保险公司不执行严格法律权利的协议:在法律的阴影下与政府讨价还价

Richard J. Lewis
{"title":"保险公司不执行严格法律权利的协议:在法律的阴影下与政府讨价还价","authors":"Richard J. Lewis","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.1985.tb00839.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is concerned with insurers making agreements not to enforce their legal rights and thereby reducing in importance certain areas of the law of insurance. These agreements are of two kinds: the first is made between insurers themselves, usually with the object of avoiding the uncertainties of legal rules and the expense of obtaining court judgments; the second kind are undertakings given by insurers to government often so as to forestall official criticism and discourage legislation which might otherwise openly regulate their industry. Both types of agreement have received only very limited attention from writers on insurance law.The article illustrates that the operation of the legal process may not be fully revealed by study only of those public and visible rules which govern the rights between insurers, government and the public. Private agreements. which may not even amount to legally enforceable contracts, are one of the less visible factors that can transform the surface appearance of the legal system.","PeriodicalId":446261,"journal":{"name":"AARN: Legal Anthropology (Sub-Topic)","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insurers' Agreements Not to Enforce Strict Legal Rights: Bargaining with Government and in the Shadow of the Law\",\"authors\":\"Richard J. Lewis\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1468-2230.1985.tb00839.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article is concerned with insurers making agreements not to enforce their legal rights and thereby reducing in importance certain areas of the law of insurance. These agreements are of two kinds: the first is made between insurers themselves, usually with the object of avoiding the uncertainties of legal rules and the expense of obtaining court judgments; the second kind are undertakings given by insurers to government often so as to forestall official criticism and discourage legislation which might otherwise openly regulate their industry. Both types of agreement have received only very limited attention from writers on insurance law.The article illustrates that the operation of the legal process may not be fully revealed by study only of those public and visible rules which govern the rights between insurers, government and the public. Private agreements. which may not even amount to legally enforceable contracts, are one of the less visible factors that can transform the surface appearance of the legal system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":446261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AARN: Legal Anthropology (Sub-Topic)\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AARN: Legal Anthropology (Sub-Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1985.tb00839.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AARN: Legal Anthropology (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1985.tb00839.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

本文涉及保险公司订立协议不执行其合法权利,从而降低保险法某些领域的重要性。这些协议有两种:第一种是在保险公司之间达成的,通常是为了避免法律规则的不确定性和获得法院判决的费用;第二类是保险公司向政府作出的承诺,通常是为了防止官方的批评和阻止立法,否则立法可能会公开监管他们的行业。这两种类型的协议只受到保险法作者非常有限的关注。本文说明,仅仅研究那些支配保险公司、政府和公众之间权利的公开的、可见的规则,可能无法充分揭示法律程序的运作。私人协议。这些合同甚至可能不具有法律上的可执行性,是可以改变法律制度表面外观的不太明显的因素之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Insurers' Agreements Not to Enforce Strict Legal Rights: Bargaining with Government and in the Shadow of the Law
This article is concerned with insurers making agreements not to enforce their legal rights and thereby reducing in importance certain areas of the law of insurance. These agreements are of two kinds: the first is made between insurers themselves, usually with the object of avoiding the uncertainties of legal rules and the expense of obtaining court judgments; the second kind are undertakings given by insurers to government often so as to forestall official criticism and discourage legislation which might otherwise openly regulate their industry. Both types of agreement have received only very limited attention from writers on insurance law.The article illustrates that the operation of the legal process may not be fully revealed by study only of those public and visible rules which govern the rights between insurers, government and the public. Private agreements. which may not even amount to legally enforceable contracts, are one of the less visible factors that can transform the surface appearance of the legal system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信