印度尼西亚、马来西亚和英国堕胎政策的法律比较研究

Nur Ras Firzaa
{"title":"印度尼西亚、马来西亚和英国堕胎政策的法律比较研究","authors":"Nur Ras Firzaa","doi":"10.18196/iclr.2114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to address the issue of abortion from the perspective of Malaysian law, Indonesian law, English law and Islamic Jurisprudence. It will look into the three national laws to extricate ruling in regards to abortion and simultaneously making an effort to have knowledge on the ruling of abortion taking into consideration of Islamic Jurisprudence. This paper also critically discussed the law cases that had been decided by courts in each jurisdiction and made comparison to identify b oth the similarities and dissimilarities. The paper had reached some fundamental outcome which are: Malaysian law and Indonesian law impede abortion except in case of necessity and when there are reasonable justifications, however, English law provides that abortion can be done if the fetus is less than 24 weeks of pregnancy. In addition, the scholars are in consensus that abortion is prohibit when the fetus starts to breath.","PeriodicalId":298750,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Comparative Law Review","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Legal Studies of Abortion Policies in Indonesia, Malaysia and England\",\"authors\":\"Nur Ras Firzaa\",\"doi\":\"10.18196/iclr.2114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aims to address the issue of abortion from the perspective of Malaysian law, Indonesian law, English law and Islamic Jurisprudence. It will look into the three national laws to extricate ruling in regards to abortion and simultaneously making an effort to have knowledge on the ruling of abortion taking into consideration of Islamic Jurisprudence. This paper also critically discussed the law cases that had been decided by courts in each jurisdiction and made comparison to identify b oth the similarities and dissimilarities. The paper had reached some fundamental outcome which are: Malaysian law and Indonesian law impede abortion except in case of necessity and when there are reasonable justifications, however, English law provides that abortion can be done if the fetus is less than 24 weeks of pregnancy. In addition, the scholars are in consensus that abortion is prohibit when the fetus starts to breath.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indonesian Comparative Law Review\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indonesian Comparative Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18196/iclr.2114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Comparative Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18196/iclr.2114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在从马来西亚法、印度尼西亚法、英国法和伊斯兰法理学的角度来探讨堕胎问题。将研究三个国家的法律,以解释有关堕胎的裁决,同时考虑到伊斯兰法理学,努力了解有关堕胎的裁决。本文还批判性地讨论了各个司法管辖区法院已经判决的法律案件,并进行了比较,以确定其异同。该文件得出了一些基本结论,即马来西亚法律和印度尼西亚法律禁止堕胎,除非是在必要的情况下和有合理理由的情况下,然而,英国法律规定,如果胎儿怀孕不到24周,可以进行堕胎。此外,学者们一致认为,当胎儿开始呼吸时,禁止堕胎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Legal Studies of Abortion Policies in Indonesia, Malaysia and England
This paper aims to address the issue of abortion from the perspective of Malaysian law, Indonesian law, English law and Islamic Jurisprudence. It will look into the three national laws to extricate ruling in regards to abortion and simultaneously making an effort to have knowledge on the ruling of abortion taking into consideration of Islamic Jurisprudence. This paper also critically discussed the law cases that had been decided by courts in each jurisdiction and made comparison to identify b oth the similarities and dissimilarities. The paper had reached some fundamental outcome which are: Malaysian law and Indonesian law impede abortion except in case of necessity and when there are reasonable justifications, however, English law provides that abortion can be done if the fetus is less than 24 weeks of pregnancy. In addition, the scholars are in consensus that abortion is prohibit when the fetus starts to breath.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信