{"title":"强制、禁止与远大期望:欧洲共同庇护制度的持续失败","authors":"M. den Heijer, J. Rijpma, T. Spijkerboer","doi":"10.54648/cola2016059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This contribution explains the European asylum policy crisis from three structural weaknesses of the Common European Asylum System: its reliance on coercion within the EU, its unrealistic expectations of what borders can achieve and the premise of prohibition of refugee movement in its external dimension. The article then critically reviews the proposals that the EU has submitted since the publication of the European Migration Agenda in May 2015, in the light of recent developments.","PeriodicalId":169556,"journal":{"name":"Culture Area Studies eJournal","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"77","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coercion, Prohibition, and Great Expectations: The Continuing Failure of the Common European Asylum System\",\"authors\":\"M. den Heijer, J. Rijpma, T. Spijkerboer\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/cola2016059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This contribution explains the European asylum policy crisis from three structural weaknesses of the Common European Asylum System: its reliance on coercion within the EU, its unrealistic expectations of what borders can achieve and the premise of prohibition of refugee movement in its external dimension. The article then critically reviews the proposals that the EU has submitted since the publication of the European Migration Agenda in May 2015, in the light of recent developments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":169556,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Culture Area Studies eJournal\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"77\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Culture Area Studies eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2016059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture Area Studies eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2016059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Coercion, Prohibition, and Great Expectations: The Continuing Failure of the Common European Asylum System
This contribution explains the European asylum policy crisis from three structural weaknesses of the Common European Asylum System: its reliance on coercion within the EU, its unrealistic expectations of what borders can achieve and the premise of prohibition of refugee movement in its external dimension. The article then critically reviews the proposals that the EU has submitted since the publication of the European Migration Agenda in May 2015, in the light of recent developments.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
