Polemic on the Legitimacy of Proof of E-Court Trial at the State Administrative Court (Harmonization of Legal Courts and Information Technology in the Covid-19 Pandemic Era)

The Covid-19 pandemic situation which is very dangerous and experienced by all citizens of the world limits all forms of activities in the community. This activity restriction also directly limits the direct interaction of each community. All forms of activity are restricted except regarding activities within the court itself. The courts and trials that should be held directly and open to the public have had to change due to circumstances that are not possible. This court then turned into an online court or commonly known as e-court. The court with the e-court system allows for each of those who served in the trial itself to be carried out online or online. Departing from the existing problems, researchers are interested to make it as research material this time. Looking at the effectiveness of e-court during the Covid-19 pandemic, it became the main goal in this study which was accompanied by polemics or problems that occurred a lot with the implementation of e-court. The writing method on this occasion is a literature study method which will be more emphasized on the use of reading books, related literature, and data collection. This study resulted in a new thought that the implementation of e-court can not be implemented as a whole. The enforcement of this trial or trial must still be accompanied by a non-electronic or conventional trial or trial. Electronic courts have not been fully able to certify the evidence in the trial, especially in the Administrative Court. This electronic justice is still in doubt, especially in terms of the validity that occurs in the evidence itself. This study is expected to be able to make a reference to the legislation after this to strengthen the parts in the judiciary online, especially in electronic evidence