后定性诱惑(Re)转向研究(er)主体

Neil Carey, Angelo Benozzo
{"title":"后定性诱惑(Re)转向研究(er)主体","authors":"Neil Carey, Angelo Benozzo","doi":"10.7577/rerm.4923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The contribution is an uncertain experiment; a series of fractured and fabulated video (re)turnings that tell on and in the seductive forces making (im)possible claims to know, and takes the form of fragmentary visual re-tellings of the becoming research(er) body.  These visual re-tellings are assembled in video format and can be viewed at this link https://youtu.be/aulMQNEDhGo .  This ‘paper’ contributes to ongoing debates that seek shifts from representationalist research foundations. The (re)turnings (the visual re-tellings) offered here pose questions of what is at stake for qualitative researchers in (dis)claiming the ‘I’ that legitimates them as researching bodies; they expose the limits of reason, the precarity of being thus – seduced by and in discipline, reason and rigor, and contained in and by bodies of research.","PeriodicalId":414651,"journal":{"name":"Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-qualitative seductions: (Re)turning research(er) bodies\",\"authors\":\"Neil Carey, Angelo Benozzo\",\"doi\":\"10.7577/rerm.4923\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The contribution is an uncertain experiment; a series of fractured and fabulated video (re)turnings that tell on and in the seductive forces making (im)possible claims to know, and takes the form of fragmentary visual re-tellings of the becoming research(er) body.  These visual re-tellings are assembled in video format and can be viewed at this link https://youtu.be/aulMQNEDhGo .  This ‘paper’ contributes to ongoing debates that seek shifts from representationalist research foundations. The (re)turnings (the visual re-tellings) offered here pose questions of what is at stake for qualitative researchers in (dis)claiming the ‘I’ that legitimates them as researching bodies; they expose the limits of reason, the precarity of being thus – seduced by and in discipline, reason and rigor, and contained in and by bodies of research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":414651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7577/rerm.4923\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7577/rerm.4923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

贡献是一个不确定的实验;一系列支离破碎和虚构的视频(re)转折,在诱人的力量中讲述并使(im)有可能声称知道,并采取碎片化的视觉形式重新讲述正在成为研究(er)的身体。这些视觉再现以视频格式组装,可在此链接https://youtu.be/aulMQNEDhGo观看。这篇“论文”有助于从代表性主义研究基础寻求转变的持续辩论。这里提供的(重新)转向(视觉上的重新讲述)提出了一个问题,即定性研究人员在(不)声称“我”使他们成为研究主体时,什么是利害攸关的;它们暴露了理性的局限性,暴露了被纪律、理性和严谨所诱惑,被研究机构所包含的不稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Post-qualitative seductions: (Re)turning research(er) bodies
The contribution is an uncertain experiment; a series of fractured and fabulated video (re)turnings that tell on and in the seductive forces making (im)possible claims to know, and takes the form of fragmentary visual re-tellings of the becoming research(er) body.  These visual re-tellings are assembled in video format and can be viewed at this link https://youtu.be/aulMQNEDhGo .  This ‘paper’ contributes to ongoing debates that seek shifts from representationalist research foundations. The (re)turnings (the visual re-tellings) offered here pose questions of what is at stake for qualitative researchers in (dis)claiming the ‘I’ that legitimates them as researching bodies; they expose the limits of reason, the precarity of being thus – seduced by and in discipline, reason and rigor, and contained in and by bodies of research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信