{"title":"“热情和冷静的判断”:廉价仓库和英国慈善机构,1794-1800","authors":"M. Webber","doi":"10.18357/TAR0120103261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1794, English philanthropist Hannah More spearheaded a venture to produce short tracts promoting morality and religion among readers ―the Cheap Repository. The predominant historiographical approach has been to examine the interaction of the Repository with the popular print marketplace. Historians such as Susan Pedersen emphasize that the tracts were intended to supplant subversive forms of popular literature, such as Thomas Paine’s Rights of Man , chapbooks, and broadsides. They argue that the Cheap Repository was an attempt at “top-down” reformation; elite writers sought to suppress the turbulence and political participation of the poor. This paper takes an alternate approach. The tracts are charitable texts which addressed middling and gentry readers as much as (or even more than) they did the poor. The Repository did not isolate labouring people and their print culture as the sole threats to the stability of England, nor did it engage solely in “top-down” moralizing. This essay shows how the Repository lays blame on the charitable practices of state poor relief and rich beneficiaries ―as well as the poor― for encouraging immorality and unrest. The Cheap Repository seeks to reform the meaning and practice of charity amongst all members of English society.","PeriodicalId":143772,"journal":{"name":"The Arbutus Review","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1969-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Warm zeal and cool judgement”: The cheap repository and English charity, 1794-1800\",\"authors\":\"M. Webber\",\"doi\":\"10.18357/TAR0120103261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1794, English philanthropist Hannah More spearheaded a venture to produce short tracts promoting morality and religion among readers ―the Cheap Repository. The predominant historiographical approach has been to examine the interaction of the Repository with the popular print marketplace. Historians such as Susan Pedersen emphasize that the tracts were intended to supplant subversive forms of popular literature, such as Thomas Paine’s Rights of Man , chapbooks, and broadsides. They argue that the Cheap Repository was an attempt at “top-down” reformation; elite writers sought to suppress the turbulence and political participation of the poor. This paper takes an alternate approach. The tracts are charitable texts which addressed middling and gentry readers as much as (or even more than) they did the poor. The Repository did not isolate labouring people and their print culture as the sole threats to the stability of England, nor did it engage solely in “top-down” moralizing. This essay shows how the Repository lays blame on the charitable practices of state poor relief and rich beneficiaries ―as well as the poor― for encouraging immorality and unrest. The Cheap Repository seeks to reform the meaning and practice of charity amongst all members of English society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143772,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Arbutus Review\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1969-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Arbutus Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18357/TAR0120103261\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Arbutus Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18357/TAR0120103261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
1794年,英国慈善家汉娜·莫尔(Hannah More)发起了一项冒险活动,在读者中制作宣传道德和宗教的小册子——《廉价书库》(Cheap Repository)。主要的史学方法是研究库与流行印刷市场的相互作用。苏珊·彼得森(Susan Pedersen)等历史学家强调,这些小册子旨在取代颠覆性的通俗文学形式,如托马斯·潘恩(Thomas Paine)的《人权》(Rights of Man)、小册子和海报。他们认为廉价存储库是一种“自上而下”改革的尝试;精英作家试图压制动荡和穷人的政治参与。本文采用了另一种方法。这些小册子是慈善文本,针对中产阶级和绅士的读者与穷人一样多(甚至更多)。《书库》并没有孤立劳动人民和他们的印刷文化,认为这是对英国稳定的唯一威胁,它也没有只从事“自上而下”的道德说教。这篇文章展示了《储存库》是如何指责国家救济穷人和富人受益人以及穷人的慈善行为鼓励不道德和动荡的。“廉价仓库”试图在英国社会的所有成员中改革慈善的意义和实践。
“Warm zeal and cool judgement”: The cheap repository and English charity, 1794-1800
In 1794, English philanthropist Hannah More spearheaded a venture to produce short tracts promoting morality and religion among readers ―the Cheap Repository. The predominant historiographical approach has been to examine the interaction of the Repository with the popular print marketplace. Historians such as Susan Pedersen emphasize that the tracts were intended to supplant subversive forms of popular literature, such as Thomas Paine’s Rights of Man , chapbooks, and broadsides. They argue that the Cheap Repository was an attempt at “top-down” reformation; elite writers sought to suppress the turbulence and political participation of the poor. This paper takes an alternate approach. The tracts are charitable texts which addressed middling and gentry readers as much as (or even more than) they did the poor. The Repository did not isolate labouring people and their print culture as the sole threats to the stability of England, nor did it engage solely in “top-down” moralizing. This essay shows how the Repository lays blame on the charitable practices of state poor relief and rich beneficiaries ―as well as the poor― for encouraging immorality and unrest. The Cheap Repository seeks to reform the meaning and practice of charity amongst all members of English society.