评估利比里亚两种主要非木材林产品——单纯格里菲尼亚和埃塞俄比亚木杉的传统和可持续采伐方法

Larry C. Hwang, H. Juliani, J. Simon
{"title":"评估利比里亚两种主要非木材林产品——单纯格里菲尼亚和埃塞俄比亚木杉的传统和可持续采伐方法","authors":"Larry C. Hwang, H. Juliani, J. Simon","doi":"10.18052/WWW.SCIPRESS.COM/SFP.4.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditional harvesting methods of Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFP) are known to be destructive and/or wasteful that lead to reduction and sometimes depletion of the population and the biodiversity. Sustainable harvesting however is not only necessary for conservation of biodiversity, but also the livelihoods of many rural peoples in forest areas for their sustenance. Sustainable harvesting increasingly acknowledged as a conservation strategy can easily be employed for plants that require seeds harvest as product, such as Griffonia and Xylopia. The harvesting of these plant products requires a practical method and a change of behavior pattern towards sustainability. Change in behavior patterns with corresponding modifications in harvesting techniques can create a win-win strategy for harvesters and the biodiversity. The study describes current methods for harvesting two important Liberian plant species (Griffonia simplicifolia and Xylopia aethiopica) and suggested alternative (proposed sustainable) technique and their impact on the population in two harvesting seasons. In the first and second harvest seasons, using traditional methods, an average total of 34.6 kg of Xylopia and 22.7 kg of Griffonia pods were collected; while using alternative methods, an average total of 52.5 kg of Xylopia and 34.7kg of Griffonia pods were collected. Equally using the traditional method, an average total number of 87 trees of Xylopia and 85 vines of Griffonia were damaged, while an average total number of 12 trees of Xylopia and 10 vines of Griffonia were damaged using the ‘proposed sustainable’ method. Changes in behavior pattern of local collectors incorporating the ‘proposed sustainable’ alternative method of collection lead towards a win-win situation with added value of preservation.","PeriodicalId":171140,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Food Production","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Traditional and Sustainable Harvesting Methods on the Collection of Two Leading Non-Timber Forest Products - Griffonia simplicifolia and Xylopia aethiopica - In Liberia\",\"authors\":\"Larry C. Hwang, H. Juliani, J. Simon\",\"doi\":\"10.18052/WWW.SCIPRESS.COM/SFP.4.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Traditional harvesting methods of Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFP) are known to be destructive and/or wasteful that lead to reduction and sometimes depletion of the population and the biodiversity. Sustainable harvesting however is not only necessary for conservation of biodiversity, but also the livelihoods of many rural peoples in forest areas for their sustenance. Sustainable harvesting increasingly acknowledged as a conservation strategy can easily be employed for plants that require seeds harvest as product, such as Griffonia and Xylopia. The harvesting of these plant products requires a practical method and a change of behavior pattern towards sustainability. Change in behavior patterns with corresponding modifications in harvesting techniques can create a win-win strategy for harvesters and the biodiversity. The study describes current methods for harvesting two important Liberian plant species (Griffonia simplicifolia and Xylopia aethiopica) and suggested alternative (proposed sustainable) technique and their impact on the population in two harvesting seasons. In the first and second harvest seasons, using traditional methods, an average total of 34.6 kg of Xylopia and 22.7 kg of Griffonia pods were collected; while using alternative methods, an average total of 52.5 kg of Xylopia and 34.7kg of Griffonia pods were collected. Equally using the traditional method, an average total number of 87 trees of Xylopia and 85 vines of Griffonia were damaged, while an average total number of 12 trees of Xylopia and 10 vines of Griffonia were damaged using the ‘proposed sustainable’ method. Changes in behavior pattern of local collectors incorporating the ‘proposed sustainable’ alternative method of collection lead towards a win-win situation with added value of preservation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":171140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Food Production\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Food Production\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18052/WWW.SCIPRESS.COM/SFP.4.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Food Production","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18052/WWW.SCIPRESS.COM/SFP.4.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

众所周知,传统的非木材林产品采伐方法具有破坏性和/或浪费性,导致种群和生物多样性减少,有时甚至枯竭。然而,可持续采伐不仅是保护生物多样性的必要条件,也是许多森林地区农村人民维持生计的必要条件。可持续收获越来越被认为是一种保护策略,可以很容易地用于需要种子收获作为产品的植物,如格里菲斯和木犀草。这些植物产品的收获需要一种实用的方法和行为模式的改变,以实现可持续性。行为模式的改变与采收技术的相应改进可以为采收者和生物多样性创造一个双赢的策略。该研究描述了目前两种重要的利比里亚植物(Griffonia simplicifolia和Xylopia a埃塞俄比亚)的采收方法,并提出了替代(拟议的可持续)技术及其在两个采收季节对种群的影响。在第一和第二收获季节,采用传统方法,平均收集木荚34.6 kg, Griffonia豆荚22.7 kg;而采用替代方法,平均共收集木藻52.5 kg, Griffonia豆荚34.7kg。同样使用传统方法,平均总共有87棵Xylopia树和85棵Griffonia藤被破坏,而使用“建议的可持续”方法,平均总共有12棵Xylopia树和10棵Griffonia藤被破坏。改变本地收集者的行为模式,采用“建议的可持续”收集方法,从而达到双赢的局面,并增加了保存的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing Traditional and Sustainable Harvesting Methods on the Collection of Two Leading Non-Timber Forest Products - Griffonia simplicifolia and Xylopia aethiopica - In Liberia
Traditional harvesting methods of Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFP) are known to be destructive and/or wasteful that lead to reduction and sometimes depletion of the population and the biodiversity. Sustainable harvesting however is not only necessary for conservation of biodiversity, but also the livelihoods of many rural peoples in forest areas for their sustenance. Sustainable harvesting increasingly acknowledged as a conservation strategy can easily be employed for plants that require seeds harvest as product, such as Griffonia and Xylopia. The harvesting of these plant products requires a practical method and a change of behavior pattern towards sustainability. Change in behavior patterns with corresponding modifications in harvesting techniques can create a win-win strategy for harvesters and the biodiversity. The study describes current methods for harvesting two important Liberian plant species (Griffonia simplicifolia and Xylopia aethiopica) and suggested alternative (proposed sustainable) technique and their impact on the population in two harvesting seasons. In the first and second harvest seasons, using traditional methods, an average total of 34.6 kg of Xylopia and 22.7 kg of Griffonia pods were collected; while using alternative methods, an average total of 52.5 kg of Xylopia and 34.7kg of Griffonia pods were collected. Equally using the traditional method, an average total number of 87 trees of Xylopia and 85 vines of Griffonia were damaged, while an average total number of 12 trees of Xylopia and 10 vines of Griffonia were damaged using the ‘proposed sustainable’ method. Changes in behavior pattern of local collectors incorporating the ‘proposed sustainable’ alternative method of collection lead towards a win-win situation with added value of preservation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信