利用Logistic回归与随机森林对信用卡欺诈检测提高预测精度的比较分析

M. Krishna, J. Praveenchandar
{"title":"利用Logistic回归与随机森林对信用卡欺诈检测提高预测精度的比较分析","authors":"M. Krishna, J. Praveenchandar","doi":"10.1109/ICECAA55415.2022.9936488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aims to identify the frauds committed using a payment card such as credit cards, debit cards, and also an experiment is performed to find the best suitable algorithm among Random forest and Logistic Regression. Materials and Methods: To stop the fraud detections using Random forest (N=10) and Logistic regression (N=10) with supervised learning that gives insights from the previous data. Results: The precision of the random forest is 76.29% compared with Logistic regression with accuracy of 74.65% with statistical significance value p=0.03 (p<0.05) using Independent sample t test. Conclusion: This results proved that Random forest was significantly better for Fraud detection than Logistic regression within the study’s limits.","PeriodicalId":273850,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Conference on Edge Computing and Applications (ICECAA)","volume":"167 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Credit Card Fraud Detection using Logistic regression with Random Forest towards an Increase in Accuracy of Prediction\",\"authors\":\"M. Krishna, J. Praveenchandar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICECAA55415.2022.9936488\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study aims to identify the frauds committed using a payment card such as credit cards, debit cards, and also an experiment is performed to find the best suitable algorithm among Random forest and Logistic Regression. Materials and Methods: To stop the fraud detections using Random forest (N=10) and Logistic regression (N=10) with supervised learning that gives insights from the previous data. Results: The precision of the random forest is 76.29% compared with Logistic regression with accuracy of 74.65% with statistical significance value p=0.03 (p<0.05) using Independent sample t test. Conclusion: This results proved that Random forest was significantly better for Fraud detection than Logistic regression within the study’s limits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":273850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 International Conference on Edge Computing and Applications (ICECAA)\",\"volume\":\"167 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 International Conference on Edge Computing and Applications (ICECAA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECAA55415.2022.9936488\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Conference on Edge Computing and Applications (ICECAA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECAA55415.2022.9936488","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本研究旨在识别信用卡、借记卡等支付卡的欺诈行为,并通过实验在随机森林和逻辑回归中找到最合适的算法。材料和方法:使用随机森林(N=10)和逻辑回归(N=10)与监督学习(从先前的数据中获得见解)来停止欺诈检测。结果:采用独立样本t检验,与Logistic回归相比,随机森林的准确率为76.29%,准确率为74.65%,p=0.03 (p<0.05)。结论:在研究范围内,随机森林的欺诈检测效果明显优于Logistic回归。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of Credit Card Fraud Detection using Logistic regression with Random Forest towards an Increase in Accuracy of Prediction
The study aims to identify the frauds committed using a payment card such as credit cards, debit cards, and also an experiment is performed to find the best suitable algorithm among Random forest and Logistic Regression. Materials and Methods: To stop the fraud detections using Random forest (N=10) and Logistic regression (N=10) with supervised learning that gives insights from the previous data. Results: The precision of the random forest is 76.29% compared with Logistic regression with accuracy of 74.65% with statistical significance value p=0.03 (p<0.05) using Independent sample t test. Conclusion: This results proved that Random forest was significantly better for Fraud detection than Logistic regression within the study’s limits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信