假新闻,公民的简单化和民主的危险

G. Borgna
{"title":"假新闻,公民的简单化和民主的危险","authors":"G. Borgna","doi":"10.2478/tfd-2018-0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When we see a big family on a festive day at the restaurant and we do not hear any conversation going, but we see everybody, from grandparents to the smallest child, compulsively hacking on smart phones, we feel that a reflection is needed. Just as when in front of the Mona Lisa we see that the majority of visitors, instead of pausing to admire her beauty, of wondering who this woman was, in what time she lived, who was the artist who portrayed her, limit themselves to a hurried selfie and away they go. We wonder, without wanting to dramatize, how citizens, especially young people, can possibly acquire an objective, critical, but above all well-reasoned understanding of the world in which they should take part. How can they, if their vision comes mostly from the internet and social networks, contribute to the formation of a new society and get the maximum benefit from the advancing revolution? How, instead of suffering its negative effects and remaining on its margins, can they become its main actors? These and other questions are the ones Tom Nichols, an American intellectual, posed himself observing and analyzing the evolution of the current American society in a very detailed and documented way. In his recent book entitled “The Death of Expertise: The Campaign Against Established Knowledge and Why it Matters”, looking at the deep crisis that is engulfing American society, he tries to identify the behaviors that can aggravate it, endangering the survival of the democratic system. But he also tries to give an answer: what is necessary to do concretely to counter this dangerous involution. He observes that, in American society, there is a new trend, in his opinion very dangerous, which, if not stopped or at least countered with force, can seriously endanger democracy. In the last fifty years, social changes have broken the old barriers of race, class and sex. But instead of producing an increase in the level of education and competence, in the United States a cultural involution has occurred whose most evident effect is a highly critical attitude, a detachment from experts, intellectuals, scientists, seen as enemies. A rejection of hierarchies and skills, an attitude present especially among the new generations. This opposition of the“laymen”to the“experts” does not recognize the role and opinions of the latter, to which they oppose theses and solutions based on feelings and fears, rather than on real data. The importance of formal education and experience is challenged: “disinformation drives knowledge away”. Nichols states that the relationship between experts and citizens has always been based on trust. If this collapses, democracy goes into crisis. Everyone can intervene. Everyone has the right to be treated on an equal footing. Aspirations are placed in the context of a more general “rejection of inequalities”. A problem that, to find a solution or at least a mitigation, must be tackled on a political level and set itself the goal to pursue, at a global level, a different Tom Nichols The Death of Expertise: The Campaign Against Established Knowledge and Why it Matters Oxford University Press, 2017","PeriodicalId":426036,"journal":{"name":"The Federalist Debate","volume":"172 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fake News, Citizens’ Simplism and the Dangers to Democracy\",\"authors\":\"G. Borgna\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/tfd-2018-0036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When we see a big family on a festive day at the restaurant and we do not hear any conversation going, but we see everybody, from grandparents to the smallest child, compulsively hacking on smart phones, we feel that a reflection is needed. Just as when in front of the Mona Lisa we see that the majority of visitors, instead of pausing to admire her beauty, of wondering who this woman was, in what time she lived, who was the artist who portrayed her, limit themselves to a hurried selfie and away they go. We wonder, without wanting to dramatize, how citizens, especially young people, can possibly acquire an objective, critical, but above all well-reasoned understanding of the world in which they should take part. How can they, if their vision comes mostly from the internet and social networks, contribute to the formation of a new society and get the maximum benefit from the advancing revolution? How, instead of suffering its negative effects and remaining on its margins, can they become its main actors? These and other questions are the ones Tom Nichols, an American intellectual, posed himself observing and analyzing the evolution of the current American society in a very detailed and documented way. In his recent book entitled “The Death of Expertise: The Campaign Against Established Knowledge and Why it Matters”, looking at the deep crisis that is engulfing American society, he tries to identify the behaviors that can aggravate it, endangering the survival of the democratic system. But he also tries to give an answer: what is necessary to do concretely to counter this dangerous involution. He observes that, in American society, there is a new trend, in his opinion very dangerous, which, if not stopped or at least countered with force, can seriously endanger democracy. In the last fifty years, social changes have broken the old barriers of race, class and sex. But instead of producing an increase in the level of education and competence, in the United States a cultural involution has occurred whose most evident effect is a highly critical attitude, a detachment from