应用科学Ādāb al-Baḥth wa al-Munāẓ方向问题上俄文'yah所有āh

Mohd Saiful Aqil Naim Saful Amin, Syed Mohammad Hilmi Syed Abdul Rahman
{"title":"应用科学Ādāb al-Baḥth wa al-Munāẓ方向问题上俄文'yah所有āh","authors":"Mohd Saiful Aqil Naim Saful Amin, Syed Mohammad Hilmi Syed Abdul Rahman","doi":"10.22452/usuluddin.vol50no2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The issue of ru’yah Allāh is an issue of belief that has long been a place in the debate stage of scholars across sects and streams since the second century of Hijrah. Among the sects that are the main rivals of the Ahl al-Sunnah wa al-Jamā'ah sect on this issue is al-Mu'tazilah who deny the necessity of ru’yah Allāh either in this world or in the hereafter by using the argument of revelation, reason and language. This issue is very important to pay attention to because it involves an important faith debate. Scholars of Ahl al-Sunnah wa al-Jamā'ah wa al-Jamā'ah such as al-Abū al-Ḥasan al-Ash'arī (d. 323 H), Abū Ḥāmid al-Ghazālī (d. 505 H), Sa' ad al-Dīn al-Taftāzānī (d. 792 H) and Muḥammad al-Sanūsī (d. 895 H) interacted with them in the form of dialectic and debate centered on the methodology of ādāb al-baḥth wa al-munāẓarah science. Therefore, this study was written to examine the application of ādāb al-baḥth knowledge practiced by the scientist in the issue of ru'yah Allāh to identify the significance of this knowledge in arguing and upholding the truth. This study goes through the process of content analysis of scholarly documents in the science of faith to obtain relevant information. The study found that the methods applied have an important role in disentangling the arguments used, unraveling the errors in arguments and proving the truth of a claim related to the issue of ru’yah Allāh thus helping to break arguments that contradict the Quran and the Sunnah.","PeriodicalId":144531,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Usuluddin","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aplikasi Ilmu Ādāb al-Baḥth wa al-Munāẓarah dalam Isu Ru’yah Allāh\",\"authors\":\"Mohd Saiful Aqil Naim Saful Amin, Syed Mohammad Hilmi Syed Abdul Rahman\",\"doi\":\"10.22452/usuluddin.vol50no2.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The issue of ru’yah Allāh is an issue of belief that has long been a place in the debate stage of scholars across sects and streams since the second century of Hijrah. Among the sects that are the main rivals of the Ahl al-Sunnah wa al-Jamā'ah sect on this issue is al-Mu'tazilah who deny the necessity of ru’yah Allāh either in this world or in the hereafter by using the argument of revelation, reason and language. This issue is very important to pay attention to because it involves an important faith debate. Scholars of Ahl al-Sunnah wa al-Jamā'ah wa al-Jamā'ah such as al-Abū al-Ḥasan al-Ash'arī (d. 323 H), Abū Ḥāmid al-Ghazālī (d. 505 H), Sa' ad al-Dīn al-Taftāzānī (d. 792 H) and Muḥammad al-Sanūsī (d. 895 H) interacted with them in the form of dialectic and debate centered on the methodology of ādāb al-baḥth wa al-munāẓarah science. Therefore, this study was written to examine the application of ādāb al-baḥth knowledge practiced by the scientist in the issue of ru'yah Allāh to identify the significance of this knowledge in arguing and upholding the truth. This study goes through the process of content analysis of scholarly documents in the science of faith to obtain relevant information. The study found that the methods applied have an important role in disentangling the arguments used, unraveling the errors in arguments and proving the truth of a claim related to the issue of ru’yah Allāh thus helping to break arguments that contradict the Quran and the Sunnah.\",\"PeriodicalId\":144531,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Usuluddin\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Usuluddin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22452/usuluddin.vol50no2.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Usuluddin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/usuluddin.vol50no2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

ruyyah Allāh的问题是一个信仰问题,自第二个世纪的Hijrah以来,一直是各教派和各流派学者争论的焦点。在这个问题上,与圣训教(Ahl al-Sunnah wa al- jamir 'ah)主要竞争的教派之一是al-Mu'tazilah,他们用启示、理性和语言的论点否认鲁亚Allāh在今世或来世的必要性。这个问题非常值得关注,因为它涉及到一场重要的信仰辩论。Ahl al- sunnah wa al- jamir 'ah wa al- jamir 'ah的学者,如al- abal -Ḥasan al- ash 'ar ā(公元323年),abal Ḥāmid al-Ghazālī(公元505年),Sa' ad al- d n al-Taftāzānī(公元792年)和Muḥammad al-Sanūsī(公元895年)以ādāb al-baḥth wa al-munāẓarah科学方法论为中心的辩证法和辩论的形式与他们互动。因此,本研究的目的是考察科学家在儒雅问题Allāh中实践的ādāb al-baḥth知识的应用,以确定这种知识在争论和坚持真理方面的意义。本研究通过对信仰科学学术文献进行内容分析的过程,获取相关信息。研究发现,所采用的方法在解开所使用的论点,揭示论点中的错误和证明与鲁耶Allāh问题有关的主张的真实性方面发挥了重要作用,从而有助于打破与古兰经和圣训相矛盾的论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aplikasi Ilmu Ādāb al-Baḥth wa al-Munāẓarah dalam Isu Ru’yah Allāh
The issue of ru’yah Allāh is an issue of belief that has long been a place in the debate stage of scholars across sects and streams since the second century of Hijrah. Among the sects that are the main rivals of the Ahl al-Sunnah wa al-Jamā'ah sect on this issue is al-Mu'tazilah who deny the necessity of ru’yah Allāh either in this world or in the hereafter by using the argument of revelation, reason and language. This issue is very important to pay attention to because it involves an important faith debate. Scholars of Ahl al-Sunnah wa al-Jamā'ah wa al-Jamā'ah such as al-Abū al-Ḥasan al-Ash'arī (d. 323 H), Abū Ḥāmid al-Ghazālī (d. 505 H), Sa' ad al-Dīn al-Taftāzānī (d. 792 H) and Muḥammad al-Sanūsī (d. 895 H) interacted with them in the form of dialectic and debate centered on the methodology of ādāb al-baḥth wa al-munāẓarah science. Therefore, this study was written to examine the application of ādāb al-baḥth knowledge practiced by the scientist in the issue of ru'yah Allāh to identify the significance of this knowledge in arguing and upholding the truth. This study goes through the process of content analysis of scholarly documents in the science of faith to obtain relevant information. The study found that the methods applied have an important role in disentangling the arguments used, unraveling the errors in arguments and proving the truth of a claim related to the issue of ru’yah Allāh thus helping to break arguments that contradict the Quran and the Sunnah.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信