基于冲突率的分支启发式CDCL - SAT求解方法

Qingshan Chen, Yang Xu, Guanfeng Wu, Xingxing He
{"title":"基于冲突率的分支启发式CDCL - SAT求解方法","authors":"Qingshan Chen, Yang Xu, Guanfeng Wu, Xingxing He","doi":"10.1109/ISKE.2017.8258777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The modern SAT solvers usually update score of corresponding variables by increasing a bump value on each conflict. Those values are usually constant, but are independent of decision levels and conflicts. Sometimes, it is more efficient for local conflict optimization but weak in global searching. In this paper, we propose a CRB method (Conflicting Rate Branching), which is a variant of VSIDS but different implementation. The CRB updates the score which integrated with the decision level and conflicts whenever a variable is used in conflict analysis. We integrated CRB with MiniSat solvers and evaluated CRB on instances from the SAT Race 2015. Experimental results show that the proposed strategy can solve more instances than EVSIDS and improve performance for both SAT and UNSAT instances.","PeriodicalId":208009,"journal":{"name":"2017 12th International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Knowledge Engineering (ISKE)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conflicting rate based branching heuristic for CDCL SAT solvers\",\"authors\":\"Qingshan Chen, Yang Xu, Guanfeng Wu, Xingxing He\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISKE.2017.8258777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The modern SAT solvers usually update score of corresponding variables by increasing a bump value on each conflict. Those values are usually constant, but are independent of decision levels and conflicts. Sometimes, it is more efficient for local conflict optimization but weak in global searching. In this paper, we propose a CRB method (Conflicting Rate Branching), which is a variant of VSIDS but different implementation. The CRB updates the score which integrated with the decision level and conflicts whenever a variable is used in conflict analysis. We integrated CRB with MiniSat solvers and evaluated CRB on instances from the SAT Race 2015. Experimental results show that the proposed strategy can solve more instances than EVSIDS and improve performance for both SAT and UNSAT instances.\",\"PeriodicalId\":208009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 12th International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Knowledge Engineering (ISKE)\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 12th International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Knowledge Engineering (ISKE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISKE.2017.8258777\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 12th International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Knowledge Engineering (ISKE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISKE.2017.8258777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

现代SAT求解器通常通过增加每个冲突的碰撞值来更新相应变量的分数。这些值通常是恒定的,但与决策级别和冲突无关。有时,局部冲突优化效率更高,但全局搜索效率较低。本文提出了一种冲突速率分支(CRB)方法,它是VSIDS的一种变体,但实现方式不同。当冲突分析中使用某个变量时,CRB将更新与决策水平和冲突相结合的得分。我们将CRB与MiniSat求解器集成在一起,并根据2015年SAT竞赛的实例评估了CRB。实验结果表明,该策略可以解决比EVSIDS更多的实例,并提高了SAT和UNSAT实例的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conflicting rate based branching heuristic for CDCL SAT solvers
The modern SAT solvers usually update score of corresponding variables by increasing a bump value on each conflict. Those values are usually constant, but are independent of decision levels and conflicts. Sometimes, it is more efficient for local conflict optimization but weak in global searching. In this paper, we propose a CRB method (Conflicting Rate Branching), which is a variant of VSIDS but different implementation. The CRB updates the score which integrated with the decision level and conflicts whenever a variable is used in conflict analysis. We integrated CRB with MiniSat solvers and evaluated CRB on instances from the SAT Race 2015. Experimental results show that the proposed strategy can solve more instances than EVSIDS and improve performance for both SAT and UNSAT instances.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信