节11。国际标准处于十字路口

ACM Stand. Pub Date : 1997-12-01 DOI:10.1145/274348.274359
G. Willingmyre
{"title":"节11。国际标准处于十字路口","authors":"G. Willingmyre","doi":"10.1145/274348.274359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ⅵ Critical issues in the rapidly changing global marketplace confront the formal international standards system. George Allen, coach for the Washington Redskins football team, when asked about short and long term approaches to building a winning team, often responded , \" the future is now. \" The international standardization community must adopt the same sense of urgency lest the fate of the dinosaurs befall the current international system. Weakness in the traditional system that leads to competitive threats must be addressed. In so doing, however, the hallmark strengths of international standards must not be sacrificed. To compromise fundamentals would be to sell, for the sake of expediency, the soul of a system that has been beneficial to global trade and worldwide safety, health, and the environment. he Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) defines a standard as a \" document approved by a recognized body that provides, for common and repeated use, rules, guidelines, or characteristics for products or related processes and production methods with which compliance is not mandatory. \" The TBT defines an international body or system as one \" whose membership is open to the relevant bodies of at least all members (of the World Trade Organization (WTO)). \" Thus, an international standard is one approved by an international body. International standards for our purposes are those accredited by the following entities: International Organization for Standardization (ISO), International Elec-trotechnical Commission (IEC), International Telecommunications Union (ITU), Codex Alimentarius (Codex) and a handful of others. They share a common characteristic in that their membership is open to the relevant bodies of WTO member countries, which may be national standards organizations or central governments. The concept of one member per country is key. International standards enjoy a favored status in the global marketplace. The TBT institutionalizes international standards as effective tools in reducing non-tariff barriers to trade. The TBT states, \" Where technical regulations are required and relevant international standards exist or their completion is imminent. Members shall use them, or the relevant parts of them, as a basis for their technical regulations, except when such international standards or relevant parts would be an ineffective or inappropriate means for the fulfillment of the legitimate objectives pursued. \" Similarly, the Agreement on Government Procurement states, \" Technical specifications prescribed by procuring entities shall, where appropriate. .. be based on international standards, where such exist. \" These are not abstract, academic …","PeriodicalId":270594,"journal":{"name":"ACM Stand.","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Section 11. International standards at the crossroads\",\"authors\":\"G. Willingmyre\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/274348.274359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ⅵ Critical issues in the rapidly changing global marketplace confront the formal international standards system. George Allen, coach for the Washington Redskins football team, when asked about short and long term approaches to building a winning team, often responded , \\\" the future is now. \\\" The international standardization community must adopt the same sense of urgency lest the fate of the dinosaurs befall the current international system. Weakness in the traditional system that leads to competitive threats must be addressed. In so doing, however, the hallmark strengths of international standards must not be sacrificed. To compromise fundamentals would be to sell, for the sake of expediency, the soul of a system that has been beneficial to global trade and worldwide safety, health, and the environment. he Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) defines a standard as a \\\" document approved by a recognized body that provides, for common and repeated use, rules, guidelines, or characteristics for products or related processes and production methods with which compliance is not mandatory. \\\" The TBT defines an international body or system as one \\\" whose membership is open to the relevant bodies of at least all members (of the World Trade Organization (WTO)). \\\" Thus, an international standard is one approved by an international body. International standards for our purposes are those accredited by the following entities: International Organization for Standardization (ISO), International Elec-trotechnical Commission (IEC), International Telecommunications Union (ITU), Codex Alimentarius (Codex) and a handful of others. They share a common characteristic in that their membership is open to the relevant