可用性错误分类:用户体验从业者的定性数据分析

L. Gorlenko, Paul Englefied
{"title":"可用性错误分类:用户体验从业者的定性数据分析","authors":"L. Gorlenko, Paul Englefied","doi":"10.1145/1125451.1125610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Usability evaluations generate large amounts of poorly structured qualitative data, but traditional methods of analysis are often impractical for use by industry practitioners. To address this, we developed a classification of usability issues covering cause, effect, task impact and business impact. In a design project, this has several applications, such as a) enabling practitioners to analyze qualitative data quickly and reliably; b) ensuring that findings can be systematically compared across studies; c) presenting results to clients in terms of potential business impact and its causes; and d) offering recommendations to designers in terms of design errors and their cost. We continue refining the model as we test it in our projects.","PeriodicalId":201154,"journal":{"name":"CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usability error classification: qualitative data analysis for UX practitioners\",\"authors\":\"L. Gorlenko, Paul Englefied\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1125451.1125610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Usability evaluations generate large amounts of poorly structured qualitative data, but traditional methods of analysis are often impractical for use by industry practitioners. To address this, we developed a classification of usability issues covering cause, effect, task impact and business impact. In a design project, this has several applications, such as a) enabling practitioners to analyze qualitative data quickly and reliably; b) ensuring that findings can be systematically compared across studies; c) presenting results to clients in terms of potential business impact and its causes; and d) offering recommendations to designers in terms of design errors and their cost. We continue refining the model as we test it in our projects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":201154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1125451.1125610\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1125451.1125610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

可用性评估产生大量结构不良的定性数据,但是传统的分析方法对于行业从业者来说通常是不切实际的。为了解决这个问题,我们对可用性问题进行了分类,包括原因、结果、任务影响和业务影响。在设计项目中,这有几个应用,例如a)使从业者能够快速可靠地分析定性数据;B)确保研究结果可以系统地进行比较;C)向客户展示潜在的业务影响及其原因;d)就设计错误及其成本向设计师提供建议。当我们在项目中测试模型时,我们将继续改进模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Usability error classification: qualitative data analysis for UX practitioners
Usability evaluations generate large amounts of poorly structured qualitative data, but traditional methods of analysis are often impractical for use by industry practitioners. To address this, we developed a classification of usability issues covering cause, effect, task impact and business impact. In a design project, this has several applications, such as a) enabling practitioners to analyze qualitative data quickly and reliably; b) ensuring that findings can be systematically compared across studies; c) presenting results to clients in terms of potential business impact and its causes; and d) offering recommendations to designers in terms of design errors and their cost. We continue refining the model as we test it in our projects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信