股票价格预测技术的比较分析

Kuldeep Singh, M. Thapliyal, V. Barthwal
{"title":"股票价格预测技术的比较分析","authors":"Kuldeep Singh, M. Thapliyal, V. Barthwal","doi":"10.1109/ICCCS55188.2022.10079696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stock index futures are difficult to forecast due to unpredictable stock market conditions. Despite this fact, efforts are being made over the years to create an efficient forecasting tool. The current advancements in technology like machine learning and artificial intelligence have improved our performance with non-linear estimation. Here, the non-linear, RNN (Recurrence Neural Networks) -based stock index prediction model has been compared to the linear, technical indicator-based stock index prediction model. In our empirical research, ten years of day-wise close price data of Tata Consultancy Services Ltd has been used. The study explores two separate methods for predicting stock prices, each coming from a distinct specialty: In the linear model, MA (moving average) and EMA (exponential moving average) model, and the nonlinear model LSTM (long short-term memory) approach has been used. The analysis shows that when it comes to stock price prediction, the exponential moving average outperforms the LSTM.","PeriodicalId":149615,"journal":{"name":"2022 7th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Security (ICCCS)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative analysis of stock price prediction techniques\",\"authors\":\"Kuldeep Singh, M. Thapliyal, V. Barthwal\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCCS55188.2022.10079696\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Stock index futures are difficult to forecast due to unpredictable stock market conditions. Despite this fact, efforts are being made over the years to create an efficient forecasting tool. The current advancements in technology like machine learning and artificial intelligence have improved our performance with non-linear estimation. Here, the non-linear, RNN (Recurrence Neural Networks) -based stock index prediction model has been compared to the linear, technical indicator-based stock index prediction model. In our empirical research, ten years of day-wise close price data of Tata Consultancy Services Ltd has been used. The study explores two separate methods for predicting stock prices, each coming from a distinct specialty: In the linear model, MA (moving average) and EMA (exponential moving average) model, and the nonlinear model LSTM (long short-term memory) approach has been used. The analysis shows that when it comes to stock price prediction, the exponential moving average outperforms the LSTM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":149615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 7th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Security (ICCCS)\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 7th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Security (ICCCS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCS55188.2022.10079696\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 7th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Security (ICCCS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCS55188.2022.10079696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于股市行情难以预测,股指期货很难预测。尽管如此,多年来仍在努力创造一种有效的预报工具。当前机器学习和人工智能等技术的进步提高了我们在非线性估计方面的表现。本文将基于递归神经网络(RNN)的非线性股指预测模型与基于技术指标的线性股指预测模型进行了比较。在我们的实证研究中,使用了塔塔咨询服务有限公司10年的日间收盘价数据。该研究探讨了两种独立的预测股票价格的方法,每种方法都来自不同的专业:在线性模型中,MA(移动平均)和EMA(指数移动平均)模型,以及非线性模型LSTM(长短期记忆)方法已被使用。分析表明,在股价预测方面,指数移动平均优于LSTM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative analysis of stock price prediction techniques
Stock index futures are difficult to forecast due to unpredictable stock market conditions. Despite this fact, efforts are being made over the years to create an efficient forecasting tool. The current advancements in technology like machine learning and artificial intelligence have improved our performance with non-linear estimation. Here, the non-linear, RNN (Recurrence Neural Networks) -based stock index prediction model has been compared to the linear, technical indicator-based stock index prediction model. In our empirical research, ten years of day-wise close price data of Tata Consultancy Services Ltd has been used. The study explores two separate methods for predicting stock prices, each coming from a distinct specialty: In the linear model, MA (moving average) and EMA (exponential moving average) model, and the nonlinear model LSTM (long short-term memory) approach has been used. The analysis shows that when it comes to stock price prediction, the exponential moving average outperforms the LSTM.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信