{"title":"表演式阅读文本:海因里希·冯·克莱斯特的破坏性手势","authors":"Katherine Pollock","doi":"10.1353/gyr.2023.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article investigates how Heinrich von Kleist's gestures interrupt cognitive processes and implicate the embodied reader in the text—as a participant in the collective performance of meaning. While Kleist does not present a comprehensive theory of gesture, he provides threads to follow that address the role of gesture in epistemology and aesthetics in two of his two well-known essays, \"Über die allmähliche Verfertigung der Gedanken beim Reden\" (\"On the Gradual Formulation of Thoughts While Speaking\") and \"Über das Marionettentheater\" (\"On the Theater of Marionettes\"). By reading these essays with and through Kleist's novella Das Erdbeben in Chili (The Earthquake in Chile), gestures become visible as productive interruptions of cognition that both disrupt hermeneutic interpretations and draw matter into the process of meaning-making—including the body of the reader. This dynamic comes into sharp relief when considered in conjunction with contemporary theories (e.g., those of Karen Barad, Donna Haraway, and Rebecca Schneider) of performance that illuminate the role of bodies in conceptual activity. With a performative approach, the reader can embrace their entanglement in the text and participate in the ongoing (re)configuration of meaning—two features that are unique to aesthetic engagement with Kleist's writing.","PeriodicalId":385309,"journal":{"name":"Goethe Yearbook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reading Texts Performatively: Disruptive Gestures in Heinrich von Kleist\",\"authors\":\"Katherine Pollock\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/gyr.2023.0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article investigates how Heinrich von Kleist's gestures interrupt cognitive processes and implicate the embodied reader in the text—as a participant in the collective performance of meaning. While Kleist does not present a comprehensive theory of gesture, he provides threads to follow that address the role of gesture in epistemology and aesthetics in two of his two well-known essays, \\\"Über die allmähliche Verfertigung der Gedanken beim Reden\\\" (\\\"On the Gradual Formulation of Thoughts While Speaking\\\") and \\\"Über das Marionettentheater\\\" (\\\"On the Theater of Marionettes\\\"). By reading these essays with and through Kleist's novella Das Erdbeben in Chili (The Earthquake in Chile), gestures become visible as productive interruptions of cognition that both disrupt hermeneutic interpretations and draw matter into the process of meaning-making—including the body of the reader. This dynamic comes into sharp relief when considered in conjunction with contemporary theories (e.g., those of Karen Barad, Donna Haraway, and Rebecca Schneider) of performance that illuminate the role of bodies in conceptual activity. With a performative approach, the reader can embrace their entanglement in the text and participate in the ongoing (re)configuration of meaning—two features that are unique to aesthetic engagement with Kleist's writing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":385309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Goethe Yearbook\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Goethe Yearbook\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/gyr.2023.0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Goethe Yearbook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/gyr.2023.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:本文研究海因里希·冯·克莱斯特(Heinrich von Kleist)的手势如何中断认知过程,并将具身读者作为集体意义表演的参与者牵连到文本中。虽然克莱斯特没有提出一个全面的手势理论,但他在两篇著名的论文中提供了线索,以解决手势在认识论和美学中的作用,“Über die allmähliche Verfertigung der Gedanken beim Reden”(“论说话时思想的逐渐形成”)和“Über das Marionettentheater”(“论木偶的戏剧”)。通过与克莱斯特的中篇小说《智利的地震》(Das Erdbeben in Chili)一起阅读这些文章,我们可以看到,手势作为认知的生产性中断,既破坏了解释学的解释,又将物质引入了意义创造的过程——包括读者的身体。当与当代表演理论(如凯伦·巴拉德、唐娜·哈拉威和丽贝卡·施耐德的理论)结合起来考虑时,这种动态就会显现出来,这些理论阐明了身体在概念活动中的作用。通过表演的方法,读者可以接受他们在文本中的纠缠,并参与正在进行的(重新)意义配置——这是克莱斯特写作中美学参与的两个独特特征。
Reading Texts Performatively: Disruptive Gestures in Heinrich von Kleist
Abstract:This article investigates how Heinrich von Kleist's gestures interrupt cognitive processes and implicate the embodied reader in the text—as a participant in the collective performance of meaning. While Kleist does not present a comprehensive theory of gesture, he provides threads to follow that address the role of gesture in epistemology and aesthetics in two of his two well-known essays, "Über die allmähliche Verfertigung der Gedanken beim Reden" ("On the Gradual Formulation of Thoughts While Speaking") and "Über das Marionettentheater" ("On the Theater of Marionettes"). By reading these essays with and through Kleist's novella Das Erdbeben in Chili (The Earthquake in Chile), gestures become visible as productive interruptions of cognition that both disrupt hermeneutic interpretations and draw matter into the process of meaning-making—including the body of the reader. This dynamic comes into sharp relief when considered in conjunction with contemporary theories (e.g., those of Karen Barad, Donna Haraway, and Rebecca Schneider) of performance that illuminate the role of bodies in conceptual activity. With a performative approach, the reader can embrace their entanglement in the text and participate in the ongoing (re)configuration of meaning—two features that are unique to aesthetic engagement with Kleist's writing.