关系强度与冲突对社会影响力的影响分析

F. Barile, J. Masthoff, Silvia Rossi
{"title":"关系强度与冲突对社会影响力的影响分析","authors":"F. Barile, J. Masthoff, Silvia Rossi","doi":"10.1145/3099023.3099056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Group Recommendation Systems (GRS) are personalization systems that provide recommendations to groups of people considering the initial preferences of each group's member, with the aim to maximize the satisfaction of the whole group. Since recent psychological studies evidence that people's satisfaction is influenced by the satisfaction of other people with whom they perform an activity, it is important to consider human aspects and social characteristics that affect the changes in individual's satisfactions in the recommendations generation process. In this work, we start an experimental analysis on how ties' strength and possible conflicts in a relationship can influence the individual's satisfactions, with the aim to derive a model that can be used to adapt individual utilities to the \"Group Context\" before aggregating them into the group's ones. Our hypothesis is that there is a direct correlation between tie strength and positive shifting, but the presence of conflict, instead, can lead to a negative influence, causing a drifting further apart between people's satisfactions. Results confirm these hypotheses, but also suggest that these two factors are not enough to define a general model and that other factors must be considered.","PeriodicalId":219391,"journal":{"name":"Adjunct Publication of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Detailed Analysis of the Impact of Tie Strength and Conflicts on Social Influence\",\"authors\":\"F. Barile, J. Masthoff, Silvia Rossi\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3099023.3099056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Group Recommendation Systems (GRS) are personalization systems that provide recommendations to groups of people considering the initial preferences of each group's member, with the aim to maximize the satisfaction of the whole group. Since recent psychological studies evidence that people's satisfaction is influenced by the satisfaction of other people with whom they perform an activity, it is important to consider human aspects and social characteristics that affect the changes in individual's satisfactions in the recommendations generation process. In this work, we start an experimental analysis on how ties' strength and possible conflicts in a relationship can influence the individual's satisfactions, with the aim to derive a model that can be used to adapt individual utilities to the \\\"Group Context\\\" before aggregating them into the group's ones. Our hypothesis is that there is a direct correlation between tie strength and positive shifting, but the presence of conflict, instead, can lead to a negative influence, causing a drifting further apart between people's satisfactions. Results confirm these hypotheses, but also suggest that these two factors are not enough to define a general model and that other factors must be considered.\",\"PeriodicalId\":219391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Adjunct Publication of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization\",\"volume\":\"124 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Adjunct Publication of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3099023.3099056\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adjunct Publication of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3099023.3099056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

群体推荐系统(GRS)是一种个性化系统,它根据每个群体成员的初始偏好向群体提供推荐,目的是使整个群体的满意度最大化。由于最近的心理学研究表明,人们的满意度受到与其一起进行活动的其他人的满意度的影响,因此在推荐生成过程中考虑影响个人满意度变化的人的方面和社会特征是很重要的。在这项工作中,我们开始对关系中的纽带强度和可能的冲突如何影响个人满意度进行实验分析,目的是推导出一个模型,该模型可用于在将个体效用聚合到群体效用之前将其适应“群体情境”。我们的假设是,关系强度与积极转变之间存在直接关联,但冲突的存在反而会导致负面影响,导致人们的满意度进一步下降。结果证实了这些假设,但也表明这两个因素不足以定义一般模型,必须考虑其他因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Detailed Analysis of the Impact of Tie Strength and Conflicts on Social Influence
Group Recommendation Systems (GRS) are personalization systems that provide recommendations to groups of people considering the initial preferences of each group's member, with the aim to maximize the satisfaction of the whole group. Since recent psychological studies evidence that people's satisfaction is influenced by the satisfaction of other people with whom they perform an activity, it is important to consider human aspects and social characteristics that affect the changes in individual's satisfactions in the recommendations generation process. In this work, we start an experimental analysis on how ties' strength and possible conflicts in a relationship can influence the individual's satisfactions, with the aim to derive a model that can be used to adapt individual utilities to the "Group Context" before aggregating them into the group's ones. Our hypothesis is that there is a direct correlation between tie strength and positive shifting, but the presence of conflict, instead, can lead to a negative influence, causing a drifting further apart between people's satisfactions. Results confirm these hypotheses, but also suggest that these two factors are not enough to define a general model and that other factors must be considered.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信