风暴中的锚:改革经济制度能减少不确定性吗?来自新西兰的证据

Michael Ryan
{"title":"风暴中的锚:改革经济制度能减少不确定性吗?来自新西兰的证据","authors":"Michael Ryan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3744456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If institutions are designed to create order and reduce uncertainty, poorly-functioning institutions will create `excess' uncertainty. It follows then a reform of such poorly-functioning institutions will only be successful if uncertainty is reduced. This paper, using Bayesian Structural AutoRegression models, empirically assesses institutional reform success by quantifying the reduction in uncertainty. Our application is the wide-ranging institutional reform of New Zealand in the late 20th century (approximately 1984 to 1995). We conclude that, while during the reform period uncertainty increased, the New Zealand institutional reforms were eventually successful in lowering uncertainty from domestic institutional sources. We also content that rising uncertainty immediately prior to reform could have been the spur to reform.","PeriodicalId":330992,"journal":{"name":"New Institutional Economics eJournal","volume":"126 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Anchor in Stormy Seas: Does Reforming Economic Institutions Reduce Uncertainty? Evidence From New Zealand\",\"authors\":\"Michael Ryan\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3744456\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"If institutions are designed to create order and reduce uncertainty, poorly-functioning institutions will create `excess' uncertainty. It follows then a reform of such poorly-functioning institutions will only be successful if uncertainty is reduced. This paper, using Bayesian Structural AutoRegression models, empirically assesses institutional reform success by quantifying the reduction in uncertainty. Our application is the wide-ranging institutional reform of New Zealand in the late 20th century (approximately 1984 to 1995). We conclude that, while during the reform period uncertainty increased, the New Zealand institutional reforms were eventually successful in lowering uncertainty from domestic institutional sources. We also content that rising uncertainty immediately prior to reform could have been the spur to reform.\",\"PeriodicalId\":330992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Institutional Economics eJournal\",\"volume\":\"126 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Institutional Economics eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3744456\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Institutional Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3744456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

如果制度的设计是为了创造秩序和减少不确定性,那么运作不良的制度将造成“过度”的不确定性。因此,只有在不确定性减少的情况下,对这些运作不良的机构进行改革才能取得成功。本文运用贝叶斯结构自回归模型,通过量化不确定性的降低,对制度改革成功与否进行了实证评估。我们的应用是20世纪后期(大约1984年至1995年)新西兰广泛的制度改革。我们的结论是,虽然在改革期间不确定性增加,但新西兰的制度改革最终成功地降低了国内制度来源的不确定性。我们还感到满意的是,在改革之前不断增加的不确定性本可以成为推动改革的动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Anchor in Stormy Seas: Does Reforming Economic Institutions Reduce Uncertainty? Evidence From New Zealand
If institutions are designed to create order and reduce uncertainty, poorly-functioning institutions will create `excess' uncertainty. It follows then a reform of such poorly-functioning institutions will only be successful if uncertainty is reduced. This paper, using Bayesian Structural AutoRegression models, empirically assesses institutional reform success by quantifying the reduction in uncertainty. Our application is the wide-ranging institutional reform of New Zealand in the late 20th century (approximately 1984 to 1995). We conclude that, while during the reform period uncertainty increased, the New Zealand institutional reforms were eventually successful in lowering uncertainty from domestic institutional sources. We also content that rising uncertainty immediately prior to reform could have been the spur to reform.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信