风湿性二尖瓣狭窄患者二尖瓣面积的心脏磁共振成像

A. bedier, A. Sakrana
{"title":"风湿性二尖瓣狭窄患者二尖瓣面积的心脏磁共振成像","authors":"A. bedier, A. Sakrana","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1015844/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background: Rheumatic heart disease which is a result of rheumatic fever is still a major health problem in developing countries. Rheumatic mitral stenosis (MS) is the commonest delayed valvular affection as a consequence of rheumatic fever. The assessment of MS severity by measuring mitral valve area (MVA) is very essential for patient management. Different imaging modalities are available for MVA assessment including echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR).Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare the planimetric MVA between CMR and two dimensional echocardiography in MS patients.Patients and methods: A forty adult patients with symptomatic mitral stenosis were included in the study. Other significant valvular lesions, atrial fibrillation, poor echocardiographic window, contraindications to CMR, and NYHA IV were excluded from the study. All patients were assessed by 2D echocardiography and CMR for MVA measurement.Results: the mean 2D TTE MVA was 1.2±0.26 cm2, while the mean CMR MVA 1.2±0.28 cm2. No significant statistical difference was found between both methods (P value 0.842) with a very strong correlation between both methods (r = 0.93 and p-value < 0.0001). The mean difference of MVA between the two methods was 0.012 cm2.Conclusion: CMR is a non-invasive imaging modality that provides MVA measurement and is a reliable method in the diagnosis of MS patients.","PeriodicalId":408468,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Clinical &amp; Medical Images","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Imaging of Mitral Valve Area by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Patients with Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis\",\"authors\":\"A. bedier, A. Sakrana\",\"doi\":\"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1015844/v1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Background: Rheumatic heart disease which is a result of rheumatic fever is still a major health problem in developing countries. Rheumatic mitral stenosis (MS) is the commonest delayed valvular affection as a consequence of rheumatic fever. The assessment of MS severity by measuring mitral valve area (MVA) is very essential for patient management. Different imaging modalities are available for MVA assessment including echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR).Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare the planimetric MVA between CMR and two dimensional echocardiography in MS patients.Patients and methods: A forty adult patients with symptomatic mitral stenosis were included in the study. Other significant valvular lesions, atrial fibrillation, poor echocardiographic window, contraindications to CMR, and NYHA IV were excluded from the study. All patients were assessed by 2D echocardiography and CMR for MVA measurement.Results: the mean 2D TTE MVA was 1.2±0.26 cm2, while the mean CMR MVA 1.2±0.28 cm2. No significant statistical difference was found between both methods (P value 0.842) with a very strong correlation between both methods (r = 0.93 and p-value < 0.0001). The mean difference of MVA between the two methods was 0.012 cm2.Conclusion: CMR is a non-invasive imaging modality that provides MVA measurement and is a reliable method in the diagnosis of MS patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":408468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Clinical &amp; Medical Images\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Clinical &amp; Medical Images\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1015844/v1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Clinical &amp; Medical Images","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1015844/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:风湿热引起的风湿性心脏病在发展中国家仍然是一个主要的健康问题。风湿性二尖瓣狭窄(MS)是风湿热引起的最常见的迟发性瓣膜病变。通过测量二尖瓣面积(MVA)来评估多发性硬化症的严重程度对患者的治疗非常重要。不同的成像方式可用于MVA评估,包括超声心动图和心血管磁共振(CMR)。目的:本研究的目的是比较CMR和二维超声心动图在MS患者中的平面MVA。患者和方法:40例有症状性二尖瓣狭窄的成年患者纳入研究。其他明显的瓣膜病变、心房颤动、超声心动图窗口差、CMR禁忌症和NYHA IV被排除在研究之外。所有患者均通过二维超声心动图和CMR测量MVA。结果:t2tte平均MVA为1.2±0.26 cm2, CMR平均MVA为1.2±0.28 cm2。两种方法间差异无统计学意义(P值0.842),相关性非常强(r = 0.93, P值< 0.0001)。两种方法的MVA平均差值为0.012 cm2。结论:CMR是一种提供MVA测量的无创成像方式,是一种可靠的MS诊断方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Imaging of Mitral Valve Area by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Patients with Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis
Background: Rheumatic heart disease which is a result of rheumatic fever is still a major health problem in developing countries. Rheumatic mitral stenosis (MS) is the commonest delayed valvular affection as a consequence of rheumatic fever. The assessment of MS severity by measuring mitral valve area (MVA) is very essential for patient management. Different imaging modalities are available for MVA assessment including echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR).Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare the planimetric MVA between CMR and two dimensional echocardiography in MS patients.Patients and methods: A forty adult patients with symptomatic mitral stenosis were included in the study. Other significant valvular lesions, atrial fibrillation, poor echocardiographic window, contraindications to CMR, and NYHA IV were excluded from the study. All patients were assessed by 2D echocardiography and CMR for MVA measurement.Results: the mean 2D TTE MVA was 1.2±0.26 cm2, while the mean CMR MVA 1.2±0.28 cm2. No significant statistical difference was found between both methods (P value 0.842) with a very strong correlation between both methods (r = 0.93 and p-value < 0.0001). The mean difference of MVA between the two methods was 0.012 cm2.Conclusion: CMR is a non-invasive imaging modality that provides MVA measurement and is a reliable method in the diagnosis of MS patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信