弹性牧场在农场规模上实现环境成果的属性

C. D. de Klein, R. Monaghan, Mitchell Donovan, A. Wall, L. Schipper, I. Pinxterhuis
{"title":"弹性牧场在农场规模上实现环境成果的属性","authors":"C. D. de Klein, R. Monaghan, Mitchell Donovan, A. Wall, L. Schipper, I. Pinxterhuis","doi":"10.33584/rps.17.2021.3487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pasture resilience commonly refers to a pasture’s ability to withstand or rebound from pressures to maintain production and quality of sown species. We suggest that a broader definition of pasture resilience is needed that also includes environmental responses, thus ensuring that productivity and environmental outcomes are considered together. Key attributes of resilient pastures to minimise soil erosion and nutrient, greenhouse gas and soil carbon losses are summarised based on current understanding of environmental losses from pastoral systems. These attributes include maintaining consistent pasture cover, high energy and/or low nitrogen species and species diversity that provides complementary root morphology and/or growth seasonality; all are likely to have positive benefits for production and productivity. There is a potential tension, however, between productivity and methane emissions, as methane production increases with increased feed intake. Increasing pasture quality is therefore also an important consideration for pasture resilience as it can maintain animal productivity at lower levels of feed intake. From a farm systems perspective, the choice of pasture species should reflect the desired attributes for both productivity and environmental outcomes, and ensure that the sown species persist in the sward. Finally, we note that none of the environmental attributes/benefits are likely to deliver major farm-scale improvements on their own; progress will likely be incremental improvements upon implementing a range of attributes.","PeriodicalId":407057,"journal":{"name":"NZGA: Research and Practice Series","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attributes of resilient pasture for achieving environmental outcomes at farm scale\",\"authors\":\"C. D. de Klein, R. Monaghan, Mitchell Donovan, A. Wall, L. Schipper, I. Pinxterhuis\",\"doi\":\"10.33584/rps.17.2021.3487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Pasture resilience commonly refers to a pasture’s ability to withstand or rebound from pressures to maintain production and quality of sown species. We suggest that a broader definition of pasture resilience is needed that also includes environmental responses, thus ensuring that productivity and environmental outcomes are considered together. Key attributes of resilient pastures to minimise soil erosion and nutrient, greenhouse gas and soil carbon losses are summarised based on current understanding of environmental losses from pastoral systems. These attributes include maintaining consistent pasture cover, high energy and/or low nitrogen species and species diversity that provides complementary root morphology and/or growth seasonality; all are likely to have positive benefits for production and productivity. There is a potential tension, however, between productivity and methane emissions, as methane production increases with increased feed intake. Increasing pasture quality is therefore also an important consideration for pasture resilience as it can maintain animal productivity at lower levels of feed intake. From a farm systems perspective, the choice of pasture species should reflect the desired attributes for both productivity and environmental outcomes, and ensure that the sown species persist in the sward. Finally, we note that none of the environmental attributes/benefits are likely to deliver major farm-scale improvements on their own; progress will likely be incremental improvements upon implementing a range of attributes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":407057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NZGA: Research and Practice Series\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NZGA: Research and Practice Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33584/rps.17.2021.3487\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NZGA: Research and Practice Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33584/rps.17.2021.3487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

牧草恢复力通常是指牧草承受压力或从压力中恢复以保持播种品种的产量和质量的能力。我们建议需要一个更广泛的牧场恢复力定义,包括环境响应,从而确保生产力和环境结果一起考虑。根据目前对放牧系统环境损失的认识,总结了弹性牧场在减少土壤侵蚀和养分、温室气体和土壤碳损失方面的关键属性。这些属性包括维持稳定的牧草覆盖、高能量和/或低氮物种以及提供互补根系形态和/或生长季节性的物种多样性;所有这些都可能对生产和生产力有积极的好处。然而,在生产力和甲烷排放之间存在潜在的紧张关系,因为甲烷产量随着采食量的增加而增加。因此,提高牧草质量也是牧草恢复力的一个重要考虑因素,因为它可以在较低采食量水平下保持动物生产力。从农业系统的角度来看,牧草品种的选择应反映生产力和环境结果的期望属性,并确保播种品种在草地上持续存在。最后,我们注意到,这些环境属性/效益都不可能单独带来重大的农场规模的改善;进度可能是在实现一系列属性的基础上的增量改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Attributes of resilient pasture for achieving environmental outcomes at farm scale
Pasture resilience commonly refers to a pasture’s ability to withstand or rebound from pressures to maintain production and quality of sown species. We suggest that a broader definition of pasture resilience is needed that also includes environmental responses, thus ensuring that productivity and environmental outcomes are considered together. Key attributes of resilient pastures to minimise soil erosion and nutrient, greenhouse gas and soil carbon losses are summarised based on current understanding of environmental losses from pastoral systems. These attributes include maintaining consistent pasture cover, high energy and/or low nitrogen species and species diversity that provides complementary root morphology and/or growth seasonality; all are likely to have positive benefits for production and productivity. There is a potential tension, however, between productivity and methane emissions, as methane production increases with increased feed intake. Increasing pasture quality is therefore also an important consideration for pasture resilience as it can maintain animal productivity at lower levels of feed intake. From a farm systems perspective, the choice of pasture species should reflect the desired attributes for both productivity and environmental outcomes, and ensure that the sown species persist in the sward. Finally, we note that none of the environmental attributes/benefits are likely to deliver major farm-scale improvements on their own; progress will likely be incremental improvements upon implementing a range of attributes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信