Arun Chairmadurai 1, H. Goel, V. Ganesan, Vikraman Subramani 1, Sandeep Kumar Jain 1, Vikash Kumar 1
{"title":"使用HD120™MLC对宫颈癌患者的全骨盆和下主动脉旁淋巴结实施RapidArc的策略","authors":"Arun Chairmadurai 1, H. Goel, V. Ganesan, Vikraman Subramani 1, Sandeep Kumar Jain 1, Vikash Kumar 1","doi":"10.24294/IRR.V0I0.535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To compare the utility of RapidArc® technique with mono or dual isocentre using high-definition 120 multileaf collimator (HD120™MLC) for irradiation of whole pelvis and lower para-aortic lymph node (PALN) in cervical carcinoma.Methods: Ten patients having more than 22-cm treatment target length were delivered 45 Gy in 25 fractions by RapidArc® technique using mono or dual isocenter. Dose distribution characteristics were monitored using various indices. Doses to critical organs were also compared for the sparing effects.Results: Conformity and dose-gradient indices for mono or dual isocenter plans were comparable. However, mono-isocentric plan decreased the heterogeneity index (0.07±0.01) as compared to dual-isocentric plan (0.08±0.01; p<0.05). Mean and maximal doses to various critical organs remained comparable. The mean dose to bowel bag was significantly reduced (p<0.05) in mono-isocentric plan (18.78±5.18 Gy) as compared to dual-isocentric plan (19.20±5.27 Gy). Mono-isocentric plan required 1.3 times higher exposure time than the dual-isocentric plans but reduced the overall treatment time by eliminating intra-fraction patient shift that is inevitable in dual isocenter plan.Discussion: Feasibility of mono-isocentric RapidArc® plan using HD120™MLC for irradiation of whole pelvis and PALN relied on ‘Maximum Leaf Span’, which restricted the ‘leading-leaf’ to surpass the ‘trailing-leaf’ beyond 15-cm. This difficulty was overcome by truncating the field size and fixing the jaws at dedicated positions in mono-isocentric plan.Conclusion: The strategy used in mono-isocentric plan enhanced the utility of RapidArc® using HD120™MLC and also minimized the intra-fraction set-up variations and overall treatment time.","PeriodicalId":153727,"journal":{"name":"Imaging and Radiation Research","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategy to implement RapidArc® using HD120™MLC for irradiation of whole pelvis and lower para-aortic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma\",\"authors\":\"Arun Chairmadurai 1, H. Goel, V. Ganesan, Vikraman Subramani 1, Sandeep Kumar Jain 1, Vikash Kumar 1\",\"doi\":\"10.24294/IRR.V0I0.535\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To compare the utility of RapidArc® technique with mono or dual isocentre using high-definition 120 multileaf collimator (HD120™MLC) for irradiation of whole pelvis and lower para-aortic lymph node (PALN) in cervical carcinoma.Methods: Ten patients having more than 22-cm treatment target length were delivered 45 Gy in 25 fractions by RapidArc® technique using mono or dual isocenter. Dose distribution characteristics were monitored using various indices. Doses to critical organs were also compared for the sparing effects.Results: Conformity and dose-gradient indices for mono or dual isocenter plans were comparable. However, mono-isocentric plan decreased the heterogeneity index (0.07±0.01) as compared to dual-isocentric plan (0.08±0.01; p<0.05). Mean and maximal doses to various critical organs remained comparable. The mean dose to bowel bag was significantly reduced (p<0.05) in mono-isocentric plan (18.78±5.18 Gy) as compared to dual-isocentric plan (19.20±5.27 Gy). Mono-isocentric plan required 1.3 times higher exposure time than the dual-isocentric plans but reduced the overall treatment time by eliminating intra-fraction patient shift that is inevitable in dual isocenter plan.Discussion: Feasibility of mono-isocentric RapidArc® plan using HD120™MLC for irradiation of whole pelvis and PALN relied on ‘Maximum Leaf Span’, which restricted the ‘leading-leaf’ to surpass the ‘trailing-leaf’ beyond 15-cm. This difficulty was overcome by truncating the field size and fixing the jaws at dedicated positions in mono-isocentric plan.Conclusion: The strategy used in mono-isocentric plan enhanced the utility of RapidArc® using HD120™MLC and also minimized the intra-fraction set-up variations and overall treatment time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Imaging and Radiation Research\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Imaging and Radiation Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24294/IRR.V0I0.535\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging and Radiation Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24294/IRR.V0I0.535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Strategy to implement RapidArc® using HD120™MLC for irradiation of whole pelvis and lower para-aortic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma
Purpose: To compare the utility of RapidArc® technique with mono or dual isocentre using high-definition 120 multileaf collimator (HD120™MLC) for irradiation of whole pelvis and lower para-aortic lymph node (PALN) in cervical carcinoma.Methods: Ten patients having more than 22-cm treatment target length were delivered 45 Gy in 25 fractions by RapidArc® technique using mono or dual isocenter. Dose distribution characteristics were monitored using various indices. Doses to critical organs were also compared for the sparing effects.Results: Conformity and dose-gradient indices for mono or dual isocenter plans were comparable. However, mono-isocentric plan decreased the heterogeneity index (0.07±0.01) as compared to dual-isocentric plan (0.08±0.01; p<0.05). Mean and maximal doses to various critical organs remained comparable. The mean dose to bowel bag was significantly reduced (p<0.05) in mono-isocentric plan (18.78±5.18 Gy) as compared to dual-isocentric plan (19.20±5.27 Gy). Mono-isocentric plan required 1.3 times higher exposure time than the dual-isocentric plans but reduced the overall treatment time by eliminating intra-fraction patient shift that is inevitable in dual isocenter plan.Discussion: Feasibility of mono-isocentric RapidArc® plan using HD120™MLC for irradiation of whole pelvis and PALN relied on ‘Maximum Leaf Span’, which restricted the ‘leading-leaf’ to surpass the ‘trailing-leaf’ beyond 15-cm. This difficulty was overcome by truncating the field size and fixing the jaws at dedicated positions in mono-isocentric plan.Conclusion: The strategy used in mono-isocentric plan enhanced the utility of RapidArc® using HD120™MLC and also minimized the intra-fraction set-up variations and overall treatment time.