自由英语国家住房拥有率下降

R. Ronald, C. Lennartz
{"title":"自由英语国家住房拥有率下降","authors":"R. Ronald, C. Lennartz","doi":"10.4324/9781315642338-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rates of homeownership advanced significantly across most advanced economies in the second half of the twentieth century. It not only became the dominant form of housing tenure, but also featured in emerging models of citizenship, welfare, and middle-class identity. Although English speaking, liberal economies such as Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, the UK, and the U.S. have been considered “homeowner societies” and strongly associated with owner-occupation as a cultural norm, widespread homeownership was largely achieved in these countries through political sponsorship and various forms of public subsidies. Among liberal societies, homeownership had a wide-ranging influence on policymaking and thinking more generally, and from the 1980s onward was advanced more aggressively. During this period, a more neoliberal regime of housing finance took hold, facilitating larger and more intensive circulations of capital and debt via an increasingly globalized network of housing and mortgage markets. The Credit Crisis and, ultimately, the Global Financial Crisis critically undermined housing markets and access to owner-occupation, and in recent years a new homeownership regime has begun to emerge. While the tenure remains central to both government and individual aspirations, actual rates of owner-occupation have been in decline. Behind this shift has been an increasing polarization of housing wealth and diminishing affordability and accessibility, especially for younger households. Critically, this chapter explores the rise and ostensible waning of mass homeownership with a focus on the social, economic, and political conditions that have both established its centrality in liberal capitalist economies and resulted in its recent decline.","PeriodicalId":220440,"journal":{"name":"The Routledge Handbook of Housing Policy and Planning","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Declining Homeownership in Liberal, English Speaking Countries\",\"authors\":\"R. Ronald, C. Lennartz\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315642338-10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rates of homeownership advanced significantly across most advanced economies in the second half of the twentieth century. It not only became the dominant form of housing tenure, but also featured in emerging models of citizenship, welfare, and middle-class identity. Although English speaking, liberal economies such as Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, the UK, and the U.S. have been considered “homeowner societies” and strongly associated with owner-occupation as a cultural norm, widespread homeownership was largely achieved in these countries through political sponsorship and various forms of public subsidies. Among liberal societies, homeownership had a wide-ranging influence on policymaking and thinking more generally, and from the 1980s onward was advanced more aggressively. During this period, a more neoliberal regime of housing finance took hold, facilitating larger and more intensive circulations of capital and debt via an increasingly globalized network of housing and mortgage markets. The Credit Crisis and, ultimately, the Global Financial Crisis critically undermined housing markets and access to owner-occupation, and in recent years a new homeownership regime has begun to emerge. While the tenure remains central to both government and individual aspirations, actual rates of owner-occupation have been in decline. Behind this shift has been an increasing polarization of housing wealth and diminishing affordability and accessibility, especially for younger households. Critically, this chapter explores the rise and ostensible waning of mass homeownership with a focus on the social, economic, and political conditions that have both established its centrality in liberal capitalist economies and resulted in its recent decline.\",\"PeriodicalId\":220440,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Routledge Handbook of Housing Policy and Planning\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Routledge Handbook of Housing Policy and Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315642338-10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Routledge Handbook of Housing Policy and Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315642338-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

20世纪下半叶,大多数发达经济体的住房拥有率都有了显著提高。它不仅成为住房使用权的主要形式,而且在公民身份、福利和中产阶级身份的新兴模式中也占有重要地位。尽管澳大利亚、加拿大、爱尔兰、新西兰、英国和美国等讲英语的自由经济国家被认为是“房主社会”,并且与房主自住作为一种文化规范密切相关,但在这些国家,广泛的住房所有权主要是通过政治赞助和各种形式的公共补贴实现的。在自由社会中,住房所有权对政策制定和更普遍的思维产生了广泛的影响,从20世纪80年代开始,这种影响得到了更积极的推进。在此期间,一种更加新自由主义的住房金融制度站稳了脚跟,通过日益全球化的住房和抵押贷款市场网络,促进了更大规模、更密集的资本和债务流通。信贷危机以及最终的全球金融危机严重破坏了住房市场和业主自住的机会,近年来,一种新的住房所有权制度开始出现。尽管住房所有权仍然是政府和个人的核心愿望,但实际自住率一直在下降。在这种转变的背后,是住房财富日益两极分化,负担能力和可及性不断下降,尤其是对年轻家庭而言。重要的是,本章探讨了大规模住房所有权的兴起和表面上的衰落,重点关注社会、经济和政治条件,这些条件既确立了它在自由资本主义经济中的中心地位,又导致了它最近的衰落。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Declining Homeownership in Liberal, English Speaking Countries
Rates of homeownership advanced significantly across most advanced economies in the second half of the twentieth century. It not only became the dominant form of housing tenure, but also featured in emerging models of citizenship, welfare, and middle-class identity. Although English speaking, liberal economies such as Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, the UK, and the U.S. have been considered “homeowner societies” and strongly associated with owner-occupation as a cultural norm, widespread homeownership was largely achieved in these countries through political sponsorship and various forms of public subsidies. Among liberal societies, homeownership had a wide-ranging influence on policymaking and thinking more generally, and from the 1980s onward was advanced more aggressively. During this period, a more neoliberal regime of housing finance took hold, facilitating larger and more intensive circulations of capital and debt via an increasingly globalized network of housing and mortgage markets. The Credit Crisis and, ultimately, the Global Financial Crisis critically undermined housing markets and access to owner-occupation, and in recent years a new homeownership regime has begun to emerge. While the tenure remains central to both government and individual aspirations, actual rates of owner-occupation have been in decline. Behind this shift has been an increasing polarization of housing wealth and diminishing affordability and accessibility, especially for younger households. Critically, this chapter explores the rise and ostensible waning of mass homeownership with a focus on the social, economic, and political conditions that have both established its centrality in liberal capitalist economies and resulted in its recent decline.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信