分支搜索的信息论方法

Andrew Gilpin, T. Sandholm
{"title":"分支搜索的信息论方法","authors":"Andrew Gilpin, T. Sandholm","doi":"10.1145/1160633.1160732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deciding what to branch on at each node is a key element of search algorithms. We present four families of methods for selecting what question to branch on. They are all information-theoretically motivated to reduce uncertainty in remaining subproblems. In the first family, a good variable to branch on is selected based on lookahead. In real-world procurement optimization, this entropic branching method outperforms default CPLEX and strong branching. The second family combines this idea with strong branching. The third family does not use lookahead, but instead exploits features of the underlying structure of the problem. Experiments show that this family significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art branching strategy when the problem includes indicator variables as the key driver of complexity. The fourth family is about branching using carefully constructed linear inequality constraints over sets of variables.","PeriodicalId":440659,"journal":{"name":"Discret. Optim.","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"45","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Information-theoretic approaches to branching in search\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Gilpin, T. Sandholm\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1160633.1160732\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Deciding what to branch on at each node is a key element of search algorithms. We present four families of methods for selecting what question to branch on. They are all information-theoretically motivated to reduce uncertainty in remaining subproblems. In the first family, a good variable to branch on is selected based on lookahead. In real-world procurement optimization, this entropic branching method outperforms default CPLEX and strong branching. The second family combines this idea with strong branching. The third family does not use lookahead, but instead exploits features of the underlying structure of the problem. Experiments show that this family significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art branching strategy when the problem includes indicator variables as the key driver of complexity. The fourth family is about branching using carefully constructed linear inequality constraints over sets of variables.\",\"PeriodicalId\":440659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Discret. Optim.\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"45\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Discret. Optim.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1160633.1160732\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discret. Optim.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1160633.1160732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 45

摘要

决定每个节点上的分支是搜索算法的关键要素。我们提出了四种选择分支问题的方法。它们都是信息理论驱动的,以减少剩余子问题的不确定性。在第一个家族中,基于前瞻选择一个分支的好变量。在实际采购优化中,该熵分支方法优于默认CPLEX和强分支方法。第二个家族将这一理念与强大的分支相结合。第三类不使用前瞻性,而是利用问题底层结构的特征。实验表明,当问题包含指示变量作为复杂性的关键驱动因素时,该家族显著优于最先进的分支策略。第四个系列是关于在变量集上使用精心构造的线性不等式约束进行分支。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Information-theoretic approaches to branching in search
Deciding what to branch on at each node is a key element of search algorithms. We present four families of methods for selecting what question to branch on. They are all information-theoretically motivated to reduce uncertainty in remaining subproblems. In the first family, a good variable to branch on is selected based on lookahead. In real-world procurement optimization, this entropic branching method outperforms default CPLEX and strong branching. The second family combines this idea with strong branching. The third family does not use lookahead, but instead exploits features of the underlying structure of the problem. Experiments show that this family significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art branching strategy when the problem includes indicator variables as the key driver of complexity. The fourth family is about branching using carefully constructed linear inequality constraints over sets of variables.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信