COVID-19大流行腰痛残障自我评价

Listya Tresnanti Mirtha, Diandra Amandita Priambodo, Dinda Nisrina, Evita Stephanie, Kharisma Zatalini Giyani
{"title":"COVID-19大流行腰痛残障自我评价","authors":"Listya Tresnanti Mirtha, Diandra Amandita Priambodo, Dinda Nisrina, Evita Stephanie, Kharisma Zatalini Giyani","doi":"10.36803/ijpmr.v10i02.293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTIntroduction: Low back pain (LBP) interferes with daily activities, which is why monitoring of functional disability is important. Non-urgent hospital visits are reduced due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Functional disability questionnaires serve as an alternative fo r patients to self-monitor their condition.Methods: This case-based study aimed to compare the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS) with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) on their responsiveness in assessing functional disability of patients with LBP. Four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Embase) were searched for literature. Two eligible studies were included in this report. The studies were assessed using the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine critical appraisal tool for diagnostic studies. Data collected on the responsiveness of ODI and QBPDS were measured using the area under the curve (AUC) of a receiver operating curve (ROC), sensitivity, and specificity.Result: Both studies reported higher AUC values for ODI than QBPDS. One study reported higher sensitivity in ODI and identical specificity values for both ODI and QBPDS. QBPDS has comparable responsiveness to ODI in assessing functional disability of pat ients with LBP.Conclusion: Therefore, patients with low back pain can self-monitor their condition with QPBDS, as it is comparable to ODI and suitable for self-monitor during the C OVID-19 pandemicKeywords: assessment, disability evaluation, low back pain, musculoskeletal pain, surveys andquestionnaires","PeriodicalId":247519,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disability Self-evaluation for Low Back Pain in COVID-19 Pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Listya Tresnanti Mirtha, Diandra Amandita Priambodo, Dinda Nisrina, Evita Stephanie, Kharisma Zatalini Giyani\",\"doi\":\"10.36803/ijpmr.v10i02.293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTIntroduction: Low back pain (LBP) interferes with daily activities, which is why monitoring of functional disability is important. Non-urgent hospital visits are reduced due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Functional disability questionnaires serve as an alternative fo r patients to self-monitor their condition.Methods: This case-based study aimed to compare the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS) with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) on their responsiveness in assessing functional disability of patients with LBP. Four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Embase) were searched for literature. Two eligible studies were included in this report. The studies were assessed using the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine critical appraisal tool for diagnostic studies. Data collected on the responsiveness of ODI and QBPDS were measured using the area under the curve (AUC) of a receiver operating curve (ROC), sensitivity, and specificity.Result: Both studies reported higher AUC values for ODI than QBPDS. One study reported higher sensitivity in ODI and identical specificity values for both ODI and QBPDS. QBPDS has comparable responsiveness to ODI in assessing functional disability of pat ients with LBP.Conclusion: Therefore, patients with low back pain can self-monitor their condition with QPBDS, as it is comparable to ODI and suitable for self-monitor during the C OVID-19 pandemicKeywords: assessment, disability evaluation, low back pain, musculoskeletal pain, surveys andquestionnaires\",\"PeriodicalId\":247519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indonesian Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indonesian Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36803/ijpmr.v10i02.293\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36803/ijpmr.v10i02.293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要简介:腰痛(LBP)干扰日常活动,这就是为什么监测功能障碍是重要的。由于COVID-19大流行,非紧急医院就诊减少。功能性残疾问卷是患者自我监测病情的另一种选择。方法:本研究以病例为基础,比较魁北克背痛功能障碍量表(QBPDS)与Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)在评估腰痛患者功能障碍中的反应性。四个数据库(PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane和Embase)进行文献检索。本报告纳入了两项符合条件的研究。这些研究使用循证医学中心诊断研究关键评价工具进行评估。采用受试者工作曲线(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感性和特异性测量ODI和QBPDS的反应性数据。结果:两项研究均报道ODI的AUC值高于QBPDS。一项研究报告ODI的敏感性更高,ODI和QBPDS的特异性值相同。QBPDS在评估腰痛患者的功能障碍方面与ODI具有相当的反应性。结论:QPBDS可与ODI相媲美,适用于covid -19大流行期间腰痛患者的自我监测。关键词:评估,残疾评估,腰痛,肌肉骨骼疼痛,调查与问卷
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disability Self-evaluation for Low Back Pain in COVID-19 Pandemic
ABSTRACTIntroduction: Low back pain (LBP) interferes with daily activities, which is why monitoring of functional disability is important. Non-urgent hospital visits are reduced due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Functional disability questionnaires serve as an alternative fo r patients to self-monitor their condition.Methods: This case-based study aimed to compare the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS) with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) on their responsiveness in assessing functional disability of patients with LBP. Four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Embase) were searched for literature. Two eligible studies were included in this report. The studies were assessed using the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine critical appraisal tool for diagnostic studies. Data collected on the responsiveness of ODI and QBPDS were measured using the area under the curve (AUC) of a receiver operating curve (ROC), sensitivity, and specificity.Result: Both studies reported higher AUC values for ODI than QBPDS. One study reported higher sensitivity in ODI and identical specificity values for both ODI and QBPDS. QBPDS has comparable responsiveness to ODI in assessing functional disability of pat ients with LBP.Conclusion: Therefore, patients with low back pain can self-monitor their condition with QPBDS, as it is comparable to ODI and suitable for self-monitor during the C OVID-19 pandemicKeywords: assessment, disability evaluation, low back pain, musculoskeletal pain, surveys andquestionnaires
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信