to the question of the “literariness”\n of literary texts. Specifically, the studies show that professional interpreters of Wordsworth’s poetry, across more than a\n century of time and despite widely varying critical approaches, tend to pay more attention to and therefore more frequently cite\n lines that involve prospective enjambments. Lines involving nominative noun phrase and retrospective enjambments, however, did not\n reveal the same correlation with frequency of citation. The studies thus suggest that literariness does indeed have a relatively\n stable textual component that may be discriminated through citation analysis of professional interpretations of individual\n literary texts by authors writing in distinct genres of literature and in different periods in literary history.","PeriodicalId":222412,"journal":{"name":"Empirical Studies of Literariness","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Citation analysis\",\"authors\":\"M. Bruhn\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/SSOL.17009.BRU\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper presents series of historiometric studies that exemplify the value of “citation analysis” as an\\n empirical approach to professional literary-critical interpretation, especially with respect to the question of the “literariness”\\n of literary texts. Specifically, the studies show that professional interpreters of Wordsworth’s poetry, across more than a\\n century of time and despite widely varying critical approaches, tend to pay more attention to and therefore more frequently cite\\n lines that involve prospective enjambments. Lines involving nominative noun phrase and retrospective enjambments, however, did not\\n reveal the same correlation with frequency of citation. The studies thus suggest that literariness does indeed have a relatively\\n stable textual component that may be discriminated through citation analysis of professional interpretations of individual\\n literary texts by authors writing in distinct genres of literature and in different periods in literary history.\",\"PeriodicalId\":222412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Empirical Studies of Literariness\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Empirical Studies of Literariness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/SSOL.17009.BRU\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Empirical Studies of Literariness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/SSOL.17009.BRU","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文介绍了一系列历史计量学研究,这些研究举例说明了“引文分析”作为专业文学批评解释的经验方法的价值,特别是在文学文本的“文学性”问题上。具体来说,这些研究表明,在一个多世纪的时间里,尽管批评方法各不相同,但华兹华斯诗歌的专业诠解者往往更关注并因此更频繁地引用那些涉及未来联系的诗句。然而,涉及主名词短语和回顾性捆绑的行与引用频率没有显示出相同的相关性。因此,这些研究表明,文学性确实具有相对稳定的文本成分,可以通过对不同文学体裁和不同文学史时期作者对个别文学文本的专业解释的引文分析来区分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Citation analysis
This paper presents series of historiometric studies that exemplify the value of “citation analysis” as an empirical approach to professional literary-critical interpretation, especially with respect to the question of the “literariness” of literary texts. Specifically, the studies show that professional interpreters of Wordsworth’s poetry, across more than a century of time and despite widely varying critical approaches, tend to pay more attention to and therefore more frequently cite lines that involve prospective enjambments. Lines involving nominative noun phrase and retrospective enjambments, however, did not reveal the same correlation with frequency of citation. The studies thus suggest that literariness does indeed have a relatively stable textual component that may be discriminated through citation analysis of professional interpretations of individual literary texts by authors writing in distinct genres of literature and in different periods in literary history.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信