纳粹统治下东欧的共谋与冷漠

M. Fulbrook
{"title":"纳粹统治下东欧的共谋与冷漠","authors":"M. Fulbrook","doi":"10.21039/105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While western Europeans have for some time been facing up to questions of complicity and collaboration with Nazi Germany, debates over collaboration in Eastern Europe have been far slower to surface. In part this had to do with the relative inaccessibility of archives and the hegemony of Soviet narratives of heroic communist resistance during the Cold War period. But in part it relates to the continuing significance of the Nazi past even in the post-1989 period. As the editors of this volume, Peter Black, Bela Rasky, and Marianne Windsperger, point out, with the collapse of communist rule, former anti-communist resistance activists were often celebrated as national heroes, overlooking the fact that many had been antisemitic fascists during the Nazi period. Moreover, the topic raises sensitive questions about far larger numbers of people. As Paul Schapiro points out in his opening remarks, ‘bystanding’ in face of collective violence is not neutral’.1 Commenting that","PeriodicalId":152877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perpetrator Research","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complicity and Indifference in Eastern Europe under Nazi Rule\",\"authors\":\"M. Fulbrook\",\"doi\":\"10.21039/105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While western Europeans have for some time been facing up to questions of complicity and collaboration with Nazi Germany, debates over collaboration in Eastern Europe have been far slower to surface. In part this had to do with the relative inaccessibility of archives and the hegemony of Soviet narratives of heroic communist resistance during the Cold War period. But in part it relates to the continuing significance of the Nazi past even in the post-1989 period. As the editors of this volume, Peter Black, Bela Rasky, and Marianne Windsperger, point out, with the collapse of communist rule, former anti-communist resistance activists were often celebrated as national heroes, overlooking the fact that many had been antisemitic fascists during the Nazi period. Moreover, the topic raises sensitive questions about far larger numbers of people. As Paul Schapiro points out in his opening remarks, ‘bystanding’ in face of collective violence is not neutral’.1 Commenting that\",\"PeriodicalId\":152877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Perpetrator Research\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Perpetrator Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21039/105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perpetrator Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21039/105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一段时间以来,西欧人一直面临着与纳粹德国共谋和合作的问题,而关于东欧合作的争论则要慢得多。在某种程度上,这与档案的相对难以获取以及苏联在冷战时期英勇抵抗共产主义的叙事的霸权有关。但在某种程度上,这与纳粹历史的持续重要性有关,即使在1989年之后的时期也是如此。本书的编辑彼得·布莱克(Peter Black)、贝拉·拉斯基(Bela Rasky)和玛丽安·温斯伯格(Marianne windspberger)指出,随着共产主义统治的崩溃,前反共抵抗活动人士经常被誉为民族英雄,而忽略了一个事实,即许多人在纳粹时期曾是反犹法西斯主义者。此外,这个话题还引发了涉及更多人群的敏感问题。正如保罗·夏皮罗(Paul Schapiro)在开场白中指出的那样,面对集体暴力,“袖手旁观”不是中立的评论,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Complicity and Indifference in Eastern Europe under Nazi Rule
While western Europeans have for some time been facing up to questions of complicity and collaboration with Nazi Germany, debates over collaboration in Eastern Europe have been far slower to surface. In part this had to do with the relative inaccessibility of archives and the hegemony of Soviet narratives of heroic communist resistance during the Cold War period. But in part it relates to the continuing significance of the Nazi past even in the post-1989 period. As the editors of this volume, Peter Black, Bela Rasky, and Marianne Windsperger, point out, with the collapse of communist rule, former anti-communist resistance activists were often celebrated as national heroes, overlooking the fact that many had been antisemitic fascists during the Nazi period. Moreover, the topic raises sensitive questions about far larger numbers of people. As Paul Schapiro points out in his opening remarks, ‘bystanding’ in face of collective violence is not neutral’.1 Commenting that
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信