俄罗斯“宫廷”概念的民族语言文化特征:基于谚语的分析

Ludmila Popova
{"title":"俄罗斯“宫廷”概念的民族语言文化特征:基于谚语的分析","authors":"Ludmila Popova","doi":"10.14258/filichel(2021)4-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article considers the value component of the concept \"court\" in the Russian everyday linguistic consciousness based on the corpus of proverbs of judicial subjects. The ambiguity of the perception of the concept of \"court\" by ordinary legal consciousness is revealed. The linguistic means of positive and negative evaluation of the court are recorded. Evaluative language means express oppositions of ethno-cultural moral and ethical concepts: \"(not)truth\" / \"lie\", \"(not)justice\", \"offense\", \"(not) righteousness\", \"good\" / \"evil\". In everyday linguistic consciousness, the standard of justice is represented as a right, direct (objective, fair, lawful) court, carried out by a kind, righteous (honest, fair, conscientious, decent, law-abiding) judge, subject to the operation of the law (saint, peacemaker). The provision on the unconditional opposition of the ethical and legal aspects of the Russian linguistic consciousness is corrected: the conceptual syncretism \"truth – justice – legality\" is revealed. \n \n V. Popova. Ethnolinguocultural Specifics of the Russian Concept \"Court\": Based on Proverbs \n \nThe article considers the value component of the concept \"court\" in the Russian everyday linguistic consciousness based on the corpus of proverbs of judicial subjects. The ambiguity of the perception of the concept of \"court\" by ordinary legal consciousness is revealed. The linguistic means of positive and negative evaluation of the court are recorded. Evaluative language means express oppositions of ethno-cultural moral and ethical concepts: \"(not)truth\" / \"lie\", \"(not)justice\", \"offense\", \"(not) righteousness\", \"good\" / \"evil\". In everyday linguistic consciousness, the standard of justice is represented as a right, direct (objective, fair, lawful) court, carried out by a kind, righteous (honest, fair, conscientious, decent, law-abiding) judge, subject to the operation of the law (saint, peacemaker). The provision on the unconditional opposition of the ethical and legal aspects of the Russian linguistic consciousness is corrected: the conceptual syncretism \"truth – justice – legality\" is revealed.","PeriodicalId":217516,"journal":{"name":"Philology & Human","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethnolinguocultural Specifics of the Russian Concept \\\"Court\\\": Based on Proverbs\",\"authors\":\"Ludmila Popova\",\"doi\":\"10.14258/filichel(2021)4-01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article considers the value component of the concept \\\"court\\\" in the Russian everyday linguistic consciousness based on the corpus of proverbs of judicial subjects. The ambiguity of the perception of the concept of \\\"court\\\" by ordinary legal consciousness is revealed. The linguistic means of positive and negative evaluation of the court are recorded. Evaluative language means express oppositions of ethno-cultural moral and ethical concepts: \\\"(not)truth\\\" / \\\"lie\\\", \\\"(not)justice\\\", \\\"offense\\\", \\\"(not) righteousness\\\", \\\"good\\\" / \\\"evil\\\". In everyday linguistic consciousness, the standard of justice is represented as a right, direct (objective, fair, lawful) court, carried out by a kind, righteous (honest, fair, conscientious, decent, law-abiding) judge, subject to the operation of the law (saint, peacemaker). The provision on the unconditional opposition of the ethical and legal aspects of the Russian linguistic consciousness is corrected: the conceptual syncretism \\\"truth – justice – legality\\\" is revealed. \\n \\n V. Popova. Ethnolinguocultural Specifics of the Russian Concept \\\"Court\\\": Based on Proverbs \\n \\nThe article considers the value component of the concept \\\"court\\\" in the Russian everyday linguistic consciousness based on the corpus of proverbs of judicial subjects. The ambiguity of the perception of the concept of \\\"court\\\" by ordinary legal consciousness is revealed. The linguistic means