生物医学图像无损压缩中不同二维预测因子的比较分析

Urvashi, Emjee Puthooran, M. Sood
{"title":"生物医学图像无损压缩中不同二维预测因子的比较分析","authors":"Urvashi, Emjee Puthooran, M. Sood","doi":"10.1109/PDGC.2018.8745809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hospitals and clinical environments are moving towards computerization and digitization and the volume of digital images generated for medical diagnosis is extremely large, dealing with images of increasing resolution. The increase in resolution requires a growing amount of medical image data to be stored, processed and transmitted through network efficiently. Therefore, compression techniques are indispensible for archival and communication of medical images. Predictive based coding techniques are explored in this paper for better compression and reconstruction as it performs well for lossless compression. This paper gives a comparative analysis of predictor coding efficiency and complexity on medical images of different modalities. It was observed that among different predictors Gradient Edge Detection (GED) predictor gave better results than Median Edge Detector (MED). It also achieves approximately the same root mean square error (RMSE) and entropy as Gradient Adaptive Predictor (GAP) with less complexity.","PeriodicalId":303401,"journal":{"name":"2018 Fifth International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing (PDGC)","volume":"2015 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Different 2D Predictors for Lossless Compression of Biomedical Images\",\"authors\":\"Urvashi, Emjee Puthooran, M. Sood\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PDGC.2018.8745809\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Hospitals and clinical environments are moving towards computerization and digitization and the volume of digital images generated for medical diagnosis is extremely large, dealing with images of increasing resolution. The increase in resolution requires a growing amount of medical image data to be stored, processed and transmitted through network efficiently. Therefore, compression techniques are indispensible for archival and communication of medical images. Predictive based coding techniques are explored in this paper for better compression and reconstruction as it performs well for lossless compression. This paper gives a comparative analysis of predictor coding efficiency and complexity on medical images of different modalities. It was observed that among different predictors Gradient Edge Detection (GED) predictor gave better results than Median Edge Detector (MED). It also achieves approximately the same root mean square error (RMSE) and entropy as Gradient Adaptive Predictor (GAP) with less complexity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":303401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 Fifth International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing (PDGC)\",\"volume\":\"2015 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 Fifth International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing (PDGC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PDGC.2018.8745809\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Fifth International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing (PDGC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PDGC.2018.8745809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医院和临床环境正朝着计算机化和数字化的方向发展,为医疗诊断产生的数字图像量非常大,处理的图像分辨率越来越高。随着分辨率的提高,越来越多的医学图像数据需要通过网络进行高效的存储、处理和传输。因此,压缩技术对于医学图像的存档和传输是必不可少的。基于预测的编码技术在无损压缩中表现良好,因此本文对基于预测的编码技术进行了探索,以获得更好的压缩和重构效果。对比分析了不同模式医学图像的预测器编码效率和复杂度。在不同的预测因子中,梯度边缘检测(GED)预测因子的预测效果优于中值边缘检测(MED)。它还可以实现与梯度自适应预测器(GAP)近似相同的均方根误差(RMSE)和熵,但复杂性更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of Different 2D Predictors for Lossless Compression of Biomedical Images
Hospitals and clinical environments are moving towards computerization and digitization and the volume of digital images generated for medical diagnosis is extremely large, dealing with images of increasing resolution. The increase in resolution requires a growing amount of medical image data to be stored, processed and transmitted through network efficiently. Therefore, compression techniques are indispensible for archival and communication of medical images. Predictive based coding techniques are explored in this paper for better compression and reconstruction as it performs well for lossless compression. This paper gives a comparative analysis of predictor coding efficiency and complexity on medical images of different modalities. It was observed that among different predictors Gradient Edge Detection (GED) predictor gave better results than Median Edge Detector (MED). It also achieves approximately the same root mean square error (RMSE) and entropy as Gradient Adaptive Predictor (GAP) with less complexity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信