可解释的自动化:个性化和自适应的用户界面,以促进对驾驶自动化系统的信任和理解

Philipp Wintersberger, Hannah Nicklas, Thomas Martlbauer, Stephan Hammer, A. Riener
{"title":"可解释的自动化:个性化和自适应的用户界面,以促进对驾驶自动化系统的信任和理解","authors":"Philipp Wintersberger, Hannah Nicklas, Thomas Martlbauer, Stephan Hammer, A. Riener","doi":"10.1145/3409120.3410659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent research indicates that transparent information on the behavior of automated vehicles positively affects trust, but how such feedback should be composed and if user trust influences the amount of desired feedback is relatively unexplored. Consequently, we conducted an interview study with (N=56) participants, who were presented different videos of an automated vehicle from the ego-perspective. Subjects rated their trust in the vehicle in these situations and could arbitrarily select objects in the driving environment that should be included in augmented reality feedback systems, so that they are able to trust the vehicle and understand its actions. The results show an inverse correlation between situational trust and participants’ desire for feedback and further reveal reasons why certain objects should be included in feedback systems. The study also highlights the need for more adaptive in-vehicle interfaces for trust calibration and outlines necessary steps for automatically generating feedback in the future.","PeriodicalId":373501,"journal":{"name":"12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explainable Automation: Personalized and Adaptive UIs to Foster Trust and Understanding of Driving Automation Systems\",\"authors\":\"Philipp Wintersberger, Hannah Nicklas, Thomas Martlbauer, Stephan Hammer, A. Riener\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3409120.3410659\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent research indicates that transparent information on the behavior of automated vehicles positively affects trust, but how such feedback should be composed and if user trust influences the amount of desired feedback is relatively unexplored. Consequently, we conducted an interview study with (N=56) participants, who were presented different videos of an automated vehicle from the ego-perspective. Subjects rated their trust in the vehicle in these situations and could arbitrarily select objects in the driving environment that should be included in augmented reality feedback systems, so that they are able to trust the vehicle and understand its actions. The results show an inverse correlation between situational trust and participants’ desire for feedback and further reveal reasons why certain objects should be included in feedback systems. The study also highlights the need for more adaptive in-vehicle interfaces for trust calibration and outlines necessary steps for automatically generating feedback in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":373501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"32\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3409120.3410659\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3409120.3410659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

摘要

最近的研究表明,关于自动驾驶车辆行为的透明信息对信任有积极的影响,但这种反馈应该如何组成,以及用户信任是否会影响期望反馈的数量,这些都是相对未被探索的。因此,我们对(N=56)名参与者进行了访谈研究,从自我的角度向他们展示了自动驾驶汽车的不同视频。在这些情况下,受试者对车辆的信任度进行评分,并可以任意选择驾驶环境中应该包含在增强现实反馈系统中的物体,以便他们能够信任车辆并理解其行为。结果显示情境信任与参与者对反馈的渴望呈负相关,并进一步揭示了某些对象应该被纳入反馈系统的原因。该研究还强调了对更多自适应车载信任校准接口的需求,并概述了未来自动生成反馈的必要步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Explainable Automation: Personalized and Adaptive UIs to Foster Trust and Understanding of Driving Automation Systems
Recent research indicates that transparent information on the behavior of automated vehicles positively affects trust, but how such feedback should be composed and if user trust influences the amount of desired feedback is relatively unexplored. Consequently, we conducted an interview study with (N=56) participants, who were presented different videos of an automated vehicle from the ego-perspective. Subjects rated their trust in the vehicle in these situations and could arbitrarily select objects in the driving environment that should be included in augmented reality feedback systems, so that they are able to trust the vehicle and understand its actions. The results show an inverse correlation between situational trust and participants’ desire for feedback and further reveal reasons why certain objects should be included in feedback systems. The study also highlights the need for more adaptive in-vehicle interfaces for trust calibration and outlines necessary steps for automatically generating feedback in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信