公共交通对经济可持续性的影响:以埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴轻轨交通为例

Kassa Moges
{"title":"公共交通对经济可持续性的影响:以埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴轻轨交通为例","authors":"Kassa Moges","doi":"10.56302/jads.v7i2.3108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sustainability of urban public transits is widely accepted but, there are diversified opinions and debates regarding modes of public transit. It is an unanswered whether road-based or rail-based public transport is more sustainable for rapidly growing cities like Addis Ababa. This study is done to empirically evaluate the economic sustainability impacts by Addis Ababa light rail transit (AA-LRT) using performance indicators like travel time, travel cost andemployment generation. Likely, it investigates whether AA-LRT is more economically sustainable or not, compared to other road-based public transits such as City-buses and Midi-buses and compared to the situation before the start of AA- LRT operation. Samples for onboard surveys were selected from transit users and experts through proportional quota sampling. Empirical quasi experiment, multi-criteria analysis and comparative impactanalysis approaches were used together with Paired-samples t-test, One way ANOVA, Ordinal and Logistic Regression. Findings indicate AA-LRT is really producing economic benefits such as travel time savings and affordable travel costs since 2015. Benefits are found to be more economically sustainable in AA-LRT than other road-based public transits. Furthermore, travel time and travel cost benefits in the post-AA-LRT period are better than situations before the start of AA-LRT in 2015. Thus, AA-LRT makes a more significant contribution to economic sustainability. However, it has little weaknesses like inadequate crossing facilities, overcrowded and delayed trips, troubled transfer, fare, and ticket system. To enhance the economic sustainability and address shortcomings, new designs like overhead crossings; expansion of rail network coverage; increasing number of trains and speed; integration among transits; implementation of flat fare and improving ticket system arerecommended.","PeriodicalId":128999,"journal":{"name":"Journal of African Development Studies","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impacts of Public Transit on Economic Sustainability: A Case of Addis Ababa Light Rail Transit, Ethiopia\",\"authors\":\"Kassa Moges\",\"doi\":\"10.56302/jads.v7i2.3108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sustainability of urban public transits is widely accepted but, there are diversified opinions and debates regarding modes of public transit. It is an unanswered whether road-based or rail-based public transport is more sustainable for rapidly growing cities like Addis Ababa. This study is done to empirically evaluate the economic sustainability impacts by Addis Ababa light rail transit (AA-LRT) using performance indicators like travel time, travel cost andemployment generation. Likely, it investigates whether AA-LRT is more economically sustainable or not, compared to other road-based public transits such as City-buses and Midi-buses and compared to the situation before the start of AA- LRT operation. Samples for onboard surveys were selected from transit users and experts through proportional quota sampling. Empirical quasi experiment, multi-criteria analysis and comparative impactanalysis approaches were used together with Paired-samples t-test, One way ANOVA, Ordinal and Logistic Regression. Findings indicate AA-LRT is really producing economic benefits such as travel time savings and affordable travel costs since 2015. Benefits are found to be more economically sustainable in AA-LRT than other road-based public transits. Furthermore, travel time and travel cost benefits in the post-AA-LRT period are better than situations before the start of AA-LRT in 2015. Thus, AA-LRT makes a more significant contribution to economic sustainability. However, it has little weaknesses like inadequate crossing facilities, overcrowded and delayed trips, troubled transfer, fare, and ticket system. To enhance the economic sustainability and address shortcomings, new designs like overhead crossings; expansion of rail network coverage; increasing number of trains and speed; integration among transits; implementation of flat fare and improving ticket system arerecommended.\",\"PeriodicalId\":128999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of African Development Studies\",\"volume\":\"106 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of African Development Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56302/jads.v7i2.3108\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of African Development Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56302/jads.v7i2.3108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城市公共交通的可持续性被广泛接受,但是,关于公共交通的模式存在不同的意见和争论。对于像亚的斯亚贝巴这样快速发展的城市来说,公路公共交通和铁路公共交通哪个更可持续,这是一个没有答案的问题。本研究利用出行时间、出行成本和就业创造等绩效指标,对亚的斯亚贝巴轻轨交通(AA-LRT)的经济可持续性影响进行了实证评估。它可能会调查AA-LRT与其他基于道路的公共交通(如城市公交车和midi -bus)以及AA-LRT开始运营之前的情况相比,是否更具经济可持续性。船上调查的样本是通过比例配额抽样从过境用户和专家中选择的。采用实证准实验、多准则分析和比较影响分析方法,并结合配对样本t检验、单因素方差分析、序数和逻辑回归。研究结果表明,自2015年以来,AA-LRT确实产生了经济效益,如节省旅行时间和负担得起的旅行成本。研究发现,与其他以道路为基础的公共交通工具相比,AA-LRT的效益更具经济可持续性。此外,2015年开通后的出行时间和出行成本效益均优于开通前。因此,AA-LRT对经济可持续性的贡献更大。然而,它也有一些缺点,如过境设施不完善,拥挤和延误的行程,麻烦的转移,票价和票务系统。为了提高经济的可持续性和解决缺点,新的设计,如架空交叉口;扩大铁路网覆盖范围;增加列车数量和速度;过境之间的一体化;建议实行统一票价和改善票务制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impacts of Public Transit on Economic Sustainability: A Case of Addis Ababa Light Rail Transit, Ethiopia
Sustainability of urban public transits is widely accepted but, there are diversified opinions and debates regarding modes of public transit. It is an unanswered whether road-based or rail-based public transport is more sustainable for rapidly growing cities like Addis Ababa. This study is done to empirically evaluate the economic sustainability impacts by Addis Ababa light rail transit (AA-LRT) using performance indicators like travel time, travel cost andemployment generation. Likely, it investigates whether AA-LRT is more economically sustainable or not, compared to other road-based public transits such as City-buses and Midi-buses and compared to the situation before the start of AA- LRT operation. Samples for onboard surveys were selected from transit users and experts through proportional quota sampling. Empirical quasi experiment, multi-criteria analysis and comparative impactanalysis approaches were used together with Paired-samples t-test, One way ANOVA, Ordinal and Logistic Regression. Findings indicate AA-LRT is really producing economic benefits such as travel time savings and affordable travel costs since 2015. Benefits are found to be more economically sustainable in AA-LRT than other road-based public transits. Furthermore, travel time and travel cost benefits in the post-AA-LRT period are better than situations before the start of AA-LRT in 2015. Thus, AA-LRT makes a more significant contribution to economic sustainability. However, it has little weaknesses like inadequate crossing facilities, overcrowded and delayed trips, troubled transfer, fare, and ticket system. To enhance the economic sustainability and address shortcomings, new designs like overhead crossings; expansion of rail network coverage; increasing number of trains and speed; integration among transits; implementation of flat fare and improving ticket system arerecommended.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信