堕胎法背后的法理学冲突

Ravi Singh Chhikara
{"title":"堕胎法背后的法理学冲突","authors":"Ravi Singh Chhikara","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3560034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The abortion involves the most intimate and personal choices a person may make in a lifetime, choices central to personal dignity and autonomy. Protecting access to abortion effectuates vital constitutional values, including dignity, autonomy, equality, and bodily integrity. This is something central to a woman's life, to her dignity. It's a decision she must make for herself. And when the government controls that decision for her, she's being treated as less than a fully adult human responsible for her own choices. Without the right of reproductive choice, women cannot participate equally in the nation's social, political and economic life. Their freedom to decide whether and when to have children opens doors that would otherwise be closed. Through this paper, we have tried to address how various arguments of pro-life supporters are wrong and how the arguments of pro-choice supporters are in accordance with the human conscience.","PeriodicalId":305783,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Justice","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Conflicting Jurisprudence Behind the Laws on Abortion\",\"authors\":\"Ravi Singh Chhikara\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3560034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The abortion involves the most intimate and personal choices a person may make in a lifetime, choices central to personal dignity and autonomy. Protecting access to abortion effectuates vital constitutional values, including dignity, autonomy, equality, and bodily integrity. This is something central to a woman's life, to her dignity. It's a decision she must make for herself. And when the government controls that decision for her, she's being treated as less than a fully adult human responsible for her own choices. Without the right of reproductive choice, women cannot participate equally in the nation's social, political and economic life. Their freedom to decide whether and when to have children opens doors that would otherwise be closed. Through this paper, we have tried to address how various arguments of pro-life supporters are wrong and how the arguments of pro-choice supporters are in accordance with the human conscience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":305783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive Justice\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3560034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3560034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

堕胎涉及到一个人一生中可能做出的最私密和个人的选择,这些选择对个人尊严和自主至关重要。保护堕胎权实现了重要的宪法价值,包括尊严、自主、平等和身体完整。这对一个女人的生活和尊严至关重要。这是她必须自己做的决定。当政府控制了她的决定时,她就没有被当作一个完全成年的人来对待,对自己的选择负责。没有生育选择权,妇女就不能平等地参与国家的社会、政治和经济生活。她们决定是否和何时生孩子的自由打开了原本会被关闭的大门。通过本文,我们试图解决反堕胎支持者的各种论点是错误的,以及支持选择的支持者的论点是如何符合人类良知的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Conflicting Jurisprudence Behind the Laws on Abortion
The abortion involves the most intimate and personal choices a person may make in a lifetime, choices central to personal dignity and autonomy. Protecting access to abortion effectuates vital constitutional values, including dignity, autonomy, equality, and bodily integrity. This is something central to a woman's life, to her dignity. It's a decision she must make for herself. And when the government controls that decision for her, she's being treated as less than a fully adult human responsible for her own choices. Without the right of reproductive choice, women cannot participate equally in the nation's social, political and economic life. Their freedom to decide whether and when to have children opens doors that would otherwise be closed. Through this paper, we have tried to address how various arguments of pro-life supporters are wrong and how the arguments of pro-choice supporters are in accordance with the human conscience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信