of positive and negative evaluation of the court are recorded. Evaluative language means express oppositions of ethno-cultural moral and ethical concepts: \\\"(not)truth\\\" / \\\"lie\\\", \\\"(not)justice\\\", \\\"offense\\\", \\\"(not) righteousness\\\", \\\"good\\\" / \\\"evil\\\". In everyday linguistic consciousness, the standard of justice is represented as a right, direct (objective, fair, lawful) court, carried out by a kind, righteous (honest, fair, conscientious, decent, law-abiding) judge, subject to the operation of the law (saint, peacemaker). The provision on the unconditional opposition of the ethical and legal aspects of the Russian linguistic consciousness is corrected: the conceptual syncretism \\\"truth – justice – legality\\\" is revealed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":217516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philology & Human\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philology & Human\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14258/filichel(2021)4-01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philology & Human","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14258/filichel(2021)4-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以司法主体谚语语料库为基础,探讨了俄语日常语言意识中“法院”概念的价值构成。揭示了普通法律意识对“法院”概念认知的模糊性。记录了对法院正面评价和负面评价的语言手段。评价性语言意味着表达对民族文化道德伦理概念的对立:“(非)真理”/“谎言”、“(非)正义”、“冒犯”、“(非)正义”、“善”/“恶”。在日常的语言意识中,正义的标准被代表为一个权利的、直接的(客观的、公平的、合法的)法庭,由一个善良的、正义的(诚实的、公平的、有良心的、体面的、守法的)法官执行,服从于法律的运作(圣人、和事人)。修正了俄语语言意识中伦理与法律方面无条件对立的规定,揭示了“真理-正义-合法性”的概念融合。诉罗德。俄语“法院”概念的民族语言文化特征:基于谚语的解读本文以司法主体的谚语语料库为基础,考察了俄语日常语言意识中“法院”概念的价值构成。揭示了普通法律意识对“法院”概念认知的模糊性。记录了对法院正面评价和负面评价的语言手段。评价性语言意味着表达对民族文化道德伦理概念的对立:“(非)真理”/“谎言”、“(非)正义”、“冒犯”、“(非)正义”、“善”/“恶”。在日常的语言意识中,正义的标准被代表为一个权利的、直接的(客观的、公平的、合法的)法庭,由一个善良的、正义的(诚实的、公平的、有良心的、体面的、守法的)法官执行,服从于法律的运作(圣人、和事人)。修正了俄语语言意识中伦理与法律方面无条件对立的规定,揭示了“真理-正义-合法性”的概念融合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethnolinguocultural Specifics of the Russian Concept "Court": Based on Proverbs
The article considers the value component of the concept "court" in the Russian everyday linguistic consciousness based on the corpus of proverbs of judicial subjects. The ambiguity of the perception of the concept of "court" by ordinary legal consciousness is revealed. The linguistic means of positive and negative evaluation of the court are recorded. Evaluative language means express oppositions of ethno-cultural moral and ethical concepts: "(not)truth" / "lie", "(not)justice", "offense", "(not) righteousness", "good" / "evil". In everyday linguistic consciousness, the standard of justice is represented as a right, direct (objective, fair, lawful) court, carried out by a kind, righteous (honest, fair, conscientious, decent, law-abiding) judge, subject to the operation of the law (saint, peacemaker). The provision on the unconditional opposition of the ethical and legal aspects of the Russian linguistic consciousness is corrected: the conceptual syncretism "truth – justice – legality" is revealed. V. Popova. Ethnolinguocultural Specifics of the Russian Concept "Court": Based on Proverbs The article considers the value component of the concept "court" in the Russian everyday linguistic consciousness based on the corpus of proverbs of judicial subjects. The ambiguity of the perception of the concept of "court" by ordinary legal consciousness is revealed. The linguistic means of positive and negative evaluation of the court are recorded. Evaluative language means express oppositions of ethno-cultural moral and ethical concepts: "(not)truth" / "lie", "(not)justice", "offense", "(not) righteousness", "good" / "evil". In everyday linguistic consciousness, the standard of justice is represented as a right, direct (objective, fair, lawful) court, carried out by a kind, righteous (honest, fair, conscientious, decent, law-abiding) judge, subject to the operation of the law (saint, peacemaker). The provision on the unconditional opposition of the ethical and legal aspects of the Russian linguistic consciousness is corrected: the conceptual syncretism "truth – justice – legality" is revealed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信