NASA GRC指南针团队概念点设计和交易混合太阳能电力推进(SEP)/化学推进人类火星深空运输(DST)车辆

M. Mcguire, S. Oleson, Laura M. Burke, Steven L. McCarty, J. M. Newman, M. Martini, D. Smith
{"title":"NASA GRC指南针团队概念点设计和交易混合太阳能电力推进(SEP)/化学推进人类火星深空运输(DST)车辆","authors":"M. Mcguire, S. Oleson, Laura M. Burke, Steven L. McCarty, J. M. Newman, M. Martini, D. Smith","doi":"10.2514/6.2018-5141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"NASA has long been conducting studies which apply different in-space propulsion technology assumptions to the mission of sending humans to Mars. Two of the technologies under study that are considered to be the most near-term with respect to technology readiness level (TRL) are traditional chemical propulsion systems and high-power Solar Electric Propulsion (SEP) systems. The benefit of relatively low trip times inherent in using impulsive chemical propulsion systems to perform the full round-trip DV for human Mars missions is hampered by the large propellant mass required to perform these burns. SEP systems offer the benefit of much lower propellant requirements to perform the same round-trip missions, at the cost of longer trip times. Traditionally, impulsive chemical systems are better suited than SEP when used in a gravity well, and SEP systems are more efficient than traditional impulsive systems when used in interplanetary space. A typical mission to Mars includes both of these scenarios, and thus several NASA architecture studies, performed over the last few years, have looked to combine the use of both SEP and chemical propulsion systems where they are the most beneficial to human Mars missions. This combined propulsion system concept has been referred to as a SEP/Chem hybrid Mars Transfer Vehicle and is currently shown as the concept Deep Space Transport (DST) in the March 2017 NASA presentation to the National Aerospace Council (NAC).","PeriodicalId":366106,"journal":{"name":"2018 AIAA SPACE and Astronautics Forum and Exposition","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NASA GRC Compass Team conceptual point design and trades of a hybrid Solar Electric Propulsion (SEP)/Chemical Propulsion Human Mars Deep Space Transport (DST) Vehicle\",\"authors\":\"M. Mcguire, S. Oleson, Laura M. Burke, Steven L. McCarty, J. M. Newman, M. Martini, D. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.2514/6.2018-5141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"NASA has long been conducting studies which apply different in-space propulsion technology assumptions to the mission of sending humans to Mars. Two of the technologies under study that are considered to be the most near-term with respect to technology readiness level (TRL) are traditional chemical propulsion systems and high-power Solar Electric Propulsion (SEP) systems. The benefit of relatively low trip times inherent in using impulsive chemical propulsion systems to perform the full round-trip DV for human Mars missions is hampered by the large propellant mass required to perform these burns. SEP systems offer the benefit of much lower propellant requirements to perform the same round-trip missions, at the cost of longer trip times. Traditionally, impulsive chemical systems are better suited than SEP when used in a gravity well, and SEP systems are more efficient than traditional impulsive systems when used in interplanetary space. A typical mission to Mars includes both of these scenarios, and thus several NASA architecture studies, performed over the last few years, have looked to combine the use of both SEP and chemical propulsion systems where they are the most beneficial to human Mars missions. This combined propulsion system concept has been referred to as a SEP/Chem hybrid Mars Transfer Vehicle and is currently shown as the concept Deep Space Transport (DST) in the March 2017 NASA presentation to the National Aerospace Council (NAC).\",\"PeriodicalId\":366106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 AIAA SPACE and Astronautics Forum and Exposition\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 AIAA SPACE and Astronautics Forum and Exposition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-5141\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 AIAA SPACE and Astronautics Forum and Exposition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-5141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

美国宇航局长期以来一直在进行研究,将不同的太空推进技术假设应用于将人类送上火星的任务。就技术准备水平(TRL)而言,目前正在研究的两种技术被认为是近期内最快的,它们是传统的化学推进系统和大功率太阳能电力推进系统(SEP)。使用脉冲化学推进系统执行人类火星任务的全往返DV所需的相对较短的行程时间的好处,受到执行这些燃烧所需的大推进剂质量的阻碍。SEP系统的优点是,在执行相同的往返任务时,推进剂需求要低得多,但代价是飞行时间更长。传统上,在重力井中使用脉冲化学系统比SEP更合适,在行星际空间中使用SEP系统比传统脉冲系统更有效。一个典型的火星任务包括这两种情况,因此,在过去几年中,NASA进行了几项架构研究,希望将SEP和化学推进系统的使用结合起来,因为它们对人类火星任务最有利。这种联合推进系统概念被称为SEP/Chem混合火星转移飞行器,目前在2017年3月美国宇航局向国家航空航天委员会(NAC)提交的报告中显示为深空运输(DST)概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
NASA GRC Compass Team conceptual point design and trades of a hybrid Solar Electric Propulsion (SEP)/Chemical Propulsion Human Mars Deep Space Transport (DST) Vehicle
NASA has long been conducting studies which apply different in-space propulsion technology assumptions to the mission of sending humans to Mars. Two of the technologies under study that are considered to be the most near-term with respect to technology readiness level (TRL) are traditional chemical propulsion systems and high-power Solar Electric Propulsion (SEP) systems. The benefit of relatively low trip times inherent in using impulsive chemical propulsion systems to perform the full round-trip DV for human Mars missions is hampered by the large propellant mass required to perform these burns. SEP systems offer the benefit of much lower propellant requirements to perform the same round-trip missions, at the cost of longer trip times. Traditionally, impulsive chemical systems are better suited than SEP when used in a gravity well, and SEP systems are more efficient than traditional impulsive systems when used in interplanetary space. A typical mission to Mars includes both of these scenarios, and thus several NASA architecture studies, performed over the last few years, have looked to combine the use of both SEP and chemical propulsion systems where they are the most beneficial to human Mars missions. This combined propulsion system concept has been referred to as a SEP/Chem hybrid Mars Transfer Vehicle and is currently shown as the concept Deep Space Transport (DST) in the March 2017 NASA presentation to the National Aerospace Council (NAC).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信