experts, intellectuals, scientists, seen as enemies. A rejection of hierarchies and skills, an attitude present especially among the new generations. This opposition of the“laymen”to the“experts” does not recognize the role and opinions of the latter, to which they oppose theses and solutions based on feelings and fears, rather than on real data. The importance of formal education and experience is challenged: “disinformation drives knowledge away”. Nichols states that the relationship between experts and citizens has always been based on trust. If this collapses, democracy goes into crisis. Everyone can intervene. Everyone has the right to be treated on an equal footing. Aspirations are placed in the context of a more general “rejection of inequalities”. A problem that, to find a solution or at least a mitigation, must be tackled on a political level and set itself the goal to pursue, at a global level, a different Tom Nichols The Death of Expertise: The Campaign Against Established Knowledge and Why it Matters Oxford University Press, 2017\",\"PeriodicalId\":426036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Federalist Debate\",\"volume\":\"172 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Federalist Debate\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/tfd-2018-0036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Federalist Debate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/tfd-2018-0036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当我们在节日里看到一个大家庭在餐馆里,我们听不到任何谈话,但我们看到每个人,从祖父母到最小的孩子,都在强迫性地使用智能手机,我们觉得有必要反思一下。就像在蒙娜丽莎面前,我们看到大多数游客不会停下来欣赏她的美丽,而是想知道这个女人是谁,她生活在什么时代,画她的艺术家是谁,他们只会匆忙自拍,然后离开。我们想知道,不希望戏剧化,公民,特别是年轻人,如何可能获得客观的,批判性的,但最重要的是,对他们应该参与的世界有充分理由的理解。如果他们的愿景主要来自互联网和社交网络,他们如何为新社会的形成做出贡献,并从正在推进的革命中获得最大的利益?他们如何才能不遭受其负面影响并继续处于边缘地位,而成为其主要参与者?这些问题都是美国知识分子汤姆·尼科尔斯(Tom Nichols)在观察和分析当前美国社会的演变过程中提出的,他以一种非常详细和有记录的方式提出了这些问题。在他的新书《专业知识之死:反对既有知识及其重要性的运动》中,他审视了正在吞噬美国社会的深刻危机,试图找出可能加剧危机、危及民主制度生存的行为。但他也试图给出一个答案:有必要采取哪些具体措施来对抗这种危险的演变。他观察到,在美国社会中,有一种新的趋势,在他看来是非常危险的,如果不加以制止或至少用武力加以反击,就会严重危及民主。在过去的50年里,社会的变化打破了种族、阶级和性别的旧障碍。但是,美国的教育水平和能力并没有提高,反而出现了一种文化上的内化,其最明显的影响是一种高度批判的态度,一种与被视为敌人的专家、知识分子和科学家的疏远。对等级制度和技能的拒绝,这种态度尤其出现在新一代中。这种“门外汉”对“专家”的反对并不承认后者的作用和意见,他们反对的是基于感觉和恐惧的论点和解决方案,而不是基于真实的数据。正规教育和经验的重要性受到了挑战:“虚假信息驱走了知识”。尼科尔斯指出,专家和公民之间的关系一直建立在信任的基础上。如果这个体系崩溃,民主就会陷入危机。每个人都可以干预。每个人都有权得到平等的待遇。这些愿望被置于更普遍的“拒绝不平等”的背景下。这个问题,要找到一个解决方案,或者至少是缓解,必须在政治层面上解决,并在全球层面上设定目标,追求一个不同的汤姆·尼科尔斯的《专业知识的死亡:反对既定知识的运动及其重要性》牛津大学出版社,2017年
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fake News, Citizens’ Simplism and the Dangers to Democracy
When we see a big family on a festive day at the restaurant and we do not hear any conversation going, but we see everybody, from grandparents to the smallest child, compulsively hacking on smart phones, we feel that a reflection is needed. Just as when in front of the Mona Lisa we see that the majority of visitors, instead of pausing to admire her beauty, of wondering who this woman was, in what time she lived, who was the artist who portrayed her, limit themselves to a hurried selfie and away they go. We wonder, without wanting to dramatize, how citizens, especially young people, can possibly acquire an objective, critical, but above all well-reasoned understanding of the world in which they should take part. How can they, if their vision comes mostly from the internet and social networks, contribute to the formation of a new society and get the maximum benefit from the advancing revolution? How, instead of suffering its negative effects and remaining on its margins, can they become its main actors? These and other questions are the ones Tom Nichols, an American intellectual, posed himself observing and analyzing the evolution of the current American society in a very detailed and documented way. In his recent book entitled “The Death of Expertise: The Campaign Against Established Knowledge and Why it Matters”, looking at the deep crisis that is engulfing American society, he tries to identify the behaviors that can aggravate it, endangering the survival of the democratic system. But he also tries to give an answer: what is necessary to do concretely to counter this dangerous involution. He observes that, in American society, there is a new trend, in his opinion very dangerous, which, if not stopped or at least countered with force, can seriously endanger democracy. In the last fifty years, social changes have broken the old barriers of race, class and sex. But instead of producing an increase in the level of education and competence, in the United States a cultural involution has occurred whose most evident effect is a highly critical attitude, a detachment from experts, intellectuals, scientists, seen as enemies. A rejection of hierarchies and skills, an attitude present especially among the new generations. This opposition of the“laymen”to the“experts” does not recognize the role and opinions of the latter, to which they oppose theses and solutions based on feelings and fears, rather than on real data. The importance of formal education and experience is challenged: “disinformation drives knowledge away”. Nichols states that the relationship between experts and citizens has always been based on trust. If this collapses, democracy goes into crisis. Everyone can intervene. Everyone has the right to be treated on an equal footing. Aspirations are placed in the context of a more general “rejection of inequalities”. A problem that, to find a solution or at least a mitigation, must be tackled on a political level and set itself the goal to pursue, at a global level, a different Tom Nichols The Death of Expertise: The Campaign Against Established Knowledge and Why it Matters Oxford University Press, 2017
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信