基于平衡计分卡的土耳其银行业绩效评估与分析网络过程(ANP)

H. Di̇nçer, Umit Hacioglu, S. Yuksel
{"title":"基于平衡计分卡的土耳其银行业绩效评估与分析网络过程(ANP)","authors":"H. Di̇nçer, Umit Hacioglu, S. Yuksel","doi":"10.20525/ijdsa.v1i1.1415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last decade, Performance assessment of banking sectors in advanced economies became a prominent issue investment decision. This paper aims to evaluate the balanced-scorecard-based performance of the Turkish banking sector using the Analytic Network Process Approach. Within this scope, all 33 deposit banks were intended to analyze out of 34 banks. Within this scope, we made an analysis in order to determine which perspectives of the balanced scorecard approach are appropriate for each type of bank (state banks, private banks, foreign banks). In this study, we used Analytic Network Process (ANP) approaches so as to achieve this objective. With a balanced-scorecard performance assessment of the banking sector using the ANP approach, all the factor priorities have been extracted and normalized to one for each cluster and final priorities have been obtained. The final priorities and rankings of each perspective of the balanced scorecard and the type of bank ownership have been assessed in the model. According to the results of the analysis, Findings demonstrate that (i) financial factor of balanced scorecard approach has the first rank with 65.7 percent; (ii) Customer perceptive is in the second rank with 22.1 percent. (iii)Third and fourth ranks have close results, (iv) learning and growth stay in the third rank with 6.3 percent (v) internal factor has the weakest importance with 5.9%, (vi) state banks into bank ownership have the highest rank with 53.9 percent, (vii) Private owned banks are the second in the relative performance of the bank groups with 36.1%, (viii) Balanced scorecard based performance of foreign banks are replaced in the last order with approximately 10%.","PeriodicalId":130015,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Decision Sciences & Applications (2528-956X)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balanced scorecard-based performance assessment of Turkish banking sector with the Analytic Network Process (ANP)\",\"authors\":\"H. Di̇nçer, Umit Hacioglu, S. Yuksel\",\"doi\":\"10.20525/ijdsa.v1i1.1415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the last decade, Performance assessment of banking sectors in advanced economies became a prominent issue investment decision. This paper aims to evaluate the balanced-scorecard-based performance of the Turkish banking sector using the Analytic Network Process Approach. Within this scope, all 33 deposit banks were intended to analyze out of 34 banks. Within this scope, we made an analysis in order to determine which perspectives of the balanced scorecard approach are appropriate for each type of bank (state banks, private banks, foreign banks). In this study, we used Analytic Network Process (ANP) approaches so as to achieve this objective. With a balanced-scorecard performance assessment of the banking sector using the ANP approach, all the factor priorities have been extracted and normalized to one for each cluster and final priorities have been obtained. The final priorities and rankings of each perspective of the balanced scorecard and the type of bank ownership have been assessed in the model. According to the results of the analysis, Findings demonstrate that (i) financial factor of balanced scorecard approach has the first rank with 65.7 percent; (ii) Customer perceptive is in the second rank with 22.1 percent. (iii)Third and fourth ranks have close results, (iv) learning and growth stay in the third rank with 6.3 percent (v) internal factor has the weakest importance with 5.9%, (vi) state banks into bank ownership have the highest rank with 53.9 percent, (vii) Private owned banks are the second in the relative performance of the bank groups with 36.1%, (viii) Balanced scorecard based performance of foreign banks are replaced in the last order with approximately 10%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":130015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Decision Sciences & Applications (2528-956X)\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Decision Sciences & Applications (2528-956X)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20525/ijdsa.v1i1.1415\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Decision Sciences & Applications (2528-956X)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20525/ijdsa.v1i1.1415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

近十年来,发达经济体银行业绩效评估成为投资决策中的一个突出问题。本文旨在利用分析网络过程方法评估土耳其银行业基于平衡计分卡的绩效。在这一范围内,将对34家银行中的33家储蓄银行全部进行分析。在这个范围内,我们进行了分析,以确定平衡计分卡方法的哪些观点适用于每种类型的银行(国有银行、私人银行、外资银行)。在本研究中,我们使用分析网络过程(ANP)方法来实现这一目标。通过使用ANP方法对银行业进行平衡计分卡绩效评估,提取了所有因素优先级,并将其归一化为每个集群的一个因素,从而获得了最终优先级。平衡计分卡的每个角度的最终优先级和排名以及银行所有权类型已经在模型中进行了评估。根据分析结果,研究发现:(1)平衡计分卡方法的财务因素以65.7%的比例居首位;(ii)客户感知排在第二位,为22.1%。(iii)第三和第四名结果接近,(iv)学习和成长保持在第三名,占6.3%;(v)内部因素的重要性最弱,占5.9%;(vi)国有银行对银行所有权的重要性最高,占53.9%;(vii)私营银行在银行集团的相对绩效中排名第二,占36.1%;(viii)外资银行基于平衡计分卡的绩效以约10%的比例被取代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Balanced scorecard-based performance assessment of Turkish banking sector with the Analytic Network Process (ANP)
In the last decade, Performance assessment of banking sectors in advanced economies became a prominent issue investment decision. This paper aims to evaluate the balanced-scorecard-based performance of the Turkish banking sector using the Analytic Network Process Approach. Within this scope, all 33 deposit banks were intended to analyze out of 34 banks. Within this scope, we made an analysis in order to determine which perspectives of the balanced scorecard approach are appropriate for each type of bank (state banks, private banks, foreign banks). In this study, we used Analytic Network Process (ANP) approaches so as to achieve this objective. With a balanced-scorecard performance assessment of the banking sector using the ANP approach, all the factor priorities have been extracted and normalized to one for each cluster and final priorities have been obtained. The final priorities and rankings of each perspective of the balanced scorecard and the type of bank ownership have been assessed in the model. According to the results of the analysis, Findings demonstrate that (i) financial factor of balanced scorecard approach has the first rank with 65.7 percent; (ii) Customer perceptive is in the second rank with 22.1 percent. (iii)Third and fourth ranks have close results, (iv) learning and growth stay in the third rank with 6.3 percent (v) internal factor has the weakest importance with 5.9%, (vi) state banks into bank ownership have the highest rank with 53.9 percent, (vii) Private owned banks are the second in the relative performance of the bank groups with 36.1%, (viii) Balanced scorecard based performance of foreign banks are replaced in the last order with approximately 10%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信