张力:教师对教师教育中社会正义意义的探索

Shelley Thomas, Christine D. Clayton, Shin-Ying Huang, R. García
{"title":"张力:教师对教师教育中社会正义意义的探索","authors":"Shelley Thomas, Christine D. Clayton, Shin-Ying Huang, R. García","doi":"10.14305/jn.19440413.2018.12.1.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores faculty perspectives of social justice in teacher education within one New York institution with a social justice focus. Grounded in the institution’s self-study process for accreditation, the researchers were a part of a team that collected data from structured interviews, including a card sort, of 42 full time teacher educators across 16 programs in the institution. Informed by sociocultural theories (Vygotsky, 1978; Wertsch, 1991), a content analysis revealed the language selected by faculty as well as their meaning-making process and describes how individuals contextualized those meanings. Findings demonstrated a range of meanings and lack of a shared understanding about social justice. Even where apparent consensus existed around particular terminology, the content analysis revealed that individual meanings were deeply contextualized within disciplines and, thereby, were quite distinct. We raise questions regarding how to use dialogue as a meaning making process, the possibilities for a range of meanings, and the significance of contextualizing social justice. The study suggests that significant tensions remain but that “being in tension” is a critical position and potentially informative to faculty who might consider using a framework that invites more diverse perspective rather than embrace a unitary meaning of the term.","PeriodicalId":271733,"journal":{"name":"Excelsior: Leadership in Teaching and Learning","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Being in Tension: Faculty Explorations of the Meaning of Social Justice in Teacher Education\",\"authors\":\"Shelley Thomas, Christine D. Clayton, Shin-Ying Huang, R. García\",\"doi\":\"10.14305/jn.19440413.2018.12.1.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study explores faculty perspectives of social justice in teacher education within one New York institution with a social justice focus. Grounded in the institution’s self-study process for accreditation, the researchers were a part of a team that collected data from structured interviews, including a card sort, of 42 full time teacher educators across 16 programs in the institution. Informed by sociocultural theories (Vygotsky, 1978; Wertsch, 1991), a content analysis revealed the language selected by faculty as well as their meaning-making process and describes how individuals contextualized those meanings. Findings demonstrated a range of meanings and lack of a shared understanding about social justice. Even where apparent consensus existed around particular terminology, the content analysis revealed that individual meanings were deeply contextualized within disciplines and, thereby, were quite distinct. We raise questions regarding how to use dialogue as a meaning making process, the possibilities for a range of meanings, and the significance of contextualizing social justice. The study suggests that significant tensions remain but that “being in tension” is a critical position and potentially informative to faculty who might consider using a framework that invites more diverse perspective rather than embrace a unitary meaning of the term.\",\"PeriodicalId\":271733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Excelsior: Leadership in Teaching and Learning\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Excelsior: Leadership in Teaching and Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14305/jn.19440413.2018.12.1.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Excelsior: Leadership in Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14305/jn.19440413.2018.12.1.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究以社会正义为重点,探讨了纽约一所大学教师教育中教师对社会正义的看法。基于该机构认证的自学过程,研究人员是一个团队的一部分,该团队从结构化访谈中收集数据,包括卡片类型,来自该机构16个项目的42名全职教师教育工作者。受社会文化理论影响(维果茨基,1978;Wertsch, 1991),内容分析揭示了教师选择的语言以及他们的意义制造过程,并描述了个人如何将这些意义语境化。调查结果显示了一系列的含义和缺乏对社会正义的共同理解。即使在某些特定术语存在明显共识的情况下,内容分析也表明,个别含义在学科中被深刻地语境化,因此是相当不同的。我们提出了关于如何使用对话作为一个意义制造过程的问题,一系列意义的可能性,以及社会正义语境化的重要性。研究表明,明显的紧张关系仍然存在,但“处于紧张状态”是一个关键的位置,可能会给教师提供信息,他们可能会考虑使用一个框架,邀请更多不同的视角,而不是接受这个术语的单一含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Being in Tension: Faculty Explorations of the Meaning of Social Justice in Teacher Education
This study explores faculty perspectives of social justice in teacher education within one New York institution with a social justice focus. Grounded in the institution’s self-study process for accreditation, the researchers were a part of a team that collected data from structured interviews, including a card sort, of 42 full time teacher educators across 16 programs in the institution. Informed by sociocultural theories (Vygotsky, 1978; Wertsch, 1991), a content analysis revealed the language selected by faculty as well as their meaning-making process and describes how individuals contextualized those meanings. Findings demonstrated a range of meanings and lack of a shared understanding about social justice. Even where apparent consensus existed around particular terminology, the content analysis revealed that individual meanings were deeply contextualized within disciplines and, thereby, were quite distinct. We raise questions regarding how to use dialogue as a meaning making process, the possibilities for a range of meanings, and the significance of contextualizing social justice. The study suggests that significant tensions remain but that “being in tension” is a critical position and potentially informative to faculty who might consider using a framework that invites more diverse perspective rather than embrace a unitary meaning of the term.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信