电子商务指令和GDPR:算法社会中法律制度的趋同?

G. De Gregorio
{"title":"电子商务指令和GDPR:算法社会中法律制度的趋同?","authors":"G. De Gregorio","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3393557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The legal regimes of online intermediaries’ liability and data protection have been conceived on parallel tracks. Whereas the Data Protection Directive could not exclude from its scope of application the e-Commerce Directive due to chronological reasons, the latter expressly clarified that its scope does not include data protection matters. The rise of the algorithmic society has blurred this traditional gap. From a merely passive role, new online intermediaries such as search engines and social networks have acquired an increasingly active role in managing online contents. At the same time, their role in deciding how to process personal data has transformed these actors from data processors to controllers. This evolving framework has led to the convergence of the parallel tracks which have started to overlap. In particular, the ECJ decision in Google Spain and the Italian Google Vivi Down saga have shown the intersections between the two regimes. The adoption of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has contributed to reducing the gap between the regimes of data protection and ISP liability. The GDPR has clarified that the application of the new Regulation should not affect the rules provided for by the e-Commerce Directive, in particular, those regarding ISP’s liability. The result could be a potential overlap of two layers which, until the adoption of the GDPR, were conceived from two different perspectives.","PeriodicalId":361748,"journal":{"name":"Communication & Technology eJournal","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The e-Commerce Directive and GDPR: Towards Convergence of Legal Regimes in the Algorithmic Society?\",\"authors\":\"G. De Gregorio\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3393557\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The legal regimes of online intermediaries’ liability and data protection have been conceived on parallel tracks. Whereas the Data Protection Directive could not exclude from its scope of application the e-Commerce Directive due to chronological reasons, the latter expressly clarified that its scope does not include data protection matters. The rise of the algorithmic society has blurred this traditional gap. From a merely passive role, new online intermediaries such as search engines and social networks have acquired an increasingly active role in managing online contents. At the same time, their role in deciding how to process personal data has transformed these actors from data processors to controllers. This evolving framework has led to the convergence of the parallel tracks which have started to overlap. In particular, the ECJ decision in Google Spain and the Italian Google Vivi Down saga have shown the intersections between the two regimes. The adoption of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has contributed to reducing the gap between the regimes of data protection and ISP liability. The GDPR has clarified that the application of the new Regulation should not affect the rules provided for by the e-Commerce Directive, in particular, those regarding ISP’s liability. The result could be a potential overlap of two layers which, until the adoption of the GDPR, were conceived from two different perspectives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":361748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communication & Technology eJournal\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communication & Technology eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3393557\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication & Technology eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3393557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

网上中介机构的责任和数据保护的法律制度是并行的。由于时间顺序原因,《数据保护指令》不能将《电子商务指令》排除在其适用范围之外,后者明确澄清其适用范围不包括数据保护事项。算法社会的兴起模糊了这种传统的差距。新的网络中介,如搜索引擎和社交网络,在管理在线内容方面已从被动角色转变为日益积极的角色。与此同时,他们在决定如何处理个人数据方面的角色,使这些参与者从数据处理者转变为控制者。这一不断发展的框架导致了平行轨道的汇合,并开始重叠。特别是,欧洲法院对谷歌西班牙案和意大利谷歌Vivi Down案的裁决显示了两种制度之间的交集。《通用数据保护条例》(GDPR)的通过有助于缩小数据保护制度和互联网服务提供商责任之间的差距。GDPR已经澄清,新法规的应用不应影响电子商务指令所规定的规则,特别是那些关于ISP责任的规则。结果可能是两个层面的潜在重叠,在采用GDPR之前,这两个层面是从两个不同的角度构想的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The e-Commerce Directive and GDPR: Towards Convergence of Legal Regimes in the Algorithmic Society?
The legal regimes of online intermediaries’ liability and data protection have been conceived on parallel tracks. Whereas the Data Protection Directive could not exclude from its scope of application the e-Commerce Directive due to chronological reasons, the latter expressly clarified that its scope does not include data protection matters. The rise of the algorithmic society has blurred this traditional gap. From a merely passive role, new online intermediaries such as search engines and social networks have acquired an increasingly active role in managing online contents. At the same time, their role in deciding how to process personal data has transformed these actors from data processors to controllers. This evolving framework has led to the convergence of the parallel tracks which have started to overlap. In particular, the ECJ decision in Google Spain and the Italian Google Vivi Down saga have shown the intersections between the two regimes. The adoption of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has contributed to reducing the gap between the regimes of data protection and ISP liability. The GDPR has clarified that the application of the new Regulation should not affect the rules provided for by the e-Commerce Directive, in particular, those regarding ISP’s liability. The result could be a potential overlap of two layers which, until the adoption of the GDPR, were conceived from two different perspectives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信