整合数学、科学和工程课程中的作文

V. M. Johnson
{"title":"整合数学、科学和工程课程中的作文","authors":"V. M. Johnson","doi":"10.1109/FIE.1995.483129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most mathematics, science and engineering classrooms rarely give students opportunities to write other than traditional note-taking and laboratory report-writing. New ways of writing in these classrooms should be investigated and, if appropriate with learning objectives, implemented. This research focuses specifically on the possibility of integrating writing-to-learn assignments into an undergraduate physics course. 63 undergraduate physics students were involved in this study. 50 males and 13 females participated. There were 2 Asians, 2 African-Americans, 49 Caucasians, 2 Hispanics, 2 Indians, and 6 who did not indicate ethnicity. 13 majors were also represented. The students were given a list of studying techniques and asked to mark which ones they currently used and which ones they do not use but would use if it was proven beneficial. The students were asked to choose among drawing diagrams, reading the text, rewriting concepts in their own words, study groups and working problems. Of the current techniques surveyed, writing was the least used but was the most likely to be used if they were convinced of its benefits.","PeriodicalId":137465,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1995 25th Annual Conference. Engineering Education for the 21st Century","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating composition in math, science and engineering courses\",\"authors\":\"V. M. Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FIE.1995.483129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Most mathematics, science and engineering classrooms rarely give students opportunities to write other than traditional note-taking and laboratory report-writing. New ways of writing in these classrooms should be investigated and, if appropriate with learning objectives, implemented. This research focuses specifically on the possibility of integrating writing-to-learn assignments into an undergraduate physics course. 63 undergraduate physics students were involved in this study. 50 males and 13 females participated. There were 2 Asians, 2 African-Americans, 49 Caucasians, 2 Hispanics, 2 Indians, and 6 who did not indicate ethnicity. 13 majors were also represented. The students were given a list of studying techniques and asked to mark which ones they currently used and which ones they do not use but would use if it was proven beneficial. The students were asked to choose among drawing diagrams, reading the text, rewriting concepts in their own words, study groups and working problems. Of the current techniques surveyed, writing was the least used but was the most likely to be used if they were convinced of its benefits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":137465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1995 25th Annual Conference. Engineering Education for the 21st Century\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1995 25th Annual Conference. Engineering Education for the 21st Century\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.1995.483129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1995 25th Annual Conference. Engineering Education for the 21st Century","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.1995.483129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

大多数数学、科学和工程教室很少给学生写作的机会,除了传统的记笔记和写实验报告。在这些课堂上,应该研究新的写作方式,如果符合学习目标,应该实施。本研究特别关注在本科物理课程中整合写作学习作业的可能性。本研究共涉及63名物理系本科生。50名男性和13名女性参与了研究。2名亚洲人,2名非裔美国人,49名高加索人,2名西班牙人,2名印度人,6名未注明种族。13个专业也有代表。学生们拿到了一份学习技巧的清单,并被要求标出哪些是他们目前使用的,哪些是他们不使用的,但如果证明是有益的,他们会使用。学生们被要求在绘制图表、阅读课文、用自己的话重写概念、学习小组和解决问题之间进行选择。在目前被调查的技术中,写作是使用最少的,但如果他们确信它的好处,它是最有可能被使用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrating composition in math, science and engineering courses
Most mathematics, science and engineering classrooms rarely give students opportunities to write other than traditional note-taking and laboratory report-writing. New ways of writing in these classrooms should be investigated and, if appropriate with learning objectives, implemented. This research focuses specifically on the possibility of integrating writing-to-learn assignments into an undergraduate physics course. 63 undergraduate physics students were involved in this study. 50 males and 13 females participated. There were 2 Asians, 2 African-Americans, 49 Caucasians, 2 Hispanics, 2 Indians, and 6 who did not indicate ethnicity. 13 majors were also represented. The students were given a list of studying techniques and asked to mark which ones they currently used and which ones they do not use but would use if it was proven beneficial. The students were asked to choose among drawing diagrams, reading the text, rewriting concepts in their own words, study groups and working problems. Of the current techniques surveyed, writing was the least used but was the most likely to be used if they were convinced of its benefits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信