高卢罗曼语方言中陈述句的韵律和不同类型的问题能被识别出来吗?

H. Mixdorff, Philippe Boula de Mareüil, A. Rilliard, Valentina De Iacovo
{"title":"高卢罗曼语方言中陈述句的韵律和不同类型的问题能被识别出来吗?","authors":"H. Mixdorff, Philippe Boula de Mareüil, A. Rilliard, Valentina De Iacovo","doi":"10.21437/tai.2021-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the current study four types of speech acts in several Gallo-Romance dialects are examined: statements, polar questions, incredulous questions (expecting a negative response), and queries for confirmation (expecting a positive response). In a perception experiment we found that the first two types are generally reliably identified whereas for the latter two, only a limited number of utterances yielded recognition rates far above chance. We identified confusions mostly between polar and incredulous questions, as well as between the other two. When examining prosodic differences between the four classes that facilitated discrimination, we found that they mostly concerned the fundamental frequency ( F 0 ) contours, especially in the latter part of the utterances.","PeriodicalId":145363,"journal":{"name":"1st International Conference on Tone and Intonation (TAI)","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can the prosody of statements and various types of questions be identified in Gallo-Romance dialects?\",\"authors\":\"H. Mixdorff, Philippe Boula de Mareüil, A. Rilliard, Valentina De Iacovo\",\"doi\":\"10.21437/tai.2021-10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the current study four types of speech acts in several Gallo-Romance dialects are examined: statements, polar questions, incredulous questions (expecting a negative response), and queries for confirmation (expecting a positive response). In a perception experiment we found that the first two types are generally reliably identified whereas for the latter two, only a limited number of utterances yielded recognition rates far above chance. We identified confusions mostly between polar and incredulous questions, as well as between the other two. When examining prosodic differences between the four classes that facilitated discrimination, we found that they mostly concerned the fundamental frequency ( F 0 ) contours, especially in the latter part of the utterances.\",\"PeriodicalId\":145363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"1st International Conference on Tone and Intonation (TAI)\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"1st International Conference on Tone and Intonation (TAI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21437/tai.2021-10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1st International Conference on Tone and Intonation (TAI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21437/tai.2021-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在目前的研究中,研究了几种高卢罗曼语方言中的四种言语行为:陈述句、极性问题、怀疑问题(期待否定回答)和确认问题(期待肯定回答)。在一个感知实验中,我们发现前两种类型通常被可靠地识别出来,而后两种类型只有有限数量的话语产生了远高于偶然的识别率。我们发现了两极和怀疑问题之间的混淆,以及其他两者之间的混淆。当研究四个类别之间的韵律差异时,我们发现它们主要涉及基本频率(f0)轮廓,特别是在话语的后半部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can the prosody of statements and various types of questions be identified in Gallo-Romance dialects?
In the current study four types of speech acts in several Gallo-Romance dialects are examined: statements, polar questions, incredulous questions (expecting a negative response), and queries for confirmation (expecting a positive response). In a perception experiment we found that the first two types are generally reliably identified whereas for the latter two, only a limited number of utterances yielded recognition rates far above chance. We identified confusions mostly between polar and incredulous questions, as well as between the other two. When examining prosodic differences between the four classes that facilitated discrimination, we found that they mostly concerned the fundamental frequency ( F 0 ) contours, especially in the latter part of the utterances.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信