大规模伤亡事件应对:医院药剂师准备水平的评估

U. Eze, Omolara F. Adebisi, Onyinye J. Uwaezuoke, S. Saka, M. Femi-oyewo, B. Ogbonna, Samuel A Lawal, Adaeze G. Eze
{"title":"大规模伤亡事件应对:医院药剂师准备水平的评估","authors":"U. Eze, Omolara F. Adebisi, Onyinye J. Uwaezuoke, S. Saka, M. Femi-oyewo, B. Ogbonna, Samuel A Lawal, Adaeze G. Eze","doi":"10.25259/ajpps_2023_010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nMass casualty incidents (MCIs) and outcomes depend on the resources of the admitting institutions and their preparedness, respectively. We assessed the preparedness of hospital pharmacists for MCIs.\n\n\n\nA cross-sectional survey was conducted among 132 pharmacists working in hospitals in Ogun State, Southwestern Nigeria, over 1 month, using a 26-item self-administered questionnaire. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS, version 21). A Chi-square test was used for further analysis. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant.\n\n\n\nThe response rate was 79.5% (105/132). Most respondents were 26–30 years, 31.4%, had been practicing for <10 years, 44.8%, and were female, 59.0%. Overall, 42.9% of the respondents had >400 beds, 66 (62.9%), and 48 (45.7%) had general and pharmacy-specific disaster preparedness plans, respectively. Respondents agreed that the hospital committee consensus determined medications to be stocked, 64 (60.9%) and that disaster plans were mainly for natural disasters, 73 (35.4%). Only 7 (6.6%) respondents practiced mock disaster preparedness. There was a significant association between respondents’ year of practice and response on including disaster events in the institutional plan (χ2 = 95.637, df. = 72, P = 0.033). Most respondents, 95 (90.0%), were positive (mean ± SD: 4.42 ± 0.875) about the need for analgesics during disaster events.\n\n\n\nPreparation for disaster preparedness was suboptimal based on the number of beds, pharmacy-specific disaster preparedness plan, and practice for mock disasters. This calls for immediate awareness to address these shortfalls through orientation, training, and retraining on preparedness for MCIs.\n","PeriodicalId":376259,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":"46 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mass casualty incident response: Assessment of the level of preparedness among hospital pharmacists\",\"authors\":\"U. Eze, Omolara F. Adebisi, Onyinye J. Uwaezuoke, S. Saka, M. Femi-oyewo, B. Ogbonna, Samuel A Lawal, Adaeze G. Eze\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/ajpps_2023_010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nMass casualty incidents (MCIs) and outcomes depend on the resources of the admitting institutions and their preparedness, respectively. We assessed the preparedness of hospital pharmacists for MCIs.\\n\\n\\n\\nA cross-sectional survey was conducted among 132 pharmacists working in hospitals in Ogun State, Southwestern Nigeria, over 1 month, using a 26-item self-administered questionnaire. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS, version 21). A Chi-square test was used for further analysis. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant.\\n\\n\\n\\nThe response rate was 79.5% (105/132). Most respondents were 26–30 years, 31.4%, had been practicing for <10 years, 44.8%, and were female, 59.0%. Overall, 42.9% of the respondents had >400 beds, 66 (62.9%), and 48 (45.7%) had general and pharmacy-specific disaster preparedness plans, respectively. Respondents agreed that the hospital committee consensus determined medications to be stocked, 64 (60.9%) and that disaster plans were mainly for natural disasters, 73 (35.4%). Only 7 (6.6%) respondents practiced mock disaster preparedness. There was a significant association between respondents’ year of practice and response on including disaster events in the institutional plan (χ2 = 95.637, df. = 72, P = 0.033). Most respondents, 95 (90.0%), were positive (mean ± SD: 4.42 ± 0.875) about the need for analgesics during disaster events.\\n\\n\\n\\nPreparation for disaster preparedness was suboptimal based on the number of beds, pharmacy-specific disaster preparedness plan, and practice for mock disasters. This calls for immediate awareness to address these shortfalls through orientation, training, and retraining on preparedness for MCIs.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":376259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmaceutical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"46 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmaceutical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/ajpps_2023_010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/ajpps_2023_010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大规模伤亡事件的发生和结果分别取决于收容机构的资源和他们的准备情况。我们评估了医院药剂师对MCIs的准备情况。对在尼日利亚西南部奥贡州医院工作的132名药剂师进行了为期1个多月的横断面调查,使用了一份26项自填问卷。数据分析使用统计软件包的社会科学(SPSS,版本21)。进一步分析采用卡方检验。p400张床位、66张(62.9%)和48张(45.7%)分别有一般备灾计划和特定药房备灾计划。受访者同意医院委员会共识确定药品储备的有64人(60.9%),同意灾害预案主要针对自然灾害的有73人(35.4%)。只有7个(6.6%)受访者进行了模拟备灾。调查对象的实践年份与将灾害事件纳入机构计划的反应之间存在显著关联(χ2 = 95.637, df。= 72, p = 0.033)。95名(90.0%)受访者对灾难事件中是否需要镇痛药的回答呈阳性(平均值±SD: 4.42±0.875)。基于床位数量、特定药房的灾难准备计划和模拟灾难的实践,灾难准备的准备是次优的。这需要立即意识到,通过关于MCIs准备的指导、培训和再培训来解决这些不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mass casualty incident response: Assessment of the level of preparedness among hospital pharmacists
Mass casualty incidents (MCIs) and outcomes depend on the resources of the admitting institutions and their preparedness, respectively. We assessed the preparedness of hospital pharmacists for MCIs. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 132 pharmacists working in hospitals in Ogun State, Southwestern Nigeria, over 1 month, using a 26-item self-administered questionnaire. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS, version 21). A Chi-square test was used for further analysis. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The response rate was 79.5% (105/132). Most respondents were 26–30 years, 31.4%, had been practicing for <10 years, 44.8%, and were female, 59.0%. Overall, 42.9% of the respondents had >400 beds, 66 (62.9%), and 48 (45.7%) had general and pharmacy-specific disaster preparedness plans, respectively. Respondents agreed that the hospital committee consensus determined medications to be stocked, 64 (60.9%) and that disaster plans were mainly for natural disasters, 73 (35.4%). Only 7 (6.6%) respondents practiced mock disaster preparedness. There was a significant association between respondents’ year of practice and response on including disaster events in the institutional plan (χ2 = 95.637, df. = 72, P = 0.033). Most respondents, 95 (90.0%), were positive (mean ± SD: 4.42 ± 0.875) about the need for analgesics during disaster events. Preparation for disaster preparedness was suboptimal based on the number of beds, pharmacy-specific disaster preparedness plan, and practice for mock disasters. This calls for immediate awareness to address these shortfalls through orientation, training, and retraining on preparedness for MCIs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信