缺陷分类和缺陷类型被重新审视

DEFECTS '08 Pub Date : 2008-07-20 DOI:10.1145/1390817.1390829

S. Wagner

{"title":"缺陷分类和缺陷类型被重新审视","authors":"S. Wagner","doi":"10.1145/1390817.1390829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There have been various attempts to establish common defect classification systems in standards, academia and industry. The resulted classifications are partly similar but also contain variations and none of which is accepted as a basic tool in software projects. This position paper summarises the work on defect classifications so far, proposes a set of challenges and the direction to a solution.","PeriodicalId":193694,"journal":{"name":"DEFECTS '08","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"62","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defect classification and defect types revisited\",\"authors\":\"S. Wagner\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1390817.1390829\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There have been various attempts to establish common defect classification systems in standards, academia and industry. The resulted classifications are partly similar but also contain variations and none of which is accepted as a basic tool in software projects. This position paper summarises the work on defect classifications so far, proposes a set of challenges and the direction to a solution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":193694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DEFECTS '08\",\"volume\":\"133 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"62\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DEFECTS '08\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1390817.1390829\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEFECTS '08","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1390817.1390829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 62

摘要

在标准、学术界和工业界中，已经有各种各样的尝试来建立通用的缺陷分类系统。结果分类部分相似，但也包含变化，并且没有一个被接受为软件项目中的基本工具。这份立场文件总结了迄今为止在缺陷分类方面的工作，提出了一组挑战和解决方案的方向。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Defect classification and defect types revisited

There have been various attempts to establish common defect classification systems in standards, academia and industry. The resulted classifications are partly similar but also contain variations and none of which is accepted as a basic tool in software projects. This position paper summarises the work on defect classifications so far, proposes a set of challenges and the direction to a solution.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

DEFECTS '08

自引率

0.00%

发文量