对TSP软件工程项目数据存储库中的数据质量进行初步评估

Yasutaka Shirai, William R. Nichols, Mark Kasunic
{"title":"对TSP软件工程项目数据存储库中的数据质量进行初步评估","authors":"Yasutaka Shirai, William R. Nichols, Mark Kasunic","doi":"10.1145/2600821.2600841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To meet critical business challenges, software development teams need data to effectively manage product quality, cost, and schedule. The Team Software ProcessSM (TSPSM) provides a framework that teams use to collect software process data in real time, using a defined disciplined process. This data holds promise for use in software engineering research. We combined data from 109 industrial projects into a database to support performance benchmarking and model development. But is the data of sufficient quality to draw conclusions? We applied various tests and techniques to identify data anomalies that affect the quality of the data in several dimensions. In this paper, we report some initial results of our analysis, describing the amount and the rates of identified anomalies and suspect data, including incorrectness, inconsistency, and credibility. To illustrate the types of data available for analysis, we provide three examples. The preliminary results of this empirical study suggest that some aspects of the data quality are good and the data are generally credible, but size data are often missing.","PeriodicalId":296714,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Software and Systems Process","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Initial evaluation of data quality in a TSP software engineering project data repository\",\"authors\":\"Yasutaka Shirai, William R. Nichols, Mark Kasunic\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2600821.2600841\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To meet critical business challenges, software development teams need data to effectively manage product quality, cost, and schedule. The Team Software ProcessSM (TSPSM) provides a framework that teams use to collect software process data in real time, using a defined disciplined process. This data holds promise for use in software engineering research. We combined data from 109 industrial projects into a database to support performance benchmarking and model development. But is the data of sufficient quality to draw conclusions? We applied various tests and techniques to identify data anomalies that affect the quality of the data in several dimensions. In this paper, we report some initial results of our analysis, describing the amount and the rates of identified anomalies and suspect data, including incorrectness, inconsistency, and credibility. To illustrate the types of data available for analysis, we provide three examples. The preliminary results of this empirical study suggest that some aspects of the data quality are good and the data are generally credible, but size data are often missing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":296714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Software and Systems Process\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Software and Systems Process\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2600821.2600841\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Software and Systems Process","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2600821.2600841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

为了满足关键的业务挑战,软件开发团队需要数据来有效地管理产品质量、成本和进度。团队软件过程管理(TSPSM)提供了一个框架,团队可以使用它来使用一个定义好的有纪律的过程实时收集软件过程数据。这些数据有望用于软件工程研究。我们将来自109个工业项目的数据合并到一个数据库中,以支持性能基准和模型开发。但是这些数据的质量是否足以得出结论呢?我们应用了各种测试和技术来识别在几个维度上影响数据质量的数据异常。在本文中,我们报告了我们分析的一些初步结果,描述了识别异常和可疑数据的数量和比率,包括不正确、不一致和可信度。为了说明可用于分析的数据类型,我们提供三个示例。本实证研究的初步结果表明,数据质量的某些方面是好的,数据总体上是可信的,但规模数据往往缺失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Initial evaluation of data quality in a TSP software engineering project data repository
To meet critical business challenges, software development teams need data to effectively manage product quality, cost, and schedule. The Team Software ProcessSM (TSPSM) provides a framework that teams use to collect software process data in real time, using a defined disciplined process. This data holds promise for use in software engineering research. We combined data from 109 industrial projects into a database to support performance benchmarking and model development. But is the data of sufficient quality to draw conclusions? We applied various tests and techniques to identify data anomalies that affect the quality of the data in several dimensions. In this paper, we report some initial results of our analysis, describing the amount and the rates of identified anomalies and suspect data, including incorrectness, inconsistency, and credibility. To illustrate the types of data available for analysis, we provide three examples. The preliminary results of this empirical study suggest that some aspects of the data quality are good and the data are generally credible, but size data are often missing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信