单切口腹腔镜阑尾切除术循证患者选择的建议

N. Vettoretto, A. Ismail, Giovanetti Maurizio
{"title":"单切口腹腔镜阑尾切除术循证患者选择的建议","authors":"N. Vettoretto, A. Ismail, Giovanetti Maurizio","doi":"10.5812/JMISS.7185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Single incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) is gaining interest in the surgical community, as the procedure is possibly easier than single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC), without the potential boost of iatrogenic injuries which might characterize the initial series and the learning curve (1). Anyway, even the rate of overall morbidity for SILA might be higher than that of classical laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) (2). These numbers force to restrict the application of SILA to highly selected patients in which the benefits of a single access overweight the possible disadvantages in terms of morbidity. Clinical evidence and consensus development conferences have stated, so far, Grade A recommendation for LA only in pre-menopausal women, and its application in complicated appendicitis is still debated (3). Different devices have been approved for the use in singleincision surgery, but the cheaper and effective seems to be the “glove-port” (4). The obvious lack of triangulation is a minor problem in a mobile organ like the appendix is, but it can be bypassed with the use of a suspension for the appendix (trans-parietal stitches or supplemental miniport) or with flexible and angulated instruments. Although most of the procedures can be completed with a standard LA instrumentation, it surely implies a learning curve for the surgeon, who can be forced to a new crosshanded or left-handed dissection and has to deal with an annoying conflict between hands and stalks: this issue is ameliorated with the use of 5 mm-30 degrees cameras, which, although, carry a slight minor quality of the intraoperative vision, and (like in needlescopy) might compromise the result in complicated cases (5). On the basis of these considerations founded on the existing evidence, in our surgical unit we established strict criteria of inclusion in scheduling single port-appendectomy. This protocol has been started as LA has become the rule Published by Kowsar Corp, 2013. cc 3.0.","PeriodicalId":158928,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgical Sciences","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Proposal for an Evidence-Based Patients' Selection in Single Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy\",\"authors\":\"N. Vettoretto, A. Ismail, Giovanetti Maurizio\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/JMISS.7185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Single incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) is gaining interest in the surgical community, as the procedure is possibly easier than single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC), without the potential boost of iatrogenic injuries which might characterize the initial series and the learning curve (1). Anyway, even the rate of overall morbidity for SILA might be higher than that of classical laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) (2). These numbers force to restrict the application of SILA to highly selected patients in which the benefits of a single access overweight the possible disadvantages in terms of morbidity. Clinical evidence and consensus development conferences have stated, so far, Grade A recommendation for LA only in pre-menopausal women, and its application in complicated appendicitis is still debated (3). Different devices have been approved for the use in singleincision surgery, but the cheaper and effective seems to be the “glove-port” (4). The obvious lack of triangulation is a minor problem in a mobile organ like the appendix is, but it can be bypassed with the use of a suspension for the appendix (trans-parietal stitches or supplemental miniport) or with flexible and angulated instruments. Although most of the procedures can be completed with a standard LA instrumentation, it surely implies a learning curve for the surgeon, who can be forced to a new crosshanded or left-handed dissection and has to deal with an annoying conflict between hands and stalks: this issue is ameliorated with the use of 5 mm-30 degrees cameras, which, although, carry a slight minor quality of the intraoperative vision, and (like in needlescopy) might compromise the result in complicated cases (5). On the basis of these considerations founded on the existing evidence, in our surgical unit we established strict criteria of inclusion in scheduling single port-appendectomy. This protocol has been started as LA has become the rule Published by Kowsar Corp, 2013. cc 3.0.\",\"PeriodicalId\":158928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/JMISS.7185\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/JMISS.7185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

单切口腹腔镜阑尾切除术(SILA)正在引起外科医学界的兴趣,因为该手术可能比单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)更容易,没有潜在的医源性损伤,这可能是最初系列和学习曲线的特征(1)。甚至SILA的总体发病率也可能高于传统的腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)(2)。这些数字迫使将SILA的应用限制在高度选定的患者中,其中单一通道的好处超过了发病率方面可能存在的缺点。临床证据和共识发展会议表明,到目前为止,LA的A级推荐仅用于绝经前妇女,其在复杂阑尾炎中的应用仍存在争议(3)。不同的设备已被批准用于单切口手术,但更便宜和有效的似乎是“手套口”(4)。对于像阑尾这样的移动器官来说,缺乏三角测量是一个小问题。但它可以通过使用阑尾悬吊(经顶骨缝合或补充微孔)或灵活和有角度的器械绕过。虽然大多数手术都可以用标准的LA器械完成,但对于外科医生来说,这无疑意味着一个学习曲线,他们可能被迫进行新的交叉或左手解剖,并且必须处理手和柄之间令人讨厌的冲突。使用5 mm-30度相机可以改善这一问题,尽管术中视力质量轻微,并且(像针刺一样)可能会影响复杂病例的结果(5)。基于这些基于现有证据的考虑,在我们的外科部门,我们建立了严格的纳入标准,以安排单端口阑尾切除术。该协议已经启动,因为LA已经成为规则,由Kowsar公司发布,2013年。3.0 cc。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Proposal for an Evidence-Based Patients' Selection in Single Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Single incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) is gaining interest in the surgical community, as the procedure is possibly easier than single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC), without the potential boost of iatrogenic injuries which might characterize the initial series and the learning curve (1). Anyway, even the rate of overall morbidity for SILA might be higher than that of classical laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) (2). These numbers force to restrict the application of SILA to highly selected patients in which the benefits of a single access overweight the possible disadvantages in terms of morbidity. Clinical evidence and consensus development conferences have stated, so far, Grade A recommendation for LA only in pre-menopausal women, and its application in complicated appendicitis is still debated (3). Different devices have been approved for the use in singleincision surgery, but the cheaper and effective seems to be the “glove-port” (4). The obvious lack of triangulation is a minor problem in a mobile organ like the appendix is, but it can be bypassed with the use of a suspension for the appendix (trans-parietal stitches or supplemental miniport) or with flexible and angulated instruments. Although most of the procedures can be completed with a standard LA instrumentation, it surely implies a learning curve for the surgeon, who can be forced to a new crosshanded or left-handed dissection and has to deal with an annoying conflict between hands and stalks: this issue is ameliorated with the use of 5 mm-30 degrees cameras, which, although, carry a slight minor quality of the intraoperative vision, and (like in needlescopy) might compromise the result in complicated cases (5). On the basis of these considerations founded on the existing evidence, in our surgical unit we established strict criteria of inclusion in scheduling single port-appendectomy. This protocol has been started as LA has become the rule Published by Kowsar Corp, 2013. cc 3.0.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信