结合隐私结果:教老狗新把戏

E. Brown, T. A. Kosa
{"title":"结合隐私结果:教老狗新把戏","authors":"E. Brown, T. A. Kosa","doi":"10.1109/PST.2008.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Canadian government bodies are subject to a number of requirements, including legislation, regulations,directives and policies, that speaks to informational privacy. These have come to be considered synonymous with the completion of a Privacy Impact Assessment. Some go so far as to specifically require an assessment, but few speak to specific technical content. Nor are there process requirements for sustaining privacy standards once the assessment document is submitted. At best, recommendations are identified to enhance the privacy posture of a program area's information management practices, but there is no mechanism to ensure that they are implemented. We propose the PIA process be adapted to mandate privacy outcomes in terms of specific actions that must betaken once the assessment is complete. Starting with the established PIA document, the program area can identify how to best marry the privacy requirements with the established business processes supporting the service delivery line. The result would incorporate privacy outcomes as ongoing activities and include not only consideration of agency requirements for personal information management, but also the impact to an individual's informational privacy.","PeriodicalId":422934,"journal":{"name":"2008 Sixth Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incorporating Privacy Outcomes: Teaching an Old Dog New Tricks\",\"authors\":\"E. Brown, T. A. Kosa\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PST.2008.27\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Canadian government bodies are subject to a number of requirements, including legislation, regulations,directives and policies, that speaks to informational privacy. These have come to be considered synonymous with the completion of a Privacy Impact Assessment. Some go so far as to specifically require an assessment, but few speak to specific technical content. Nor are there process requirements for sustaining privacy standards once the assessment document is submitted. At best, recommendations are identified to enhance the privacy posture of a program area's information management practices, but there is no mechanism to ensure that they are implemented. We propose the PIA process be adapted to mandate privacy outcomes in terms of specific actions that must betaken once the assessment is complete. Starting with the established PIA document, the program area can identify how to best marry the privacy requirements with the established business processes supporting the service delivery line. The result would incorporate privacy outcomes as ongoing activities and include not only consideration of agency requirements for personal information management, but also the impact to an individual's informational privacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":422934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 Sixth Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 Sixth Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PST.2008.27\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 Sixth Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PST.2008.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

加拿大政府机构受到许多要求的约束,包括涉及信息隐私的法律、法规、指令和政策。这些已被视为完成隐私影响评估的同义词。有些甚至特别要求进行评估,但很少涉及具体的技术内容。一旦提交评估文件,也没有维持隐私标准的流程要求。在最好的情况下,确定建议是为了增强规划领域的信息管理实践的隐私状态,但是没有机制来确保它们被实现。我们建议调整PIA流程,以在评估完成后必须采取的具体行动方面强制要求隐私结果。从已建立的PIA文档开始,计划领域可以确定如何最好地将隐私需求与支持服务交付线的已建立的业务流程结合起来。结果将把隐私结果纳入持续活动,不仅考虑机构对个人信息管理的要求,而且考虑对个人信息隐私的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incorporating Privacy Outcomes: Teaching an Old Dog New Tricks
Canadian government bodies are subject to a number of requirements, including legislation, regulations,directives and policies, that speaks to informational privacy. These have come to be considered synonymous with the completion of a Privacy Impact Assessment. Some go so far as to specifically require an assessment, but few speak to specific technical content. Nor are there process requirements for sustaining privacy standards once the assessment document is submitted. At best, recommendations are identified to enhance the privacy posture of a program area's information management practices, but there is no mechanism to ensure that they are implemented. We propose the PIA process be adapted to mandate privacy outcomes in terms of specific actions that must betaken once the assessment is complete. Starting with the established PIA document, the program area can identify how to best marry the privacy requirements with the established business processes supporting the service delivery line. The result would incorporate privacy outcomes as ongoing activities and include not only consideration of agency requirements for personal information management, but also the impact to an individual's informational privacy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信