比较数据可视化技术在复杂网络数据集中发现疾病关系的有效性

S. S, Sarang Dileep, Rahan Manoj, Adarsh M, Sandhya Harikumar
{"title":"比较数据可视化技术在复杂网络数据集中发现疾病关系的有效性","authors":"S. S, Sarang Dileep, Rahan Manoj, Adarsh M, Sandhya Harikumar","doi":"10.1109/ICOEI56765.2023.10125700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we compare various data visualization methods for exploring a complicated network dataset containing details on illnesses, symptoms, and safety measures. The dataset was obtained from Kaggle and split into train and test subsets at a 4:1 ratio. It has 269 nodes and 483 edges. To evaluate the network data, we used Neo4j and Gephi, two data visualization tools. The dataset was queried and visually analyzed using Neo4j, and graphical representations of the network were produced using Gephi. We tested the potency of different visualization methods for finding patterns and correlations in the data, including force-directed layouts, node-link diagrams, and matrix views. Moreover, Neo4j's querying capabilities allowed us to analyze sub-networks and their connections in greater detail. Overall, our study shows the value of using a variety of visualization methods to have a deeper understanding of complicated network data. Researchers, medical experts, and public health officials attempting to comprehend and manage illness linkages will find the findings of this study to be quite insightful.","PeriodicalId":168942,"journal":{"name":"2023 7th International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI)","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the Effectiveness of Data Visualization Techniques for Discovering Disease Relationships in a Complex Network Dataset\",\"authors\":\"S. S, Sarang Dileep, Rahan Manoj, Adarsh M, Sandhya Harikumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICOEI56765.2023.10125700\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, we compare various data visualization methods for exploring a complicated network dataset containing details on illnesses, symptoms, and safety measures. The dataset was obtained from Kaggle and split into train and test subsets at a 4:1 ratio. It has 269 nodes and 483 edges. To evaluate the network data, we used Neo4j and Gephi, two data visualization tools. The dataset was queried and visually analyzed using Neo4j, and graphical representations of the network were produced using Gephi. We tested the potency of different visualization methods for finding patterns and correlations in the data, including force-directed layouts, node-link diagrams, and matrix views. Moreover, Neo4j's querying capabilities allowed us to analyze sub-networks and their connections in greater detail. Overall, our study shows the value of using a variety of visualization methods to have a deeper understanding of complicated network data. Researchers, medical experts, and public health officials attempting to comprehend and manage illness linkages will find the findings of this study to be quite insightful.\",\"PeriodicalId\":168942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 7th International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI)\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 7th International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOEI56765.2023.10125700\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 7th International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOEI56765.2023.10125700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项研究中,我们比较了各种数据可视化方法,用于探索包含疾病、症状和安全措施细节的复杂网络数据集。数据集从Kaggle获得,并以4:1的比例分为训练子集和测试子集。它有269个节点和483条边。为了评估网络数据,我们使用了Neo4j和Gephi这两种数据可视化工具。使用Neo4j对数据集进行查询和可视化分析,并使用Gephi生成网络的图形表示。我们测试了在数据中寻找模式和相关性的不同可视化方法的效力,包括力导向布局、节点链接图和矩阵视图。此外,Neo4j的查询功能允许我们更详细地分析子网络及其连接。总的来说,我们的研究显示了使用各种可视化方法对复杂网络数据进行更深入理解的价值。试图理解和管理疾病联系的研究人员、医学专家和公共卫生官员会发现这项研究的发现非常有见地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing the Effectiveness of Data Visualization Techniques for Discovering Disease Relationships in a Complex Network Dataset
In this study, we compare various data visualization methods for exploring a complicated network dataset containing details on illnesses, symptoms, and safety measures. The dataset was obtained from Kaggle and split into train and test subsets at a 4:1 ratio. It has 269 nodes and 483 edges. To evaluate the network data, we used Neo4j and Gephi, two data visualization tools. The dataset was queried and visually analyzed using Neo4j, and graphical representations of the network were produced using Gephi. We tested the potency of different visualization methods for finding patterns and correlations in the data, including force-directed layouts, node-link diagrams, and matrix views. Moreover, Neo4j's querying capabilities allowed us to analyze sub-networks and their connections in greater detail. Overall, our study shows the value of using a variety of visualization methods to have a deeper understanding of complicated network data. Researchers, medical experts, and public health officials attempting to comprehend and manage illness linkages will find the findings of this study to be quite insightful.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信