bodies of WTO member countries, which may be national standards organizations or central governments. The concept of one member per country is key. International standards enjoy a favored status in the global marketplace. The TBT institutionalizes international standards as effective tools in reducing non-tariff barriers to trade. The TBT states, \\\" Where technical regulations are required and relevant international standards exist or their completion is imminent. Members shall use them, or the relevant parts of them, as a basis for their technical regulations, except when such international standards or relevant parts would be an ineffective or inappropriate means for the fulfillment of the legitimate objectives pursued. \\\" Similarly, the Agreement on Government Procurement states, \\\" Technical specifications prescribed by procuring entities shall, where appropriate. .. be based on international standards, where such exist. \\\" These are not abstract, academic …\",\"PeriodicalId\":270594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Stand.\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Stand.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/274348.274359\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Stand.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/274348.274359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

Ⅵ快速变化的全球市场中的关键问题面临着正式的国际标准体系。华盛顿红人橄榄球队(Washington Redskins)的教练乔治·艾伦(George Allen)在被问及建立一支获胜球队的短期和长期方法时,经常回答说:“未来就是现在。”国际标准化界必须采取同样的紧迫感,以免恐龙的命运降临到目前的国际制度上。传统体系中导致竞争威胁的弱点必须得到解决。然而,在这样做时,不应牺牲国际标准的标志性优势。为了权宜之计,妥协基本原则将是出卖一个有利于全球贸易、全球安全、健康和环境的体系的灵魂。《技术性贸易壁垒协定》(TBT)将标准定义为“由公认机构批准的文件,该文件为产品或相关过程和生产方法提供了共同和重复使用的规则、指南或特征,而非强制性遵守。”技术性贸易壁垒将一个国际机构或体系定义为“其成员资格对至少所有(世界贸易组织)成员的相关机构开放”。因此,国际标准是由一个国际机构批准的标准。对于我们的目的,国际标准是由以下实体认可的标准:国际标准化组织(ISO),国际电工委员会(IEC),国际电信联盟(ITU),食品法典委员会(Codex)和其他一些机构。它们有一个共同的特点,即它们的成员资格对世贸组织成员国的有关机构开放,这些机构可能是国家标准组织或中央政府。每个国家一名成员的概念是关键。国际标准在全球市场上享有有利地位。技术性贸易壁垒使国际标准制度化,成为减少非关税贸易壁垒的有效工具。技术性贸易壁垒规定,“在需要技术法规和相关国际标准存在或即将完成的情况下。各成员应使用这些国际标准或其有关部分作为其技术法规的基础,除非这些国际标准或其有关部分对于实现所追求的合法目标是无效或不适当的手段。”同样,《政府采购协定》规定,“采购实体规定的技术规范应酌情……如果有国际标准,就以国际标准为基础。”这些不是抽象的、学术的……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Section 11. International standards at the crossroads
Ⅵ Critical issues in the rapidly changing global marketplace confront the formal international standards system. George Allen, coach for the Washington Redskins football team, when asked about short and long term approaches to building a winning team, often responded , " the future is now. " The international standardization community must adopt the same sense of urgency lest the fate of the dinosaurs befall the current international system. Weakness in the traditional system that leads to competitive threats must be addressed. In so doing, however, the hallmark strengths of international standards must not be sacrificed. To compromise fundamentals would be to sell, for the sake of expediency, the soul of a system that has been beneficial to global trade and worldwide safety, health, and the environment. he Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) defines a standard as a " document approved by a recognized body that provides, for common and repeated use, rules, guidelines, or characteristics for products or related processes and production methods with which compliance is not mandatory. " The TBT defines an international body or system as one " whose membership is open to the relevant bodies of at least all members (of the World Trade Organization (WTO)). " Thus, an international standard is one approved by an international body. International standards for our purposes are those accredited by the following entities: International Organization for Standardization (ISO), International Elec-trotechnical Commission (IEC), International Telecommunications Union (ITU), Codex Alimentarius (Codex) and a handful of others. They share a common characteristic in that their membership is open to the relevant bodies of WTO member countries, which may be national standards organizations or central governments. The concept of one member per country is key. International standards enjoy a favored status in the global marketplace. The TBT institutionalizes international standards as effective tools in reducing non-tariff barriers to trade. The TBT states, " Where technical regulations are required and relevant international standards exist or their completion is imminent. Members shall use them, or the relevant parts of them, as a basis for their technical regulations, except when such international standards or relevant parts would be an ineffective or inappropriate means for the fulfillment of the legitimate objectives pursued. " Similarly, the Agreement on Government Procurement states, " Technical specifications prescribed by procuring entities shall, where appropriate. .. be based on international standards, where such exist. " These are not abstract, academic …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信