基于卷积神经网络特征提取的Softmax、线性和二次判别分析的目标识别技术比较研究

Napol Siripibal, S. Supratid, Chaitawatch Sudprasert
{"title":"基于卷积神经网络特征提取的Softmax、线性和二次判别分析的目标识别技术比较研究","authors":"Napol Siripibal, S. Supratid, Chaitawatch Sudprasert","doi":"10.1145/3335550.3335584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a comparison study on using softmax, linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) for object recognition. The least effort is needed for hyper-parameter tuning or selection for all such three classifiers. Convolutional neural network (CNN), using feed-forward-architecture deep learning neural network is employed here for efficient feature extraction and reduction. Then, the extracted, reduced features are fed into the classification comparison. The experiments rely on a small-image CIFAR-10 dataset such that a simple, four convolutional-layer CNN architecture can possibly handle effective feature extraction with hardly over-fitting. Recognition performance evaluations rely on averages of precision, recall, F1 scores and accuracy rates, based on 10-fold cross validation for bias reduction purpose. Such performance measures are implemented under balanced as well as unbalanced --class data, respectively referred to equal and uniform-random-sampling unequal --size class dataset. The results indicate a few bits of recognition performance differences regarding F1 scores as well as accuracy rates among the CNN-LDA, CNN-QDA and CNN-softmax, where the balanced-class and unbalanced-class are separately determined. However, the lowest and the highest of the largest wrong prediction cases are generated by CNN-QDA and CNN-softmax respectively for both balanced and unbalanced-class data.","PeriodicalId":312704,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Management Science and Industrial Engineering - MSIE 2019","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of Object Recognition Techniques: Softmax, Linear and Quadratic Discriminant Analysis Based on Convolutional Neural Network Feature Extraction\",\"authors\":\"Napol Siripibal, S. Supratid, Chaitawatch Sudprasert\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3335550.3335584\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a comparison study on using softmax, linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) for object recognition. The least effort is needed for hyper-parameter tuning or selection for all such three classifiers. Convolutional neural network (CNN), using feed-forward-architecture deep learning neural network is employed here for efficient feature extraction and reduction. Then, the extracted, reduced features are fed into the classification comparison. The experiments rely on a small-image CIFAR-10 dataset such that a simple, four convolutional-layer CNN architecture can possibly handle effective feature extraction with hardly over-fitting. Recognition performance evaluations rely on averages of precision, recall, F1 scores and accuracy rates, based on 10-fold cross validation for bias reduction purpose. Such performance measures are implemented under balanced as well as unbalanced --class data, respectively referred to equal and uniform-random-sampling unequal --size class dataset. The results indicate a few bits of recognition performance differences regarding F1 scores as well as accuracy rates among the CNN-LDA, CNN-QDA and CNN-softmax, where the balanced-class and unbalanced-class are separately determined. However, the lowest and the highest of the largest wrong prediction cases are generated by CNN-QDA and CNN-softmax respectively for both balanced and unbalanced-class data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":312704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Management Science and Industrial Engineering - MSIE 2019\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Management Science and Industrial Engineering - MSIE 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3335550.3335584\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Management Science and Industrial Engineering - MSIE 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3335550.3335584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文对softmax、线性判别分析(LDA)和二次判别分析(QDA)在目标识别中的应用进行了比较研究。这三种分类器的超参数调优或选择需要的工作量最小。本文采用卷积神经网络(CNN),采用前馈结构的深度学习神经网络进行高效的特征提取和约简。然后,将提取的约简特征输入到分类比较中。实验依赖于一个小图像CIFAR-10数据集,这样一个简单的,四卷积层CNN架构可能可以处理有效的特征提取,几乎没有过度拟合。识别性能评估依赖于准确率、召回率、F1分数和准确率的平均值,基于10倍交叉验证以减少偏倚。这些性能测量是在平衡和不平衡类数据下实现的,分别指相等和均匀随机抽样不等大小的类数据集。结果表明,在分别确定平衡类和不平衡类的CNN-LDA、CNN-QDA和CNN-softmax之间,在F1分数和准确率方面存在一些识别性能差异。然而,对于平衡类和非平衡类数据,CNN-QDA和CNN-softmax分别生成了最大错误预测案例中的最低和最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Study of Object Recognition Techniques: Softmax, Linear and Quadratic Discriminant Analysis Based on Convolutional Neural Network Feature Extraction
This paper presents a comparison study on using softmax, linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) for object recognition. The least effort is needed for hyper-parameter tuning or selection for all such three classifiers. Convolutional neural network (CNN), using feed-forward-architecture deep learning neural network is employed here for efficient feature extraction and reduction. Then, the extracted, reduced features are fed into the classification comparison. The experiments rely on a small-image CIFAR-10 dataset such that a simple, four convolutional-layer CNN architecture can possibly handle effective feature extraction with hardly over-fitting. Recognition performance evaluations rely on averages of precision, recall, F1 scores and accuracy rates, based on 10-fold cross validation for bias reduction purpose. Such performance measures are implemented under balanced as well as unbalanced --class data, respectively referred to equal and uniform-random-sampling unequal --size class dataset. The results indicate a few bits of recognition performance differences regarding F1 scores as well as accuracy rates among the CNN-LDA, CNN-QDA and CNN-softmax, where the balanced-class and unbalanced-class are separately determined. However, the lowest and the highest of the largest wrong prediction cases are generated by CNN-QDA and CNN-softmax respectively for both balanced and unbalanced-class data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信