{"title":"重新审视国际商会费率管制的福利效应","authors":"C. Winston","doi":"10.2307/3003519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the welfare effects of ICC rate regulation for the U.S. surface freight transportation system. An estimate of the deadweight loss under first-best and Ramsey pricing is provided. Various alternatives to current rate regulation are discussed including partial and complete rate reform. The major conclusion regarding piecemeal approaches is that solely deregulating motor freight will increase the amount of traffic misallocation. In the final analysis, the most desirable alternative appears to be deregulation of motor carrier rates accompanied by regulated rate reform in rail.","PeriodicalId":177728,"journal":{"name":"The Bell Journal of Economics","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Welfare Effects of ICC Rate Regulation Revisited\",\"authors\":\"C. Winston\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/3003519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyzes the welfare effects of ICC rate regulation for the U.S. surface freight transportation system. An estimate of the deadweight loss under first-best and Ramsey pricing is provided. Various alternatives to current rate regulation are discussed including partial and complete rate reform. The major conclusion regarding piecemeal approaches is that solely deregulating motor freight will increase the amount of traffic misallocation. In the final analysis, the most desirable alternative appears to be deregulation of motor carrier rates accompanied by regulated rate reform in rail.\",\"PeriodicalId\":177728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Bell Journal of Economics\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Bell Journal of Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/3003519\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bell Journal of Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3003519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Welfare Effects of ICC Rate Regulation Revisited
This article analyzes the welfare effects of ICC rate regulation for the U.S. surface freight transportation system. An estimate of the deadweight loss under first-best and Ramsey pricing is provided. Various alternatives to current rate regulation are discussed including partial and complete rate reform. The major conclusion regarding piecemeal approaches is that solely deregulating motor freight will increase the amount of traffic misallocation. In the final analysis, the most desirable alternative appears to be deregulation of motor carrier rates accompanied by regulated rate reform in rail.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
