从约书亚到撒母耳:论士师记的起源

K. Spronk
{"title":"从约书亚到撒母耳:论士师记的起源","authors":"K. Spronk","doi":"10.1163/EJ.9789004175150.I-474.58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The basic problem or challenge a modern commentator on books such as Joshua and Judges faces is that he/she has to take a deliberate stand in the ongoing discussion on the Deuteronomistic history. This chapter shows that it is possible to profit from the arguments used in both the diachronic and the synchronic approach- they are often the same though interpreted differently-in an attempt to offer a plausible sketch of the origin of the book. There appear to bemany good reasons to assume that the book of Judges in its present form can be explained as a bridge that was laid relatively late between the books of Joshua and Samuel. In her recent monograph on Judges 1 Mareike Rake makes a new, impressive effort to explain the inconsistencies, contradictions, and unexpected repetitions the reader comes across in the transition from the book of Joshua to the book of Judges. Keywords: Book of Judges; Deuteronomistic history; Joshua; Samuel","PeriodicalId":141014,"journal":{"name":"The Land of Israel in Bible, History, and Theology","volume":"362 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Joshua To Samuel: Some Remarks On The Origin Of The Book Of Judges\",\"authors\":\"K. Spronk\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/EJ.9789004175150.I-474.58\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The basic problem or challenge a modern commentator on books such as Joshua and Judges faces is that he/she has to take a deliberate stand in the ongoing discussion on the Deuteronomistic history. This chapter shows that it is possible to profit from the arguments used in both the diachronic and the synchronic approach- they are often the same though interpreted differently-in an attempt to offer a plausible sketch of the origin of the book. There appear to bemany good reasons to assume that the book of Judges in its present form can be explained as a bridge that was laid relatively late between the books of Joshua and Samuel. In her recent monograph on Judges 1 Mareike Rake makes a new, impressive effort to explain the inconsistencies, contradictions, and unexpected repetitions the reader comes across in the transition from the book of Joshua to the book of Judges. Keywords: Book of Judges; Deuteronomistic history; Joshua; Samuel\",\"PeriodicalId\":141014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Land of Israel in Bible, History, and Theology\",\"volume\":\"362 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Land of Israel in Bible, History, and Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/EJ.9789004175150.I-474.58\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Land of Israel in Bible, History, and Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/EJ.9789004175150.I-474.58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

像《约书亚记》和《士师记》这样的书的现代评论家所面临的基本问题或挑战是,他/她必须在对《申命记》历史的持续讨论中采取审慎的立场。这一章表明,有可能从历时和共时两种方法中使用的论点中获益——它们通常是相同的,尽管解释不同——试图为本书的起源提供一个可信的草图。似乎有很多很好的理由可以假设,现在的士师记可以解释为约书亚记和撒母耳记之间相对较晚的桥梁。在她最近的关于士师记1的专著中,Mareike Rake做了一个新的,令人印象深刻的努力来解释读者在从约书亚记到士师记的过渡中遇到的不一致,矛盾和意想不到的重复。关键词:士师记;申命记历史;约书亚;撒母耳
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From Joshua To Samuel: Some Remarks On The Origin Of The Book Of Judges
The basic problem or challenge a modern commentator on books such as Joshua and Judges faces is that he/she has to take a deliberate stand in the ongoing discussion on the Deuteronomistic history. This chapter shows that it is possible to profit from the arguments used in both the diachronic and the synchronic approach- they are often the same though interpreted differently-in an attempt to offer a plausible sketch of the origin of the book. There appear to bemany good reasons to assume that the book of Judges in its present form can be explained as a bridge that was laid relatively late between the books of Joshua and Samuel. In her recent monograph on Judges 1 Mareike Rake makes a new, impressive effort to explain the inconsistencies, contradictions, and unexpected repetitions the reader comes across in the transition from the book of Joshua to the book of Judges. Keywords: Book of Judges; Deuteronomistic history; Joshua; Samuel
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信